Ship 29 is the newest oddity at the Production Site, but we may know what's happening this time around. Let's take a look at this new article that SpaceX is producing, and why we believe it may be a Structural Test Article. (1/13)
@ChameleonCir Starting off looking at S29's nosecone, we can see some TPS pins on the side. This is likely because S29 was intended to be a normal Ship. With the cone now outside of the tent and having other work done, the pins will likely not be finished. (2/13)
@ChameleonCir@nomadd13 Well then, it's probably just another S26, right? That was a possibility until SpaceX began properly developing the flap mounting surfaces. This typically happens after tiling, and if this nose has no tiles, it would burn up before needing flaps. (3/13)
@ChameleonCir@nomadd13@RGVaerialphotos A nosecone test article would need these mounting points though, because flap simulators are installed for the structural testing. (4/13)
@ChameleonCir@nomadd13@RGVaerialphotos@BocaChicaGal If this is for a test article, we expect that the tip of the nosecone would be removed, similar to what happened to SN12's nosecone nearly two years ago. This is yet to happen, but we anticipate that it will soon enough. (5/13)
@ChameleonCir@nomadd13@RGVaerialphotos@BocaChicaGal Now, let's move down to the Payload Bay. It had a fairly normal trip through the production process until SpaceX installed only a stripped-down base portion of the dispenser. (6/13)
@ChameleonCir@nomadd13@RGVaerialphotos@BocaChicaGal@NicAnsuini This piece did not have the expected electrical parts and systems that a working PEZ dispenser has. Typically a PEZ dispenser is installed as one unit, with all of the hardware preinstalled. (7/13)
@ChameleonCir@nomadd13@RGVaerialphotos@BocaChicaGal@NicAnsuini@StarshipGazer@chrisk_91 All of this suggests that S29 may be an article used to verify the design of Starship's upper half during flight, like what was done with SN12’s nosecone last year. Hopefully, we'll get to see this put together soon and, more importantly, pass testing. (13/13)
The 3 interstage clamps that connect Starship and Superheavy together are a critical piece in the Starship full stack, but there isn’t much documentation of how they work and how they have changed through the generations of vehicles. Let’s change that. (1/14)
@ChameleonCir Two designs of these clamps have been used on Starship to date, with test article B2.1 being the first to have them. Notice how they have a much wider lip. This style was used until S21 and B6. (2/14)
@ChameleonCir@BocaChicaGal The old style is important to note because this was the only time where we got to see the actuation mechanism in action. A hydraulic actuator would simply be able to push and pull on it to lock and unlock, with a large spring pressing on it while locked. (3/14)
And that’s the end of that! During a test that occurred earlier this week, EDome was tested to failure… but you may remember that it, like that one kid from high school that was WAY older than everyone else, has failed before. Here’s what’s up. (1/12)
Made with the 3rd and 5th smooth domes manufactured, EDome was stacked on June 3rd and rolled out to the pad on the 8th. During its stay at the Launch Site, EDome wouldn’t be tested, rolling back to Sanchez on August 24th. (2/12)
@LabPadre@NASASpaceflight@RGVaerialphotos EDome would then head over to the new Massey’s site on September 22nd. Once at Massey’s it was placed on a new concrete pad and was attached to the tank farm. (3/12)
12 days ago we tweeted about some strange production deviations spotted with Ship 26, and today's thread is an update on that situation with additional observations. If anything, we're in for an interesting ride with S26. (1/9)
Since that tweet, S26's nosecone has seemingly been completely detiled, with the TPS attachment pins remaining attached. It is currently unknown if SpaceX will remove the pins from the 4 sections that are pinned, however we think this is unlikely. (2/9)
@BocaChicaGal The sections that had deviated past the TPS stations remain unpinned and/or untiled. Such an extended duration away from the pinning robots and tiling stations strongly indicates that this process may not occur at all. (3/9)