Dr. Holly Walters Profile picture
Dec 13, 2022 7 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Another Shaligram verification today and sadly, the stone turned out to be a fake. Once again, I am seeing more fabricated Shaligrams being passed off as genuine by sellers hoping to capitalize on devotees who cannot travel to #Nepal. (A Thread)
This fake was pretty good though. More convincing than some I've seen.

But here were the obvious signs:
1. There's a seam/break that you can see between the outer nodule and the internal chakras which pries up fairly easily. This is a giveaway that someone took a few likely broken pieces of a real Shaligram (the ammonite imprints) and covered them with a nodule of industrial epoxy.
2. The "printed" look of the outer chakra spiral. This one actually takes a fair amount of experience to recognize though. In some cases, this might actually be convincing as a real, river-worn, ammonite mould but the raised edges are the red flag.
Because! Here, for example, is another fake Shaligram I have. I got this one years ago and use it as a teaching piece. It's entirely fabricated out of M-Seal epoxy and a kind of carved stamp has been used to make the chakra.
So, sadly, I have to return this particular little Shaligram under bad news. It's a fake and was likely made for a seller's market. It didn't even pass my pin test, which revealed the plastic-y exterior. A real Shaligram would powder-scratch.
Anyway, if you want to know more about uncovering fake Shaligrams, or just about Shaligrams in general, check out my discussion here!

"Getting a Fake Shaligram Intentionally"

peregrinationblog.com/2020/04/14/get…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Holly Walters

Dr. Holly Walters Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Manigarm

Aug 13, 2023
Marxism: A Shareable Social Media Essay 🧵🫂

You hear a lot about “Marxism” these days. Mostly as a scare word. The big bad Socialism coming to ruin your good, American, life just like the Communist Red Scare of the 1950s. Problem is... Image
...almost no one talking about Marxism in the news right now is using the term even remotely correctly.

So, what then, is Marxism?
The majority of breathless, talking heads going on about “Marxism” lately seem to be confused by the relationship between several different moments in intellectual history. The first is “postmodernism,” a tragically out-of-date category dragged kicking and screaming out of...
Read 57 tweets
Mar 27, 2023
I'm serious. STEM without the Arts, Social Sciences, and Humanities will produce more "innovative" tech bros who giddily reinvent rent, roommates, taxes, and now...roller skates. With complete, straight-faced, sincerity.

This is a problem. And I have a list (So, thread 🧵)
Tech bros reinvent taxes.

fastcompany.com/40553334/this-…
Tech bros reinvent roommates.

theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Read 16 tweets
Mar 27, 2023
Last night I was watching @FoldableHuman's "Decentraland and the Metaverse" video as I continue looking at data for my digital religion project. And, I just have to say, these tech bros who were all "inspired by The Matrix?" Didn't actually watch it.

Not only is Techno-Salvationism utterly front and center in most of their rhetoric about the future of virtual/augmented reality, but they seem to have almost no real grasp of the meaning in the sci-fi narratives they admire.

academia.edu/39519928/Bad_B…
And so they play right back into the kinds of "faith based" visions that are also leading to greater ritual automation and technological adoration.

theconversation.com/robots-are-per…
Read 6 tweets
Dec 11, 2022
I was recently reading a paper on folk/false etymologies (also sometimes called backronyms), and given the proliferation of them I have seen in terms of politicized language policing online lately, I have some thoughts! (A Thread 🧵 about Language Use) Image
The paper, "The inevitability of folk etymology: a case of collective reality and invisible hands" by Rundblad and Kronenfeld, traces the popularity of folk etymologies through a kind of linguistic consensus. Or, as anthropologists say, because they do a kind of "cultural work." Image
But what struck me particularly was the line: "Folk etymologies often begin as highly individual constructions, but yet seem to conform to some kind of collective reality, which enables language users to accommodate folk etymologised words with apparent ease."
Read 27 tweets
Nov 19, 2022
Unsurprisingly, I am getting very frustrated with media reporting on the arguments between Graham Hancock, his fans, the Netflix series, and actual archaeologists.

The framing of so many of these articles is just awful.

For example, my current aggravations are...
Archaeologists aren't "dismissive" of Graham Hancock's theories. That implies that they are hand-waving him away out of arrogance. Archaeologists don't take Hancock seriously because he's been peddling theories of Atlantis for 30 years with absolutely NO evidence for his claims.
Secondly, they keep quoting Michael Shermer. Who isn't an archaeologist or a scientist. He's a science writer who has a tendency to lean into pop psychology to justify his libertarian political leanings.
Read 12 tweets
Oct 22, 2022
"Ancient Apocalypse" isn't going to tell you anything new. At all.

In fact, I can 100% guarantee that the racism you'll be presented with in regards to archaeological finds is straight out of Victorian Imperialism and the colonialist project.

Don't watch it.
In my "History of Anthropological Thought" lectures, I cover this in regards to two Victorian theories.

1. Hyperdiffusionism
2. Unlinealism
Hyperdiffusionism is a pseudo-archaeological hypothesis suggesting that certain historical technologies or ideas originated with a single people or civilization before their adoption by other cultures.

(In modern New Age circles, it is called "single-sourcing")
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(