C🅰️tSE Profile picture
Dec 25, 2022 12 tweets 6 min read Read on X
$ASTS satellite #BlueWalker3 in orbit testing is ongoing.

It is the cutting edge of 5g Non-Terrestrial-Network NTN, Direct-To-Handset, DTH, technology.

It has a lot of interesting design choices.

Selected, in tech, standard and regulatory terms as it was purpose built.

1/n
Previous schematic of the transparent satellite AST uses is one of two NTN DTH architectures supported by the global 3GPP 5g standard.

The alternative AST opted out of has parts, or all, of the base-station placed onboard the satellite, whereas ASTs is on earth.

2/n
Starlink DTH is an add-on functionality to an existing architecture built for another purpose. It uses the other architecture.

This has several implications.

For handoff and multi connectivity.

But importantly ..

3/n
Having the eNodeB or base-station on the ground like AST does allows access to it and it allows use of COTS cutting edge hardware like Nokia single-RAN Airscale.

AST has been working with Nokia Bell Labs for two years to integrate assuring best possible technology.
4/n
Satellite communications payload is another choice where AST stands out. It is typical GEO (high altitude) satellite specs, but placed in LEO (low altitude).

A bit like putting an ocean-liner in a pond it might seem.

5/n
That allows for more narrow beams using less power, yet creating high sihnal strengths.

The win is three fold. Good mapping/resolution. High spectrum reuse and high modulation.

Resulting in good coverage and high throughput.

6/n
Low Earth Orbit has these benefits. Low RTT latency is one. Essential to work with 5g.

But also problems. Latency is still higher than terrestrial towers. Doppler shift needs to be handled and Farraday rotation of the polarization.

These have tweaks that can be tuned.

7/n
But tuning takes time.

I will quote @steve_larrison here.

”Testing is a process, not an event.”

Initial results < final results.

But there is more to architecture.

AST BlueBird servicelinks are 20 degrees above horizon.

8/n
That is another extreme design choice made possible by the huge 20 meter square array. As you need all of it to make a so narrow and strong beam.

The BlueWalker3 test satellite will generate such smsll cells 30-35 degrees above horizon as its phased array is smaller.

9/n
$AST uses fixed cell sites and steerable beams. Beams that are made more narrow and elliptical near the edge of the satellite firld of view in order to cast circular beamcells of uniform size onto the surface of the earth. It does not use moving cells.

10/n
The backhaul, or feeder link, field of view is even wider. It works down to 10 degrees above horizon as its antenna is a steerable 70 cm dish connecting to huge steerable dishes at the gateways.

11/n
There is much more, to tell, about the design choices made.

One is that the satellite is FPGA, or software defined. It means they can patch and tweak a lot during in orbit tests.

I will just summarize, for now, that the choices made are very wise as you scrutinize them.
12/12

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with C🅰️tSE

C🅰️tSE Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CatSE___ApeX___

Apr 11
🚨STARLINK DRAINS BATTERY 🚨

Why the Starlink 🪫 d2c earth moving cells are a really bad design choice can fill a book.

Carrying around an app that rapidly drains your battery in a disaster scenario isn’t optimal.

1/n
I’d like to focus not on how these rapid-fire beam to beam handovers causes dropped texts. Not on how that type of beams cause more border interference. Etc.

But on battery.

Starlink 🪫 d2c does not like
AST 🔋SpaceMobile fix the beam onto you with adaptive beamforming.

2/ Image
Starlink 🪫 d2c does just shines their beams down in a static fixed manner and as the satellites traverse the sky you are in a whole set of beams that hand over to eachother,

It does not track you.

3/
Read 6 tweets
Mar 8
🚨FCC WAIVER IMPLICATIONS🚨

📓DEEPDIVE DD EXPLAINED 👨🏼‍💻

Let’s start:

The way you can differentiate emmissions in space [where] and in time [when] and in strength [how much] you can also differentiate in the frequenzy domain [which channel].

That you transmit in.

