Erik ten Hag is an *ELITE* manager. You name the facet of management, and he's elite at it, and there's no doubt about that.
Below, in this in-depth thread, I break down why Manchester United are on their way to be the next elite positional play team in world football.
THREAD!
Casemiro, Eriksen, Antony, Malacia, Lisandro Martinez… what’s the common denominator in ten Hag's signings? Technical quality.
United may be involved in lots of chaotic & transition-based games now but that won’t last. Ten Hag’s tactical intent & squad building is special.
Antony is a guy who may lack the physicality of the true elites in 1v1’s, in transition & to be a reliable penetrative goal threat but he’s near impossible to press. He’s one of the best dribblers I’ve ever seen whilst being a creative outlet.
He’ll allow United to control games
Everybody knows what Antony is now - a uniquely special dribbler who lacks lightening speed but can still dictate attacks and provide reliable output. That’s a top player, and that in tandem with the system he plays in is a perfect fit. United are on a special path under ten Hag.
Seriously, think about it. United build up in a variety of fluid shapes ranging from a 4-1, a 3-2, & a 3-1. Their settled attack can consist of a 4-1-5, a 3-2-5, or a 3-1-6. It's all fluid, but key components remain. The occupation of each zone remains.
The positional play is 🔝
The wide players receive in 1v1 situations out wide or in situations with players in close proximity so they can combine & there's compactness and numbers behind them so they can recycle if needs be too. Each key zone is occupied in the final third (both wings & the half spaces).
United can build play centrally or out wide, irrespective of how the opposition set up. Then, when play breaks down in the final third, that positional play in the final third and compactness behind that in defensive transition is conducive to counterpressing effectively.
Not only that, but ten Hag's settled pressing structure is similarly elite. United press in a 4-4-1-1 akin to Arsenal or City or a 4-3-3 akin to Liverpool where the wide players invert & the fullbacks back the press up.
This structure, in its entirety, is elite. No doubts there.
Then, when factoring in the fact that ten Hag is a top squad builder, a fierce man manager who commands the utmost respect in the dressing room, has proven he can handle unprecedented amounts of pressure (relative to his career) in his early days at Utd, then what can go wrong?
We've also seen excellent individual player development with guys like Rashford coming back to his old-self. You name the box, ten Hag ticks it. He's a complete manager and the best thing about it from a United perspective is he clearly has the backing of the board.
The players signed in the summer were all clearly his, and that's an excellent thing, and that applies to the players sold too. The board backed him over getting rid of star names like Pogba and Ronaldo. He's making this squad his own, and every elite project has that same story.
Guardiola made a statement with Joe Hart, Klopp did it with Benteke, Arteta did it with Ozil & Aubameyang. These guys may be elite tacticians but they're also elite leaders, & ten Hag is the same.
He handled the Ronaldo fiasco impeccably. This is his club now. He made his mark.
However, despite all of these elite facets in ten Hag's profile, the squad quality isn't on that level just yet, hence the inconsistent performance quality on the pitch. He needs time. It's his first season at the football club, so this should go without saying, really.
United don't reliably exert control on games on or off the ball yet because they're not good enough technically. This means that they regularly give the ball away when they have it but it also means that it's hard to press because they consistently lose the ball.
A staple behind any pressing team is top technical security in possession. Why? Well, think about it. If you lose possession in the build-up, you cannot press, you must recover and block the goal. If you lose possession in midfield, the same applies.
You must lose the ball high.
If you lose the ball high the entire team are already in a position where virtually every player is regularly behind the ball so the unit can press as a collective because of that. The ball is also simply closer to the opposition goal and further away from your own.
Pressing 101
These are pressing staples, and until United become good enough technically to reliably keep the ball & pin the opposition back, they won't exert true control on games because the opposition will have easy access to possession through United's own giveaways & disengaged pressing.
Even physically and psychologically it's tough for the players. How can a fullback like Dalot or Malacia/Shaw press as high as the opposition fullback when they're drained from constantly recovering due to possession breakdowns? That in itself breeds a passive & fatigue mindset.
But, as I say, the tactical intent is there (see below in 2nd half with narrow press). That's so clear, and given time to attract better players then success is inevitable.
And the thing is it's not like United need a massive rebuild, either.
It's closer to a City rebuild under Pep where he won the league in his 2nd season as opposed to a Klopp/Arteta rebuild where they had a much bigger job on their hands. The league quality was worse for Pep back then, but United can still accumulate a high points tally next season.
80+ points isn't out of the equation in ten Hag's second season, and that's because he has already done such a good job of rebuilding the team already, irrespective of short-term flaws. If I was a United fan, I wouldn't care for short-term results, much like Arsenal last season.
