$ASTS satellite #BlueWalker3 in orbit testing is ongoing.
It is the cutting edge of 5g Non-Terrestrial-Network NTN, Direct-To-Handset, DTH, technology.
It has a lot of interesting design choices.
Selected, in tech, standard and regulatory terms as it was purpose built.
1/n
Previous schematic of the transparent satellite AST uses is one of two NTN DTH architectures supported by the global 3GPP 5g standard.
The alternative AST opted out of has parts, or all, of the base-station placed onboard the satellite, whereas ASTs is on earth.
2/n
Starlink DTH is an add-on functionality to an existing architecture built for another purpose. It uses the other architecture.
This has several implications.
For handoff and multi connectivity.
But importantly ..
3/n
Having the eNodeB or base-station on the ground like AST does allows access to it and it allows use of COTS cutting edge hardware like Nokia single-RAN Airscale.
AST has been working with Nokia Bell Labs for two years to integrate assuring best possible technology. 4/n
Satellite communications payload is another choice where AST stands out. It is typical GEO (high altitude) satellite specs, but placed in LEO (low altitude).
A bit like putting an ocean-liner in a pond it might seem.
5/n
That allows for more narrow beams using less power, yet creating high sihnal strengths.
The win is three fold. Good mapping/resolution. High spectrum reuse and high modulation.
Resulting in good coverage and high throughput.
6/n
Low Earth Orbit has these benefits. Low RTT latency is one. Essential to work with 5g.
But also problems. Latency is still higher than terrestrial towers. Doppler shift needs to be handled and Farraday rotation of the polarization.
AST BlueBird servicelinks are 20 degrees above horizon.
8/n
That is another extreme design choice made possible by the huge 20 meter square array. As you need all of it to make a so narrow and strong beam.
The BlueWalker3 test satellite will generate such smsll cells 30-35 degrees above horizon as its phased array is smaller.
9/n
$AST uses fixed cell sites and steerable beams. Beams that are made more narrow and elliptical near the edge of the satellite firld of view in order to cast circular beamcells of uniform size onto the surface of the earth. It does not use moving cells.
10/n
The backhaul, or feeder link, field of view is even wider. It works down to 10 degrees above horizon as its antenna is a steerable 70 cm dish connecting to huge steerable dishes at the gateways.
11/n
There is much more, to tell, about the design choices made.
One is that the satellite is FPGA, or software defined. It means they can patch and tweak a lot during in orbit tests.
I will just summarize, for now, that the choices made are very wise as you scrutinize them.
12/12
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I’d like to focus not on how these rapid-fire beam to beam handovers causes dropped texts. Not on how that type of beams cause more border interference. Etc.
But on battery.
Starlink 🪫 d2c does not like
AST 🔋SpaceMobile fix the beam onto you with adaptive beamforming.
2/
Starlink 🪫 d2c does just shines their beams down in a static fixed manner and as the satellites traverse the sky you are in a whole set of beams that hand over to eachother,
The way you can differentiate emmissions in space [where] and in time [when] and in strength [how much] you can also differentiate in the frequenzy domain [which channel].
The transmissions are ”good signals” if they’re [when], [where], [as strong] and [which channel] combo that is needed to do the transmission that is sought for.
Another combo is ”a waste”.
But some other combos also do harm.
”Bad signal”
2/n
This is a result showing AST SpaceMobile technology to maximize the signal to which channel it is wanted in (blue) ”good signal” while minimizing it elsewhere, which is adjacent channels. (Green). ”Bad signal”
This image shows the Chinese bomber fleet range. Previous and that of H-20 bomber project a bomber similar to the US flying wing stealth bombers.
As can be seen Hawaii is now within range.
1/n
A bit smaller regional nuclear capable strike aircraft like this one shown yesterday (JH-XX ?) are likely capable of reaching places like Guam and Japan.
The two types of aircraft are built for stealth, low observability. And likely capable of electronic warfare.
2/n
Australia ponders buting the B21 as a strategic deterrent.
It is the most modern US stealth bomber and is capable of reaching chinese airforce bases.
The opposite would be true of the chinese equivallent.