There's a lot of debate in Finland around who is responsible for nature loss, the short answer is everyone. The share of this responsibility is not equal though. It should be clear the responsibility correlates with how much nature has been destroyed. #luontokato
To make this simple: If a government has cut down millions of hectares, they should be responsible for a large share of biodiversity loss, which means they must now pay to restore this. It costs a lot to restore a large amount of nature loss, that's just the simple truth.
Alternatively, if you are a private forest owner, that also makes you responsible for nature and nature loss.
What about the cost? Well, like everything, the cost of nature restoration should be sustainable. It is your government's responsibility to come up with a nature restoration plan that doesn't compromise on the goal and doesn't contort the definition of sustainability.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