It seemed like top four was the be all and end all for Arteta at the end of last year but that was never a true representation of reality. It was disappointing, sure, but did it really matter in the long-run? No. Arsenal's process remained, and that's the most important aspect.
Ten Hag and United are the same. Forget top four and immediate success this season. Of course it all matters because short-term success is key for any football club and it could accelerate their long-term process, but the process is the process and ten Hag's process is *ELITE*.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Morocco's #1 strength is their technical quality when playing out from the back. The French's #1 weakness is the fact that they don't exert much pressure on the ball in the oppositions build-up in settled play. That factor means we will, in all likelihood, have a competitive game
Morocco are largely considered to be a defensive team, & they are, but no more than France are defensive. They play out from the back & play beautiful tiki-taka football when in possession. They do defend deep for large periods, but more so because that's their off-ball approach.
Game state also plays a major factor in that. At 0-0 against Portugal, Morocco had a relatively even share of possession despite their passive off-ball approach.
When they went 1-0 up against a team who press high AND have top technicians, they fell back & defended their lead.
2-3-5 for Argentina in settled attacks in a clear attempt to prevent Modric and Kovacic from dominating proceedings technically. The extra number in midfield will help Argentina get a foothold of the game in possession. Enzo-Paredes-RDP midfield 3, fullbacks provide the width.
Out of possession they transition into a 4-4-2 with Mac Allister drifting out to the left and De Paul pressing in the right of midfield with Messi and Alvarez in the front 2.
The plan makes sense, but Croatia will still have settled possession, even if it may be slightly harder.
The Croats are just too good technically. There’s no doubt Argentina’s pressure on the ball is improved in this system but the 4-4-2 press still leaves an overload in the build-up and a 5v4 in the last line. They have the quality to keep the ball - just about breaking ARG down.
João Félix is a truly incredible talent. How many #10's in football are so special technically that they're considered an outlet? How many #10's are ferocious ball-strikers on both feet, or have crazy acceleration?
He needs to be released from Simeone/Santos' shackles..
THREAD!
Joao Felix has spent his early years in his career playing for a defensive Atletico Madrid team under Diego Simeone and a defensive Portugal side under Fernando Santos. For a #10 profile like himself, he couldn't be in a worse environment. He needs to be freed.
Joao Felix has unique ball-carrying and dribbling qualities which make him an outlet. He's like Messi or Neymar in the sense that they don't often run in behind so aren't outlets because of their physicality but are outlets because they're so uniquely special technically.
Bukayo Saka is England's best up-and-coming attacking talent bar NONE. Below, in this in-depth video thread, I break down what makes Saka so special.
His technical quality, physicality, & "la pausa" in tandem with his intelligence makes him a unicorn.
Let's go...
VIDEO-THREAD!
Saka dribbles with his body in between the marker and the ball which means he's hard to dispossess & that along with his clean technical dribbling, strong physical base, low centre of gravity, and ability to receive and dribble at *ALL* angles makes him a unicorn of a player.
He has unmatched "pausa" to stand his man up and can beat them on the inside or outside and if they engage he has the speed and technical dribbling to kill them. Not only that but he also uses his physicality to run in behind whilst having insane technical security on both feet.
Southgate didn't give England the best possible chance of winning. However, are France optimal tactically either? No, France conceded 2.59 xG & accumulated 1.32 xG.
They sit back, don't press high, & that invites chances against them as teams like England create against that.
Although Southgate did give them a very good chance of winning. This is also key to note. Is the reason England are knocked out of the World Cup Southgate's poor tactics? No.
He gave them a good chance of winning the game, just not an optimal one as they were a little disjointed
But most of the dynamics were excellent. The only issue was the large distance between build-up and attack because of Henderson and Bellingham's positioning as #8's which didn't make much sense in Bellingham's case as he was often standing on Foden's toes.
Morocco are a team who don't press unless they counterpress after a settled attack (like all teams do) but they play out from the back. It's a flawed approach on the face of it but when looking at the technical quality they have across the XI, it works. They effectively play out!
Portugal, on the other hand, do press high, so that means Morocco will need to be on their A game in the build-up, but Portugal's press isn't as compact or as aggressive as Spain's was, so it should, in theory, be easier for the Moroccan's to build play out from the back.
Portugal are similar to Spain in the sense that they have so many technical players so they can be very difficult to dispossess but that's not Morroco's strategy anyway - they won't press high, so Portugal will sustain pressure like Spain did, but the reliability of that is key.