I participated in a Twitter space hosted by @katienotopoulos w/a lot of journalists
When I joined @Jason, one of Musk's apparatchiks, was badgering @drewharwell, a suspended reporter, and Jack Sweeney, the guy behind the accounts that tracked jets
🧵
@katienotopoulos@Jason@drewharwell 2. Jason was making the point that everyone was upset about the suspension, but we need to focus on the real point: IF YOU POSTED SOMEONE'S REAL TIME LOCATION AND SOMEONE DIED WOULD YOU FEEL BAD?
Drew made the point that this was a dumb question
3. Jason kept on asking it over and over again.
I think he thought this was a great way of redirecting the conversation and making Musk seem reasonable.
IS THIS THE KIND OF SOCIETY WE WANT TO LIVE IN? WHERE PEOPLE ARE PUT IN DANGER FROM BEING UNDER CONSTANT SURVEILLANCE?
4. I finally had enough. @katienotopoulos invited me to be a speaker so I interrupted
My point was: THE ENTIRE PREMISE OF THE QUESTION WAS A LIE.
The suspended journalists had not reported on Musk's real-time location!
They covered the fact that he suspended Sweeny's accounts
5. I said the bigger question is whether WE WANT TO LIVE IN A SOCIETY WHERE POWERFUL PEOPLE ARE ALLOWED TO LIE AGAIN AND AGAIN WITH IMPUNITY AND THEN USE THESE LIES TO JUSTIFY OTHERWISE INDEFENSIBLE ACTIONS
6. My other point was we can say we are concerned about the impact of social media use on people's safety BUT THIS IS NOT AN ISSUE LIMITED TO PRIVATE JETS.
MUSK HIMSELF WAS PUTTING PEOPLE AT RISK BY MAKING WILD ACCUSATIONS, INCLUDING THAT THEY WERE PEDOPHILES
7. I didn't realize it but, in the middle of my rant, Musk himself entered the room
8. Once I realized this, I shut up so Katie and Drew could ask him questions. Musk basically ignored the questions and kept repeating, "no doxxing" and "no special rules for journalists"
When Drew pressed him, he quickly bolted.
He does not like to be challenged or questioned.
9. Shortly after Musk left, THE SPACE WAS SHUT DOWN.
In fact, ALL SPACES WERE SHUT DOWN.
They weren't fully restored until tonight.
10. What was missing from @Jason's defense of Musk, and Musk's own position is CONTEXT.
Musk says he's for free speech but when people are saying things he doesn't like, he tries to shut them up.
We saw this a few weeks ago with the Musk parody accounts
11. Comedy was legal on Twitter until people started making fun of him. Then @DavidSacks another Musk buddy redefined parody as "fraud" and insisted Musk was doing us all a favor.
BUT IT GOES MUCH DEEPER THAN THIS.
12. You need to fully understand Musk's LONG history of saying he is for free speech but harshly cracking down on anyone who dares to criticize him.
13. In China, Tesla reportedly sought to leverage the power of China's authoritarian regime to silence critics.
Tesla reportedly "asked Beijing to use its censorship powers to block" critical posts
But after reporter Linette Lopez wrote critical stories about Tesla Musk accusing Lopez of conspiring with short sellers to trade on insider information, which is a crime
Musk had no proof but an army of minions to harass Lopez
15. The right to talk about joining a union is a key part of free speech rights for workers.
Musk, however, has sought to aggressively discourage unionization at Tesla. In a 2018 tweet, Musk threatened to rescind employee stock options at Tesla if workers decided to join a union
16. The Tesla NDA instructed employees that "they were not allowed to speak w/media w/o explicit written permission." But it did not say that labor law "protects employees when they speak with the media about working conditions [and[ labor disputes"
17. In 2018, pseudo-anonymous investor, Montana Skeptic, wrote extensively about Tesla stock
But in July 2018, Montana Skeptic shut down his Twitter account and stopped writing about Tesla. Why? Musk allegedly found out the identity of Montana Skeptic and alerted their employer
18. So yes, let's talk about free speech and let's talk about safety. But Twitter is a platform that is used by hundreds of millions of people.
