1. About that horse paste. The most important part of the story of ivermectin is who is pulling the strings to suppress evidence and persecute dissenting doctors. It's a tangled knot of greed and special interests, captured regulatory agencies and lots and lots of money. ....... 
2. The manual suggest swords are needed but maybe the pen can help. Start with the Clinton Health Africa Initiative and UNITAID, and investigate their ties with Big Pharma companies like merck, pfizer, moderna, etc.
3. The WHO webpage about Ivermectin was archived before they scrubbed it, so you can still read it here. The mectizan donation program estimates that blindness caused by onchocerciasis is increasingly rare after 25 years of Mectizan. archive.is/FizVA/
4.Merck donated Ivermectin free of charge for as long as it is needed in 1987.
4. How many are aware of this? Was this fairly portrayed by the media? How many read the transcript or watched the video of the wonderful Dr Tess Lawrie and Andrew Hill. rumble.com/vwfia3-a-lette…
5. More than a few of us are wondering why the regulators keep recommending against a drug which they are desperate to re patent and reformulate. And why does UNITAID pop up four times in the regulatory process.
6. TrialSite highlighted the ever widening chasm between the messaging and reality on the ground by contrasting the data from the US National Poison Data System hotline with the representation of these same facts by the FDA and entertainment media..trialsitenews.com/grotesque-conf…
7. ....as they transition from misinformation to outright lies. According to this data, 1443 Iv exposure related calls were made to the US national poison hotline from January through August 2021. All of these calls involved physician prescribed Ivermectin for human use, ....
8. ... not the veterinary formulation. Previous years show 435 to be a more usual number for this kind of call. Consider that in the same time frame there has been a 2344% rise in prescriptions for Ivermectin,
9. with prescriptions rising from 3000 per week pre-pandemic to 88000 per week in August 2021.
A categorical breakdown of the 1443 calls reveal there were:
- 0 deaths
- 11 major effects
- 91 moderate effects
- 148 minor effects
- 754 no effect non toxic
- 137 no follow up
A categorical breakdown of the 1443 calls reveal there were:
- 0 deaths
- 11 major effects
- 91 moderate effects
- 148 minor effects
- 754 no effect non toxic
- 137 no follow up
10. Only 22% of the total calls showed any material effect, with 78% of calls falling into the no problem category(or were aggregated under "not sure" or "no follow up").
https://twitter.com/i/status/1428904540229799946/
11. Contrast the messages about the danger of ivermectin with the data from the same hotline reporting hand sanitizer incidents. This shows a 58 % increase in calls for the same time period, with 3320 of these falling into the major, moderate, or minor categories, and 4 deaths.
12. This would suggest that hand sanitizer is far more dangerous than ivermectin, which exists as an inexpensive, out of patent drug formulation that’s treated over 4 billion people with an enviable safety record.
13. Quite how the FDA gets from this to the now infamous “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.” tweet is hard to fathom. Unless the FDA is getting their news from Rachel Maddow, which the timestamps on the tweets suggest.
https://twitter.com/US_FDA/status/1429050070243192839
14. It's worth repeating that this data originates as calls involving physician prescribed Ivermectin for human use. This not so subtle message , that ivermectin, a tried-and-tested drug, should only be given to animals, was slavishly echoed across the corporate media.
15. After the National Institutes of Health(NIH) provided a non-recommendation for the use of ivermectin in COVID-19, stating that there was “insufficient evidence to recommend either for or against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19.”, a FOIA response ......
16. ..showed that four members of the working group have a financial relationship with Merck. Including an extraordinary potential conflict of interest involving a $155 million grant for the study of ivermectin following this non-recommendation.
17. It's time to ask harder questions about the connections between the media, big pharma and the various regulatory bodies that together manage the public health system. #exithewho #wesayno #StoptheShots
referendums.co.za/@NoWHO
referendums.co.za/@NoWHO
@threadreaderapp unroll
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
