holy fucking SHIT. mRNA-1647 is the "bioequivalent" GTMP all of the Moderna regulatory paperwork was done with, and it's been around since 2017. Moderna had mRNA tech ready to go five years ago. @CharlesRixey@joshg99@TheJikky
the first pages are different versions of the 2017-18 study, here's a neat little freudian slip on page 75.
p97... no comment LOL
the summary of analysis was done 6 july 2017? when dosing started 10 july?
spicy! the material for the sprague dawley study was made february 2017, page 103
analytical procedure is 7 pages of [redacted], but at the end is another set of signatures from 6 july 2017.
Next up "certificates of analysis" p116, two pages of redactions from 12.4., a single page from 31.5., and another two from 22.6.
ok i'll have to stop noting the redacted bits because lots of it is. p190 is the first unscarred page in quite a while.
p217 and following comes some actual data. this might be good to compare to the data there is on the euro version
p246 "gross pathological findings" for each rat euthanized. lots of lymph node and thymus findings
p289 pharmacokinetics. finally a description of what mRNA-1647 actually is: mRNA-1647 contains 6 mRNAs that encode the full-length CMV gB and the pentameric gH/gL/UL128/UL130/UL131A glycoprotein complex. is that hexavalent? sounds a lot like comirnaty LNP-wise
so this "worked" in instantly euthanized rats five years ago, at least we know that protein was expressed at certain parts of the body, so that's what we've got. wonder what else is coming, this can't be all
oh the mRNA did not persist longer than three days when you killed all the rats by then? although i haven't gotten to the breeding study yet.
absolutely incredible. they had this stuff written up since 2017, just waiting on the right pandemic. mrna-1647 could be the placeholder for mrna-1273, covid 2p-S, or maybe mrna-1192, ebola glycoprotein, etc? these screenshots are both p302
so i've already been reading this for two hours now, gonna take a break.
let me just make this clear, Moderna had more than 2 years do do all kinds of safety studies. the documentation they submitted to the FDA is from a 2017 study.
p306 the moderna FDA submission for mrna-1273 begins. lots of weasely language about using mrna-1647 data
p308. so they mention lots and lots of studies they did on all these different animals, but then the nonclinical summary looks like this. insane.
oh yeah and there's 5 other moderna vaccines referenced.
p316 the genotoxicity of mRNA vaccines is mainly associated with the LNP formulation and to a lesser extent, the encoded antigen.
well at least they apparently did a genotox study or two. biontech didn't.
they had ralph baric build a mouse-cov-2 !! p317 @TheJikky out to get you from the start @BillyBostickson
p327 has an overview of all the studies, and 328 a comprehensive cliffnote of the moderna vaccine nonclinical work
page 330.
"well we found some genotoxicity and some minimal bone marrow damage but because it stays in your arm we think the risk is... low."
the EMA/FDA got this document and decided not to ask for any genotox from pfizer 😬
p364 details the genotox studies a bit closer. the in vitros were negative, yet the in vivo was.. positive. they did this one intravenously, but because the human one is IM, its gonna be fine. what the fuck. no idea what micronucleated means and if i open another tab, its over
p377 mrna-1647 study again. charles river is the company, has several facilities apparently
few hundred pages of the same (its literally the study and all the redacted stuff as well) then this on page 687: new genotox studies! and repro/fertility. so the first ~x hundred pages were v1 of the submission, and this is an update?
PEG-2000 only gets a single sentence for two studies though :(
p691 outlies the repro study. the pups had an immune response, woohey! 6 pups in 4 litters had skeletal aberrations, but they also had antibodies
and p695 closes with the "integrated overview and conclusions". two pages further up mentions the end of the phase 3 being close to finished. and that's it. anyone knowledgeable about moderna? was the mRNA-1647 swap known?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
the very first goddamn email: daszak says baric is working on nanoparticles, and baric is asked about sars glycoproteins he's making for a DARPA grant and they're trying to get them into bats
ADSYMPT - covid signs and symptoms
ADAE - adverse events
these are the symptoms that can lead to a "covid illness visit" except for 7 days after each dose.
these are the scraped results from both files. some of the "signs and symptoms of disease" from ADSYMPT don't translate directly to ADAE MedDRA terminology, for example fever=pyrexia, sore throat=oropharyngeal pain. take a good long look at it and let me know if it makes sense.
been looking at the latest pfizer puff piece. this is going to be a dump thread of links and files. both C4591031 and C4591007 are heavily represented on the EMA CDP portal. already did a thread on C4591031:
firstly, c4591031 has results on the EU CTR. results have been updated three times by now 👀 this includes substudies A-E so it's REALLY really long. c4591007 only has a protocol posted clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/tri…
the US CTR entry for c4591007 lists spanish sites, yet the EU CTR only has finland and poland 🤔
just gonna give some thoughts on the hypervax paper from a kraut healthcare worker perspective. HIM is "overall healthy (no chronic medications)", yet received regular blood draws from november 2019 onwards 🤔that's not how it works, labs come out of the budget
the single most frequent measurement is creatinine with 23 measurements, next ist small haemogram (blutbild) with 20, then total protein and urea with 19 each. most likely being treated by a nephrologist or a hausarzt (gp) for kidney issues.
the total number of measurements is striking: the study "only" drew blood 13 times, between august 2022 and october 2023, leaving ten blood draws between nov 2019 and july 2022. i reckon these ten blood draws were bunched towards the beginning and then once per quarter-year.
🚨some material i just have not gotten around to: ICAN received the first two PSURs for AstraZeneca and it's about as bad as you can imagine. icandecide.org/press-release/…
the documents in question are the first two PSURs, spanning dec 2020 -june2021 and june 2021 to dec 2021 respectively. PSURs 3 &4 for 2022 were released end of december on the EMA page for vaxzevria. EMA & FDA colluded to "flood the zone" EoY 2023 😉 ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/h…
as always, ICAN's assessment of the files is must-read material.