Ship 29 is the newest oddity at the Production Site, but we may know what's happening this time around. Let's take a look at this new article that SpaceX is producing, and why we believe it may be a Structural Test Article. (1/13)

📸 @ChameleonCir
@ChameleonCir Starting off looking at S29's nosecone, we can see some TPS pins on the side. This is likely because S29 was intended to be a normal Ship. With the cone now outside of the tent and having other work done, the pins will likely not be finished. (2/13)

📸 @nomadd13
@ChameleonCir @nomadd13 Well then, it's probably just another S26, right? That was a possibility until SpaceX began properly developing the flap mounting surfaces. This typically happens after tiling, and if this nose has no tiles, it would burn up before needing flaps. (3/13)

📸 @RGVaerialphotos
@ChameleonCir @nomadd13 @RGVaerialphotos A nosecone test article would need these mounting points though, because flap simulators are installed for the structural testing. (4/13)

📸 @BocaChicaGal
@ChameleonCir @nomadd13 @RGVaerialphotos @BocaChicaGal If this is for a test article, we expect that the tip of the nosecone would be removed, similar to what happened to SN12's nosecone nearly two years ago. This is yet to happen, but we anticipate that it will soon enough. (5/13)

📸 @BocaChicaGal @RGVaerialphotos
@ChameleonCir @nomadd13 @RGVaerialphotos @BocaChicaGal Now, let's move down to the Payload Bay. It had a fairly normal trip through the production process until SpaceX installed only a stripped-down base portion of the dispenser. (6/13)

📸 @NicAnsuini
@ChameleonCir @nomadd13 @RGVaerialphotos @BocaChicaGal @NicAnsuini This piece did not have the expected electrical parts and systems that a working PEZ dispenser has. Typically a PEZ dispenser is installed as one unit, with all of the hardware preinstalled. (7/13)

📸 @StarshipGazer @NicAnsuini
@ChameleonCir @nomadd13 @RGVaerialphotos @BocaChicaGal @NicAnsuini @StarshipGazer Typically TPS pins application occurs before PEZ dispenser processing. The only time it didn't was with S26, and we know how that went. So this is consistent with the nosecone having no heatshield. (8/13)

📸 @chrisk_91
@ChameleonCir @nomadd13 @RGVaerialphotos @BocaChicaGal @NicAnsuini @StarshipGazer @chrisk_91 The various aft sections are also suggesting something weird. Inside Tent 2, we are able to see S27's aft in the back, and S28's aft just in front based on what we have tracked. The 3rd aft section in front should be S29, but…. those are TPS pins. (9/13)

📸 @RGVaerialphotos
@ChameleonCir @nomadd13 @RGVaerialphotos @BocaChicaGal @NicAnsuini @StarshipGazer @chrisk_91 This is a brand new aft section, one that should have been pinned after S29 was evidently decided to not have tiles. With this in mind, we believe that it may be for S30, leaving S29’s aft missing. (10/13)
@ChameleonCir @nomadd13 @RGVaerialphotos @BocaChicaGal @NicAnsuini @StarshipGazer @chrisk_91 If you haven't checked it out yet, we have a Discord server where all of our tracking happens. We also have a bot that shows what's been spotted for the various Ships. Taking a look at S29, the parts seem to be limited to the top half. (11/13)

discord.gg/wbz2MssN6Q
@ChameleonCir @nomadd13 @RGVaerialphotos @BocaChicaGal @NicAnsuini @StarshipGazer @chrisk_91 Various parts of the Nosecone Testing Cage have been seeing work recently as well. The base has begun being reassembled, and the black tip that goes on the Nosecone has been moved near the base. (12/13)

📸 @RGVaerialphotos
@ChameleonCir @nomadd13 @RGVaerialphotos @BocaChicaGal @NicAnsuini @StarshipGazer @chrisk_91 All of this suggests that S29 may be an article used to verify the design of Starship's upper half during flight, like what was done with SN12’s nosecone last year. Hopefully, we'll get to see this put together soon and, more importantly, pass testing. (13/13)

📸 @BocaChicaGal

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Ring Watchers

The Ring Watchers Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RingWatchers

Nov 2
The 3 interstage clamps that connect Starship and Superheavy together are a critical piece in the Starship full stack, but there isn’t much documentation of how they work and how they have changed through the generations of vehicles. Let’s change that. (1/14)

📸: @ChameleonCir Image
@ChameleonCir Two designs of these clamps have been used on Starship to date, with test article B2.1 being the first to have them. Notice how they have a much wider lip. This style was used until S21 and B6. (2/14)

📸: @BocaChicaGal
@ChameleonCir @BocaChicaGal The old style is important to note because this was the only time where we got to see the actuation mechanism in action. A hydraulic actuator would simply be able to push and pull on it to lock and unlock, with a large spring pressing on it while locked. (3/14)

📸: @BocaChicaGal
Read 14 tweets
Oct 30
And that’s the end of that! During a test that occurred earlier this week, EDome was tested to failure… but you may remember that it, like that one kid from high school that was WAY older than everyone else, has failed before. Here’s what’s up. (1/12)
Made with the 3rd and 5th smooth domes manufactured, EDome was stacked on June 3rd and rolled out to the pad on the 8th. During its stay at the Launch Site, EDome wouldn’t be tested, rolling back to Sanchez on August 24th. (2/12)

📸: @LabPadre @NASASpaceflight @RGVaerialphotos
@LabPadre @NASASpaceflight @RGVaerialphotos EDome would then head over to the new Massey’s site on September 22nd. Once at Massey’s it was placed on a new concrete pad and was attached to the tank farm. (3/12)

📸: @LabPadre @RGVaerialphotos
Read 12 tweets
Aug 28
12 days ago we tweeted about some strange production deviations spotted with Ship 26, and today's thread is an update on that situation with additional observations. If anything, we're in for an interesting ride with S26. (1/9)
Since that tweet, S26's nosecone has seemingly been completely detiled, with the TPS attachment pins remaining attached. It is currently unknown if SpaceX will remove the pins from the 4 sections that are pinned, however we think this is unlikely. (2/9)

📸: @BocaChicaGal
@BocaChicaGal The sections that had deviated past the TPS stations remain unpinned and/or untiled. Such an extended duration away from the pinning robots and tiling stations strongly indicates that this process may not occur at all. (3/9)

📸: @RGVaerialphotos
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(