š§µ 1/
Seems that training for all AI systems needs to start at a set starting point of a specific topic in order to allow that topic to act as a tuner that can add to the overall collective system intelligence of some topic that is in the same realm or parallel to another topic
š§µ 2/
Example: Person w/a plumbing issue, people would start at a LLM chat interface specific for plumbing, and it would be trained and have input coming from that specific topic. It also seems like there could also be some type of expert 'contributor' input vs 'asker' output.
š§µ 3/
The contributor would be an expert plumber who could be tested by the LLM chat interface and upon passing a specific level of competency (would need a verification process the contributor was not just copy/pasting from Google or using the LLM to copy/paste answers)
š§µ 4/
That contributor would be able to answer a specific set of questions, once they pass the contributor status test, and add to the body of knowledge for each topic, and also be added as a competent service provider when each 'asker' obtains the answer to their plumbing issue
š§µ 5/
This would create a more balanced feedback loop and would ensure that the service provider was competent to add to the body of knowledge or at least was on par with a qualified service provider. The service provider pays to add knowledge and become a listed service provider
š§µ 6/
The important thing here is that it keeps cruft out of the system and allows users to obtain self-service answers to solve a problem, with a back-up safety of a qualified service provider if the user can't perform or would rather hire someone = holy grail of q&a search
š§µ 7/
The service provider can register as a contributor with KYC and a single crypto wallet to obtain payments in order to establish a trail of truth on the transaction. The LLM chat would act as a "tornado cash" point of mixing customer funds to keep customer's wallets safe.
š§µ 8/
The sticking point is, IMO, the requirement for all of this to be native to being decentralized from the start. I believe @akashnet_@gregosuri are onto something and using #Handshake (LearnHNS.com) non-ICANN domain names for freedom to begin w/o IRS interference
š§µ 9/
With the current upgraded ASICS miners from @BITMAINtech for $HNS (new $HNS miners sold out in 27 seconds) - and the transition of GPUs that mined ETH, and transition to @akashnet_, the sticking points are already there to be developed upon.
š§µ 10/
I see this as being the next bit advance in society as individuals look for ways to extend the lifespan of owned objects vs buying new ones that can break.
'Repairing' will continue to be cheaper than 'buying new' with very few exceptions.
š§µ 11/
**The next 12-18 months look to put more financial pressure on the majority of the population, and a lack of funds to buy new will further push the cycle of companies having to cut costs (decr quality), raise prices on worse goods, w/customer service being contracts w/LLMs
š§µ 12/
The surviving middle class will participate the most in this, on both sides of the consumer and the service provider. This can create a survival model for society in a repair-economy while the governments "figure it out" which of course, will take way too long.
š§µ 13/
This is why it's important to keep the government out of this style of system from the start. They have no concept of being fiscally responsible, and the only answer is to break the cycle at a time when they will want to 'bleed-out' citizens in an attempt to 'save them'
š§µ 14/
I don't see a preventative path ahead w/Japan (BoJ) kicking open the financial dam (may have been the reason Shinzo Abe was assassinated) that leg-swept the US economy/US dollar dependency. I see this as being an available life-boat using the tools we currently have
š§µ 15/
I believe a few could work together and draw inspiration from @LynAldenContact@Breedlove22@saylor@elonmusk and others who are transparent and unafraid to read the writing on the wall of what's on the horizon. This shouldn't be taken lightly in the slightest. #Action2023
ā¢ ā¢ ā¢
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
š§µ1/
My ICANN/FBI/Political 2023 prediction:
TLDR:ā ļøā”ļøā¤ļøāš„š
ICANN will designate #ENS and #UnstoppableDomains as potential dangers to the domain name space. They are a centralized target (ENS + UD = 10 TLDs) vs. #Handshake with over 8,600,658 TLDs.
šā¤ļøāš„TheShake.xyzššÆ
š§µ2/
This will be highlighted by a handful of examples where users clicked on a link they saw as a domain name (it has the dot, and was linked, so I clicked it) and were opened up to some type of malware that installed IP redirects for the most common websites (google/amazon).
š§µ3/
This will happen during a crash of the economy when ICANN can save the day by doing anything to curtail theft online. This will have the side benefit of normalizing people to seeing ICANN as a "safety net" of sorts for the internet. But then...
š§µ1/
10-21-22: Internet Framentation Panel Discussion
- James Bladel (VP of policy @GoDaddy) stated
"I would propose that we would turn the multi-stakeholder model inside out. Normally I think we're familiar with everyone coming from government/industry/technology/academia..."
š§µ2/
"...and bringing our perspective into ICANN to advance the work but I think that has to flow the other direction as well and we have to be comfortable taking our knowledge/expertise & our appreciation for the multi-stakeholder model back to our day jobs..."
š§µ3/
"...whether that's in government or industry and recognizing when maybe an attempting piece of legislation - or a new protocol - undermines the interoperability of the internet..."