Thread by @ZakugaMignon

1/8) — Ai works like the human brain? —
Machine learning =/= Ai learning. If it were like human learning or Ai it could learn to respect artists' choices, however it can’t. It’s just code. It could learn to develop its own art styles. It cannot.

2/8 It can only mimic existing styles created by artists. This is not inspiration like the artist (will be covered below). It could learn to place its own personal touches and signature aesthetics. It cannot.

3/8 Artists often have a signature style or touch they will place in artwork, an example is always making eyes larger or smaller than realistic proportions, however “Ai” can only read the data it’s given and replicated the art it has which causes dramatically different styles and

renders each time it is not static, but programmed to be dynamic. Key term here is programmed.

4/8 — How is it different from an artist being inspired by another artist? —

Artists can take inspiration from other artists but they will put their own personal preferences into the artwork. Ai cannot recreate a personal touch because it’s only relying on the art fed to it.

5/8 Artists will learn art from scratch starting from “learning artist to pro artist” and along this journey creating familiar brush strokes patterns and certain ways of anatomy. They can be inspired by anothers they will fall into a category of their own becoming a new style.

6/8 Ai can never do this; it can never have a journey of learning from scratch and creating its own unique way of painting, because all it’s doing is mixing up artwork within its datasets. This is why every piece of Ai “art” prompt you see can be linked to an existing art style

7/8 It simply just recreates what it’s given.

8/8 I’m creating chains of replies to the most commonly seen question for east of replies. More Q&A is to come #SupportHumanArtists #noaiart