In 1965, a disgruntled Ku Klux Klan leader gave the FBI the names of most of the Exalted Cyclopses (ECs) in Louisiana. According to the list, the Exalted Cyclops in St. Francisville was one "Ray Drear (ph)" [phonetic].
I shouldn’t have to tell you that the FBI and informants lie constantly. But we know for sure that John Rarick (a notoriously racist congressman with documented KKK ties) had a lifelong political association with Murphy Dreher Jr, brother of Ray Oliver Dreher Sr.
The Dreher brothers (Murphy and Ray) along with Rarick were all leaders in the small St. Francisville Masonic lodge, which had about 100 members). Ray's son later said, "If there was something about West Feliciana that Ray Dreher did not know, it was probably not worth knowing.”
According to a historian of the so-called "Second Klan" in the '20s, the KKK "deliberately sought to recruit Freemasons into their order, and succeeded in doing so." The presence of the Second Klan in St. Francisville is attested. It would be shocking if all traces vanished.
Consider the timeline: Houston Morris told the FBI he organized the St. Francisville KKK unit in October 1963, when he inducted Rarick and “five more men at St Francisville“ into the KKK.
Between 1963 and 1964 - exactly when Morris claims to have inducted Rarick and unnamed others into the KKK - Ray Dreher became top officer ("worshipful master") in the St. Francisville Masons. By 1965, according to Morris, "Ray Drear [ph]" was Exalted Cyclops of the local Klan.
If you're wondering by now how Ray Oliver Dreher Jr (the man we all know as Rod Dreher) pronounces his last name, there's a million YouTube videos waiting.
This wouldn't matter at all except that Rod is extremely racist - so much that other conservatives (even one whose book has "Benedict Option" in the name) had to distance themselves during the Floyd protests. Rod's premise is a false innocence in which racism is long past.
In a rare lucid moment, Rod once reported that researchers have “documented at least 10 lynchings in W. Feliciana Parish." He claimed to "want to know who was killed....We all need to know these things and face down what our ancestors did...These were our fathers, grandfathers."
Even in that post - one of the best of a sad oeuvre - Rod put this all safely before his own time ("if you were a black in the years 1877-1950," he feels your pain). But Rarick took national office a month before Rod was born - Rod is fully contemporary w/ Rarick's Louisiana.
If you think the evidence re: his dad is circumstantial, there can be no debate that Rod's beloved uncle Murph was a lifelong comrade of Rarick, a guy who chilled with the man who murdered Medgar Evers. Someone should ask about it in Rod's next New Yorker profile!
(I found these documents just by searching for "Rarick" and "St. Francisville" in LSU's database of records related to civil rights-era cold cases. Here's the crucial "Drear" file: lsucoldcaseproject.com/wp-content/upl…)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
People have compared this, rightly, to MLK, but it reminds me of Debs' speech in the dock:
"Your honor, years ago I recognized my kinship with all living beings, and I made up my mind that I was not one bit better than the meanest on earth."
"I said then, and I say now, that while there is a lower class, I am in it, and while there is a criminal element I am of it, and while there is a soul inprison, I am not free."
"When the mariner, sailing over tropic seas, looks for relief from his weary watch, he turns his eyes toward the southern cross, burning luridly above the tempest-vexed ocean. As the midnight approaches, the southern cross begins to bend, the whirling worlds change places..."
Mike comes down on the dovish side here. One question I haven't seen answered by the hawks : say you're right that nominal wage growth is now fundamentally incompatible with price stability. will it *ever* be possible for wages to grow fast enough to increase the wage share?
Leaving aside the current reality, in the abstract you could make a convincing case that wage growth is inflationary. But from the point of view of wage earners, you'd just be saying that the entire system of distributing income through wages is a distributional trap.
Great writeup of Yellen's worker insecurity memo by @schwarz: "The Treasury Department did not respond immediately to a request for comment from Yellen." theintercept.com/2023/01/24/une…
The Intercept piece gives a much fuller sense than my short post did of both the mid-1990s policy moment and the intellectual context of NAIRU etc.
The piece also gets at the crucial subtlety here - "Yellen is not a monster" and, perversely, the startling anti-worker reasoning in the memo was meant to shore up the then-laughable idea that unemployment could fall much below 6%.
I had a strange dream about an essay attacking service sector unionism. The tagline was "The New Labor Culturalist wants to celebrate and support labor—just not all of it," but by some weird quirk of dream logic the article was illustrated with a picture of a sexy nurse.
It's a good thing this was just a dream because otherwise people would have probably wasted time thinking about it, but it did occur to me it might be worth addressing one point that people are apparently confused over.
Is it fatalistic to accept the dominance service employment as a share of total employment as a fact from which organizing and strategy must begin? Does this not overlook the possibility that the composition of employment is a political choice?