Considering a move out of academia, but don't know where to start?
Before you dig into my recommended resources (at the end of this thread), the first, hardest, & most important step is believing that it's okay to pursue an #altac career.
Truly. I promise that it's okay. 1/
It's so easy to feel like you're a failure. And it's easy for some academics to judge a career choice that they have never made & don't understand.
Believe me. I've been called a "sell-out", "soulless", & "anti-academic". I lack "passion." I "couldn't handle" academia. 2/
Meh. The name-calling used to bother me, quite a lot actually, but it doesn't anymore. Because they're wrong.
First, check my CV 🔥 I crushed it in academia by every measure. I'm not a failure, far from it. I'm a successful, passionate, multi award-winning researcher. 3/
Second, I know how much happier I am in my tech career vs. my academic one. If that makes me a "sell-out" then... 🙃
Academia isn't a morally or intellectually superior career. It's just a job. It's okay to pursue a different career path. I have, as have many other phds. 4/
And, as @BeyondProf likes to say: "smart people work everywhere."
If you want to move out of academia, start with their podcast. Listen to the whole thing, trust me.
Everything I've learned about searching & applying for #altac jobs is here. 5/
Start conducting informational interviews. Talk to academics who have transitioned into #altac careers. Figure out which career sounds most interesting to you Maybe that's UX, maybe that's something else. 6/
Remember, UX is a science. You won't learn everything about UX in a few weeks, months, or even a few years.
But, combined with your academic research experience, you can teach yourself enough about UX to land an exciting entry-level position & continue learning from there. 8/
Leaving academia is scary. It can feel like all your sacrifices were for nothing.
Don't buy into the sunk cost fallacy.
You are intelligent, competent, & have valuable marketable skills. Don't let a job define your self worth. And don't stay in a job if you are unhappy 💛 /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Recently, I told a new friend that I used to have longer hair. They wanted to see a picture, so I pulled out my drivers license from 2020.
They were shocked: “that’s not the same person.”
They’re right. I’m not the same person. Leaving academia has changed me substantially. 1/
In 2020, I was a first-year post-doc. That year, I won 2 dissertation awards & published 7 first-author papers - working was the only way I knew how to deal with the stress of the pandemic.
But it still felt like it wasn’t enough. I wasn’t productive enough. I wasn’t enough. 2/
Even after all my successes, I felt imposter syndrome every day.
Was I even a good researcher? Did anyone care at all about my work? Would I get a TT job or fail horribly?
I started taking SSRIs for anxiety. I upped my dose as I watched the academic job market collapse.
Last December, I decided to leave my prestigious post-doc fellowship & successful academic research program in order to pursue a UX career.
It's been one year since I made that choice. My only regret is not leaving academia sooner. 1/
When I decided to leave academia, I was deeply unhappy. But I was also terrified that I wouldn't like any other career.
I had conducted research on infant emotion perception for 10+ years. How could I possibly conduct research on anything else? It was my *passion*. 2/
I have been a UX Researcher for seven months now. And it's everything I've wanted in a career.
My research topic (new AR/VR tech) is fascinating. I spend all day conducting research. I learn so much from my coworkers - all of whom are incredibly bright & talented. 3/
I work in a cross-functional design pod with designers, engineers, & managers. I am currently the only UX researcher in my pod.
Often, my pod-mates will say "you're the researcher - how do you think we should do this?"
At no point in academia did I have this much power. 1/
In academia, where everyone is a researcher, there is so much arguing about the best way to do things. I constantly debated with advisors, reviewers, & labmates about how to conduct my research.
This is how projects ended up taking 5+ years to finish... 2/
In UX, I have so much freedom to design, conduct, analyze, & write studies the way I want to. This is what I always wanted in my academic research, but never achieved.
I finish my projects in a few months, because I make many of the decisions. I drive the projects. 3/
Last October, when I was applying to TT faculty jobs, my anxiety was unbearable.
I had 15 first-author pubs, two diss awards, & a prestigious post-doc fellowship. I had devoted hours upon hours to diversity-related service roles.
But I didn't know if that was enough. 1/
I felt like I had done everything I possibly could, but I still wondered...
Would the search committees like my research?
Or would they think it was boring?
Would they see that I worked hard?
Or would they question my commitment to academia?
Would this all be for nothing?
2/
I had sat on a search committee. I had seen many talented phds not get interviews. I knew that academic hiring was idiosyncratic.
And still. I hoped against hope that academic hiring was meritocratic. I wanted to believe that if I worked hard "enough", I would get a job.
3/
This can be a touchy subject, but you will make considerably more $ outside of academia. Do you have student loans or family members to support? Do you want to buy a house or travel? A higher salary will help you do these things. 2/
2. Where do I (not) want to live?
You will have far more flexibility in where you live outside of academia (with remote work, your choices are unlimited!). And if certain places are hostile to you due to your race, gender, or sexual orientation, you can avoid them easily. 3/
PhD students: if you want to pursue a TT faculty position, I highly recommend sitting on a hiring committee in your dept. Check out how the hiring process works!
I sat on a hiring committee as a 4th year phd, & what I saw made me reconsider my entire career trajectory. 1/
The sheer number of applicants will shock you. We had 120 people (a low #) applying for one position. We could only choose three for on-site interviews.
And if you still have any delusions that TT hiring is merit-based, sitting on a hiring committee will fix that real quick. 2/
I saw applicants rejected for having a "boring research program" or not being "committed" enough to academia.
I saw committee members have clear "favorites" who were pushed along.
I seemed to be the only one who read the diversity or teaching statements. 3/