THE SITE'S RULES SHOULD NOT BE DRIVEN BY THE QUIXOTIC INTERESTS OF ONE BILLIONAIRE
HE BOUGHT IT, BUT HE ALSO NEEDS USERS TO BUY IN
19. And Musk and his minions should stop gaslighting people about Musk being a champion of free speech.
He is not.
He is wealthy, and he bought the site.
That's it.
20. Everyone's safety is important. And it should go without saying but the people whose personal safety is most at risk on this site are not billionaires who can afford private jets and private security.
21. If this is my last thread on this site you can always find me here: popular.info/subscribe
22. If you think I’m exaggerating, these tweets are a good summary of @Jason’s argument in the Twitter Space
1. A member of the U.S. Special Forces was just arrested for using classified info to turn a 400K profit on Polymarket.
The company is CELEBRATING this scandal as evidence that "the system works."
But Polymarket's story doesn't add up.
Let's dig in.
🧵
2. Gannon Van Dyke, part of the Special Forces unit that captured former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, was indicted for misappropriating classified information to turn a 400K profit on Polymarket.
1. A tiny California tribe, the Yocha Dehe Wintun Nation, just donated $2 MILLION to MAGA Inc, Trump's Super PAC.
I decided to find out why.
It's an illustration of exactly how business is done in Trump’s Washington.
Follow along for details.
🧵
2. The Yocha Dehe operates the Cache Creek Casino Resort. For a decade, the Yocha Dehe has been in a legal dispute with the Scotts Valley tribe, which is trying to build a casino about 60 miles away.
3. For Scotts Valley to build their casion, they need a technical determination by the Interior Department that “restored lands” — property with both a historical and modern connection to the tribe.
That enables them to get the green light for gaming.
1. For $500,000, you can have a one-on-one meeting with Trump tomorrow, according to an email solicitation obtained by Popular Information.
Follow this thread for details.
🧵
2. The email from Sinan Kanatsiz offers a “one-on-one meeting and private photo with President Donald Trump” in exchange for a “contribution of $500,000 to TPUSA PAC.”
3. Kanatsiz describes his invitation as “strictly confidential and non-transferable.” The bottom of the message warns, “NOT FOR SHARING — CONFIDENTIAL.” A source shared the email on the condition of anonymity, fearing professional consequences for providing information to a journalist.
1. Yesterday, the NYT dropped a bombshell: Saudi Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS) has been aggressively lobbying Trump not to end the fighting and pushing him to launch a ground operation.
Why would Trump listen?
Follow the money.
2. Oddly, the NYT does not mention that earlier this year the Saudi government financed a $7 billion development with the Trump Organization.
These licensing deals are essentially all profit for Trump. It's putting money right in his pocket.
3. The NYT story also does not mention that Trump’s chief negotiator, his son-in-law Jared Kushner, is being paid tens of millions annually by the Saudi Public Investment Fund (PIF), which is controlled by MBS.
And Kushner is actively soliciting MBS for billions more right now.
1. HealthEquity, the nation's largest administrator of health savings accounts, just donated $1 MILLION to Trump's Super PAC.
Previsouly, the company had never donated more than 5K to any political committee
WTF is going on?
🧵
2. Today, Americans are facing dramatically increased health care costs, with millions losing coverage and 1 in 3 cutting daily living expenses to cover medical bills.
For the HSA ndustry, however, these are boom times
3. In a triumphant March 17 earnings call, HealthEquity, the nation’s largest administrator of HSAs, reported “accelerating earnings power… significant margin expansion, and record HSA sales.”
Founder Stephen Neeleman attributed the success to Trump policy, including the "Big Beautiful Bill"