🧶🐈‍⬛

1/n
The transmissions are ”good signals” if they’re [when], [where], [as strong] and [which channel] combo that is needed to do the transmission that is sought for.

Another combo is ”a waste”.

But some other combos also do harm.
”Bad signal”

2/n
This is a result showing AST SpaceMobile technology to maximize the signal to which channel it is wanted in (blue) ”good signal” while minimizing it elsewhere, which is adjacent channels. (Green). ”Bad signal”

This is industry excellence.

3/n Image
Read 15 tweets
Feb 15
🚨SPACEMOBILE $ASTS FULL FCC GRANT FOR 🇺🇸 BLOCK 1 β-TESTS🚨

✅$ASTS REGULATORY READINESS NOW ON PAR WITH STARLINK D2C

✅$ASTS TECHNOLOGICAL READINEDS WAY BETTER,

⏳ WHICH IS ABOUT TO BE SHOWCASED 🎬🎥🍿

🧶🐈‍⬛

1/n Image
Image
Image
As a ten tweet primer the competition in the form of Starlink regenerative architecture(green👇) is having severe problems with handovers.

As also can be seen AST is a different architecture altogether.

You’ll notice:

One single core.
gNBs (5G)

V/S

Two cores
eNB & gNB

2/n Image
But it is far from the only differentiator.

Here is a primer to another difference needed as background.

Starlink uses earth moving cells, EMC.

AST SpaceMobile uses earth fixed cells, EFC. Picture hex grids all over the planet each cell having it’s own cell ID.

Fixed.

3/n Image
Image
Image
Read 22 tweets
Feb 8
Welcome to todays episode of

MAKING MICRONS

Prsenting is me, CatSE, to walk you through the wonders of advanced phased arrays.

Todays subheading is

COMPARISON.

We’ll relate micron generations to eachother and to others arrays.

🧶🐈‍⬛

Let’s start!

1/n Image
The Block1 micron is a panel about 30 millimeters thick and 644 x 1,288
millimeters wide.

On one side antennas and on the other solar panels.

The antennas have a spacing that corresponds to a certain spectrum band.

The larger the spacing the lower the frequenzy.

2/n Image
You will notice that the antenna element spacing differs between satellite arrays that do Lowband, Midband and C-band respectively.

And that you can choose spacing to capture a certain range.

For $ASTS tech that range is wide it differs 1:1.55 between upper and lower bound.

3/ Image
Read 23 tweets
Jan 6
Small update.

Starlink beam diameter of 50 km. (Blue)

Advertised AST midband beam diameter is 24 km for comparison.(Red)

What it means practically is that spectum deployed with Starlink d2c will be used by 3.3 x more users per MHz.

Cutting area SE to 1/3 by this metric alone. Image
Image
-It’s called SpectRum with an R, cat.

-Right. My mistake. I like all sorts of Rum

🍹 🌈🛜 no offense intended.

-What is ”area spectral efficiency, cat?

-It is the key performance metric of an 3GPP NTN system.

-What is it made of and why is it important?

-I’m glad you asked
- We could first get more detailed and say that it is the mean area spectral efficiency that is key. Not the peak area spectral efficiency.

-Yeah, or alternatively we coukd simplify the concept instead of making it more complex. I’m not following, cat.

-Ah. Eli 5?

-Yes Please.
Read 50 tweets
Dec 27, 2024
The case for Low Earth orbit radar.

And sharing spectrum between DoD and Telecom.

This image shows the Chinese bomber fleet range. Previous and that of H-20 bomber project a bomber similar to the US flying wing stealth bombers.

As can be seen Hawaii is now within range.

1/n Image
Image
A bit smaller regional nuclear capable strike aircraft like this one shown yesterday (JH-XX ?) are likely capable of reaching places like Guam and Japan.

The two types of aircraft are built for stealth, low observability. And likely capable of electronic warfare.

2/n Image
Australia ponders buting the B21 as a strategic deterrent.

It is the most modern US stealth bomber and is capable of reaching chinese airforce bases.

The opposite would be true of the chinese equivallent.

3/n Image
Image
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(