Looking at the difference between the "Apollonian" Classical world and the "Faustian" later Western culture, a major difference is performance and artifice
Look at the Jungian concept of "persona" which is like a mask -- this would've been incomprehensible to Hellenes
To scions of the Faustian West, the persona is so important that the person to whom it belongs becomes confused whether they are the persona or the character underneath
With the Hellenes a subject and his expression were unified, such a confusion of identity unheard of
This is probably yet another case where Spengler was right to describe the Hellenic civilization as "everything simple" but I don't take it in the negative way he meant it
Or again, Nietzsche said that to the Greeks "only appearances mattered" -- apparent character IS character
So we have a situation where character and expression got a good deal more complicated and even deceptive over time
The Faustian is a performative type, much more inclined to put on airs, and to do so often enough that even he becomes confused about the truth of it
To the Hellenes, if there were a performance, it was always made explicit, and it was done in an exception to the everyday life
Their theater tragedies and dramas and comedies were like this -- the masks and personas adopted there purposefully set apart from ordinary life
It's strange but it also explains some of the problems we Westerners face and also some of the gap in comprehension that we face in trying to understand previous civilizations
I have speculated that at some future age, America may be home to yet another high culture....
And I think judging from the first hints of it, as it's still in its dreaming phase before awakening, show a spirit closer to the Hellenic -- more public, more of a cult of the local, less artifice in distinction between men (when expressed in its purest form that is)
But of course, as I've also said, America of today is also in many ways uber-Faustian, in that it was the place that the Faustian spirit was able to completely stretch out without preexisting impedimenta ... our wilderness rolled out the red carpet for its civilized phase ...
But "civilization is a whim of circumstance" and "barbarism triumphs in the end" said Robert E. Howard in Beyond the Black River and I doubt but little that the true spirit of America will again reveal itself once the Faustian tide goes back out to sea a bit in centuries to come
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A realistic take on the USA economy that won't make it into the fake news:
We have at least two megalith-tier rackets/scams eating up much of the product of the nation
1/ helfcare is a parasitic oligopoly that eats >1/5 of the national product whilst doing more harm than good
This amounts to multiples of the ridiculously bloated Department of Defense budget that gets so much attention (well deserved I might add)
And 2/ an overleveraged real estate ponzi from coast to coast
Much of the insurance and finance sectors are tributaries of these
Putting both of the two together we see that it has hollowed out the economy such that business (and in some places, like the blue metropolises, life itself) is no longer viable in many places
Much of the nominally productive activity goes to support these gargantuan rackets too
Public space in our time has been corrupted along 2 sinister or alienating lines
1/ Dense developments for living without commons for the use of inhabitants
But also
2/ Public space made total, digital Stasi society blurring the distinction between public and private life
The dense urban or suburban developments today, you will be lucky to see parks zoned into them, and certainly not things like plazas/squares/markets, at least not in US
The closest we came to commons in urban/sub. was in the shopping mall, long past its heyday anyway - sad !
This is deeply alienating, and if once upon a time I thought it was maybe bad design, I start to suspect sadism now on behalf of the planners
I guess the US never did public space as well as some parts of the world, but via American influence this type of development has spread
Since I was talking about philology recently, in regard to poor translation of key concepts from German philosophy,
I also realized that there's a similar big problem with words in same lang. changing meaning over time, sometimes innocently and sometimes deliberately obfuscated
The problem is it renders the past incomprehensible if this goes on for long enough, and we all know that there are people who want this
A specific word in English for which this applies is 'race'. It used to mean a lineage, or a group of people sharing a lineage
However, it came to mean (I don't know exactly when but I would guess 18-19th cent.) type instead
This led, among other things, to grave oversimplification of the phenomenon itself
Groups of only remote connexion then became "related" due to sharing certain features of type