C🅰️tSE Profile picture
Dec 25, 2022 12 tweets 6 min read Read on X
$ASTS satellite #BlueWalker3 in orbit testing is ongoing.

It is the cutting edge of 5g Non-Terrestrial-Network NTN, Direct-To-Handset, DTH, technology.

It has a lot of interesting design choices.

Selected, in tech, standard and regulatory terms as it was purpose built.

1/n
Previous schematic of the transparent satellite AST uses is one of two NTN DTH architectures supported by the global 3GPP 5g standard.

The alternative AST opted out of has parts, or all, of the base-station placed onboard the satellite, whereas ASTs is on earth.

2/n
Starlink DTH is an add-on functionality to an existing architecture built for another purpose. It uses the other architecture.

This has several implications.

For handoff and multi connectivity.

But importantly ..

3/n
Having the eNodeB or base-station on the ground like AST does allows access to it and it allows use of COTS cutting edge hardware like Nokia single-RAN Airscale.

AST has been working with Nokia Bell Labs for two years to integrate assuring best possible technology.
4/n
Satellite communications payload is another choice where AST stands out. It is typical GEO (high altitude) satellite specs, but placed in LEO (low altitude).

A bit like putting an ocean-liner in a pond it might seem.

5/n
That allows for more narrow beams using less power, yet creating high sihnal strengths.

The win is three fold. Good mapping/resolution. High spectrum reuse and high modulation.

Resulting in good coverage and high throughput.

6/n
Low Earth Orbit has these benefits. Low RTT latency is one. Essential to work with 5g.

But also problems. Latency is still higher than terrestrial towers. Doppler shift needs to be handled and Farraday rotation of the polarization.

These have tweaks that can be tuned.

7/n
But tuning takes time.

I will quote @steve_larrison here.

”Testing is a process, not an event.”

Initial results < final results.

But there is more to architecture.

AST BlueBird servicelinks are 20 degrees above horizon.

8/n
That is another extreme design choice made possible by the huge 20 meter square array. As you need all of it to make a so narrow and strong beam.

The BlueWalker3 test satellite will generate such smsll cells 30-35 degrees above horizon as its phased array is smaller.

9/n
$AST uses fixed cell sites and steerable beams. Beams that are made more narrow and elliptical near the edge of the satellite firld of view in order to cast circular beamcells of uniform size onto the surface of the earth. It does not use moving cells.

10/n
The backhaul, or feeder link, field of view is even wider. It works down to 10 degrees above horizon as its antenna is a steerable 70 cm dish connecting to huge steerable dishes at the gateways.

11/n
There is much more, to tell, about the design choices made.

One is that the satellite is FPGA, or software defined. It means they can patch and tweak a lot during in orbit tests.

I will just summarize, for now, that the choices made are very wise as you scrutinize them.
12/12

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with C🅰️tSE

C🅰️tSE Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CatSE___ApeX___

Sep 24
BlueBirds have all flipped to radar cross section large.

They also exhibit this type of increase
in drag.

I conclude that detumbling was succesful and that the payload now consistently displays a large radar reflecting cross section towards earth.

Likely still inside the LVAs.
Image
Image
BlueWalker 3 exhibited the same signature change of increased drag coefficient and a RCS flip 2022-10-06

~ Launch + 26 days.

The 5 BB1s are all there Launch +10 days.

Practice makes perfect.

2/n Image
The 5 birds all keep communicating in the ~450MHz range on TT&C channels.

Nothing noteworthy there, just doing what BW3 did.



3/3 network.satnogs.org/observations/?…
Image
Read 9 tweets
Sep 21
Applications in all four phases.

Observe - sensor input
Orient - coms
Decide - more coms
Act - electronic warfare

Communications use cases but also non communications use cases.

The specs of a set of formation flying BB1 FPGAs makes them FF-SAR FoPen AKA FOLPEN capable.

1/n
Things has molecules in them. They react to electromahnetic fields differently.

And you can add resolution/ signature by formation flying, by dual polarization and by large bandwidth.

AST does all of that. ✅✅✅👀

2/n
Image
Image
Hypothetically such arrays can collect very high res data of the world under their area of coverage. Intermittently and report by means of AI any changes.

Any new soldier, vehicle or mine down to 0.5 metee depth.

This would evaporate much of the fog of war.

3/n
Read 8 tweets
Sep 15
Constellation level aggregated out of band emmission interference is a showstopper for Starlink.

This is due to crazy big leakage in adjacent bands/channels.

So when constellation increase from 300 to 4500 (15x) they need to cut radiated power down to 15%
The system can’t scale Image
There is a term for such a system:

Non-scalable architecture. In technical contexts, this is often referred to as negative scaling or diminishing returns.

2/n
Image
Image
Two. 2.

Major changes to the SCS R&O killed starlink d2c

One is that the proposition of co-primary licenses was changed to SCS being on secondary basis.

Other primary users (read terrestrial MNOs) enjoy total protection.

Starlink can use PCS on a _non_interference basis.

3/ Image
Read 8 tweets
Sep 14
Here are some Carrier to noise specifications of AST SpaceMobile.

In a filing today to the FCC Starlink reveals more of their d2c system.

Click link twice.

1/n licensing.fcc.gov/myibfs/downloa…



Image
Image
Image
Space-x Starlink d2c will drop from being able to do 5dB SINR (voice) to 0dB (texts)

If they were to comply with FCC rules.

We can now compare this to $ASTS.

2/n

Image
Image
Image
Interesting that Starlink squeak about first responders this and that (hint they’re on First Net so will not use this SCS at all).

They do not like AST simply reply with all their specs.

Like so:

22dB Carrier signal to interference and noise. When in compliance with FCC rules.
Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Sep 14
Scotia analysts apparenly read some of the DD shared by the SpaceMob community.

If You want Alpha or ”edge” investing in the nascent SCS market, so should You.

Previously thought by many to be the more technically advanced satcom operator Starlink is not getting approval.

1/n
🐾 ACLR. Adjacent Channel Leakage Ratio.

Recent requests by Starlink and some math (I was more kind to them than RKF engineering)

Is for Starlink ~-24.6 dBW/m2/MHz
And for AST ~-45 dBW/m2/MHz

This relates to quality of RF equipment.

A 20dB delta.

2/
It’s important to understand how AST beats Starlink by a lot in multiple different dimensions.

ACLR is focus in the frequenzy domain. How good a system is at not spamming adjacent _channels_.

And the 20dB difference is log scale.

AST is 100 times better.

3/
Read 25 tweets
Sep 2
A few aspects of a NTN system design affects the area spectral efficiency of the system.

I have touched on them and how they relate to Shannons law.

High directivity that creates narrow beams and small cells is key.
See my pinned tweet.

Then there is also interference.🧶🐈‍⬛ Image
We can think of this as the area spectral efficiency aSE as the main metric by which MNOs will choose which Satellite Network Operator Mobile to work with.

And interference is the metric by which regulators select which SNO-Ms are allowed to operate at all.

Gain affects both
/2 Image
Lets consider this image.

It shows the wide beam of smaller arrays (from 2 antennas wide) and the narrow beam of a medium sized array (up to 64 antennas wide)

Creating a beam cell we use the central strongest part of the beam marked in red and blue.

Narrow is good for aSE

/3
Image
Image
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(