Want to increase your chances of developing dysautonomia? Get vaccinated!
New study in Nature Cardiovascular Research shows 2.2x increase in risk of dysautonomia diagnosis in 90 days after COVID jab vs. 90 days before. No increase after COVID Dx. 🧵
Symptoms of dysautonomia include: tremors, breathing difficulties, temperature regulation problems, an inability to stay upright, vertigo, fainting, irregular heartbeat, gastrointestinal problems, fatigue and exercise intolerance, brain fog, sensory sensitivity, migraines & more!
While you're at it, you can also increase your chances of being diagnosed with myocarditis, POTS, mast cell disorder, UTI, dizziness, lower back pain, fatigue, edema, hyperlipidemia, anemia, hypertension, anxiety, depression, GERD, cellulitis, eczema & headache. #safeandeffective
The paper also compares risk of diagnosis after jab vs. COVID infection, but not among those already infected & vice versa. Also doesn't look at boosters. So the real world implications may be worse. Vax & COVID populations very different so comparison is confounded = unreliable.
Added later: risk of some conditions increases more after COVID diagnosis than jab. But since vaxxed + COVID Dx were excluded from the study, we don't know whether vax protects from (or worsens) any of these conditions -- including likelihood of COVID diagnosis.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
New FOIA reveals that as early as August 2020, the CDC was expecting up to 1,000 VAERS reports **per day** for COVID Vaccines "with up to 40% of the reports serious in nature." This represents a 600% increase with 8 times the rate of serious reports. 🧵 jackanapes.substack.com/p/foiad-contra…
In late August 2020, the CDC contracted with General Dynamics to handle VAERS reports for COVID-19 vaccines. The contract anticipated up to 1,000 reports per day, with up to 40% of them serious in nature. The value of the year-long contract was $9.45 million.
This means that months before the EUA of any COVID vaccines, the CDC anticipated up to a 600% increase over the average annual number of VAERS reports in recent years with 8 times the rate of serious reports.
How long did the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID vaccine clinical trial last?
Short answer: 97 days.
When unblinding began on December 14, 2020, the trial subjects had been in the trial on average for 97 days. That's 3 months plus a week.
See 🧵for the long answer.👇
The first subjects recruited to phase 2/3 were given their first dose on July 27, 2020. From then to Dec. 14 is 140 days, or over 4 1/2 months.
But many subjects were recruited long after July 27. In fact, one subject had their first dose just 3 days before unblinding began!
Hold on a second -- they weren't all unblinded on Dec 14. Shouldn't we count how long each person was in the trial before being unblinded? If you count that way, the average subject was in the trial for 137 days before unblinding (with a max. of 210 days and min. of 10 days).
Germany's Federal Institute for Population Research: "there is a strong association between the onset of vaccination programmes and the fertility decline nine months after." Found no association w/COVID or unemployment-- only jabs! bit.ly/BiBFertility
But they nerf the conclusions! Despite noting that "implementation of [jab] programs in both Germany and Sweden coincide very well with a distinct change in fertility levels exactly nine months later...fertility rates remained at reduced level during the entire 1st half of 2022"/
They conclude it was "a reaction to the changes in life circumstances that were anticipated as societies were to open up...[and] as some prospective parents may have postponed a decision...until after securing a vaccination for themselves." But that can't explain sustained drop!
Hot off the presses! Our paper "Censorship and Suppression of Covid-19 Heterodoxy: Tactics and Counter-Tactics" was just published in Minerva, a journal published by Springer in Social Studies of Science.
Abstract: “The emergence of COVID-19 has led to numerous controversies over COVID-related knowledge and policy. To counter the perceived threat from doctors and scientists who challenge the official position of governmental and intergovernmental health authorities,
some supporters of this orthodoxy have moved to censor those who promote dissenting views. The aim of the present study is to explore the experiences and responses of highly accomplished doctors and research scientists from different countries...
A couple of days ago I tweeted about a new study showing that immune system changes from mRNA vaccines can be inherited by offspring. The tweet had an error so I deleted it, promising a new one. Here is my Substack on it, w/very short summary thread 🧵 jackanapes.substack.com/p/new-pre-prin…
Paper found that mRNA injections have long-lasting suppressive effects on adaptive immunity outside the targeted virus/antigen, but they do provide protection against the pathogen they are coded for. Mice injected w/mRNA flu vaccine were more susceptible to Candida infections.
Improved protection against flu was passed on to offspring, but the authors did not test for (or did not report on) the heritability of the detrimental effects of mRNA injections on the immune system. So we don't know if the detrimental effects of mRNA injections were passed on.
Recently, law professor & tireless Big Pharma cheerleader Dorit Reiss .@doritmi attacked Jessica Rose's VAERS analysis, claiming she didn't know what she was talking about and was unqualified. What irony! (1/4) jessicar.substack.com/p/a-new-online…
If Jessica is unqualified to analyze VAERS despite her advanced degrees in applied math, immunology, virology, etc. that makes .@doritmi eminently *less* qualified. Thus by her own standards, she does not have the relevant expertise to critique anyone's VAERS analysis. (2/4)
.@doritmi praised CDC's safety monitoring, saying: "CDC routinely monitors VAERS data to detect patterns. For COVID-19 vaccines, CDC also engaged in enhanced surveillance." I guess she hasn't heard that the CDC has admitted that they didn't! (3/4) jackanapes.substack.com/p/new-foia-rel…