A Communist in Hong Kong Profile picture
Dec 26, 2022 30 tweets 9 min read Read on X
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency continues to insist that the ‘overwhelming majority’ of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to the COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ it has authorised are ‘sore arms, headache, tiredness and feeling sick’. But is this borne out by the reports? Image
After 3 years of failing to differentiate between serious and non-serious reactions during the ‘pandemic’, this month the MHRA finally published the figures that identify this for all COVID-19 ‘vaccines’, and they contradict their own assertions.
gov.uk/government/pub…
Of the 177,925 Yellow Card reports of 511,775 adverse drug reactions received after being injected with the Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA ‘vaccine’, 71% (125,711) were categorised by the MHRA as ‘serious’. Image
The ADRs included 2,640 immune system disorders, 7,950 vascular disorders; 14,380 cardiac disorders; 17,670 blood disorders; 23,070 respiratory disorders; 31,790 reproductive and breast disorders; 58,340 musculoskelatal and tissue disorders; and 84,730 nervous system disorders. Image
And far from being the normal, expected, and coincidental illnesses of an ageing demographic who just happened to be injected before suffering these symptoms, the serious reactions were mostly in the young and healthy, with 54% under the age of 50. Image
Of the 246,866 Yellow Card reports of 874,912 adverse drug reactions after being injected with the AstraZeneca/Oxford viral-vector ‘vaccine’, 77% (190,997) were categorised by the MHRA as ‘serious’. Image
The ADRs included 3,481 immune system disorders; 14,078 vascular disorders; 11,599 cardiac disorders; 7,922 blood disorders; 23,070 respiratory disorders; 20,983 reproductive and breast disorders; 105,331 musculoskelatal and tissue disorders; and 183,978 nervous system disorders. Image
And once again, rather than being reports from the ageing and infirm who coincidentally were injected with the AstraZeneca viral vector ‘vaccine’, 48% of the reports of serious adverse reactions were from people under the age of 50. Image
Of the 47,045 Yellow Card reports of 151,628 adverse drug reactions received after being injected with the Moderna/NIH mRNA ‘vaccine’, 72% (33,896) were categorised by the MHRA as ‘serious’. Image
The ADRs included 738 immune system disorders; 1,641 vascular disorders; 2,862 blood disorders; 5,438 reproductive and breast disorders; 14,152 cardiac disorders; 17,071 musculoskelatal and tissue disorders; 23,070 respiratory disorders; and 24,861 nervous system disorders. Image
And once again but even more so, 65% of the serious adverse reactions to the Moderna messenger RNA injections were reported by people under the age of 50. Image
Including the 446 serious adverse drug reactions to the Novavax injections or from an unspecified brand of COVID-19 ‘vaccine’, that adds up to 351,050 reports of adverse drug reactions to the MHRA approved injections categorised by the MHRA as ‘serious’.
However, since the MHRA, by its own admission, estimates that only 10% of serious ADRS are reported, the COVID-19 injections have caused over 3.5 million serious adverse reactions in the UK, leading to permanent injury, ruined health, amputation and death. gov.uk/drug-safety-up…
Not for the first time, then, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency responsible for the safety of the experimental COVID-19 injections is lying to the UK public not only about the risks and dangers of being injected but about the seriousness of the consequences. Image
In addition, the MHRA says that Bell’s Palsy, which causes weakness or paralysis of the muscles on one side of the face, following injection with a COVID-19 vaccine is ‘rare’, which in medical terms means there’s a 1 in 1,000 to 1 in 10,000 chance of it occuring.
As of October 2022, the MHRA has received 179 reports of transverse myelitis, a neurological disorder where parts of the spinal cord are inflamed: 129 after the AstraZeneca injection, 42 after Pfizer, and 8 after Moderna. They call this ‘extremely rare’ (less than 1 in 100,000).
As of 23 November 2022, the MHRA had received 445 reports of thrombo-embolic (blood clotting) with concurrent low platelets, of which 81 resulted in death, after injection with the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’. 44% of these events were in people under the age of 50. Image
As of 23 November 2022, the MHRA has received 40,327 reports of 51,695 menstrual disorders and/or unexpected vaginal bleeding after injection with a COVID-19 ‘vaccine’. However, the MHRA insists there is ‘no link’ to the injections.
As of 23 November 2022, the MHRA has received 2,226 reports of myocarditis or pericarditis (inflammation of the heart) after injection with COVID-19 ‘vaccines’: 1,361 after the Pfizer injection; 363 after the Moderna injections; and 472 after the AstraZeneca injections. Image
When injected with the mRNA biotechnology used in the Pfizer and Moderna ‘vaccines’, myocarditis and pericarditis results mostly in the young, with 54% of heart inflammations occuring in those aged between 18 and 39. The MHRA calls these ‘very rare' (less than 1 in 10,000).
As of 23 November 2022, the MHRA has received 697 reports of Guillain-Barré Syndrome and the related Miller Fisher Syndrome, causing inflammation of the nerves and can lead to numbness, weakness and pain, usually in the feet, hands and limbs and can spread to the chest and face.
Finally, the most serious adverse reaction to the the COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ is death, of which the MHRA has received 2,362 reports: 857 after the Pfizer injection; 1,334 after the AstraZeneca injection; 111 after the Moderna injection; and 60 after an unspecified brand. Image
Correction: 65% (not 54%) of the percentage of serious adverse reactions following injection with the Pfizer ‘vaccine’ were reported by people under the age of 50, the same percentage as Moderna, both using the mRNA platform to inject the COVID-19 spike protein into the body.
The Exposé is publishing my written accounts of six of the victims of the AstraZeneca injection one by one, as they write, ‘so each of the victims’ voices can be heard and given the attention they deserve’. Here’s the first, Dr. Stephen Wright.
expose-news.com/2022/12/24/vic…
Here’s the second, David Mears, who is only one of the more than 190,000 Britons who have reported serious adverse reactions to the viral vector AstraZeneca injections out of an estimated 1.9 million.
expose-news.com/2022/12/27/vic…
And here’s the third, Paul Bainbridge, who even when lying in hospital paralysed by the injection continued to mock ‘anti-vaxxers’, demonstrating just how much the COVID-faithful have invested in their dogma, and how much it will take to turn them.
expose-news.com/2022/12/28/vic…
Here’s the fourth victim, Alex Mitchell, who after having his leg amputated as a result of the AstraZeneca ‘vaccine’, was reported by the media (falsely, it later turns out) as saying he hoped it wouldn’t put others off being injected.
expose-news.com/2022/12/29/vic…
This article by Iain Davis published by UK Column tells a very different story from that reported in the mainstream media, which cynically used Mr. Mitchell’s mutilation to promote the experimental and dangerous UK ‘vaccination’ programme to the UK public.
ukcolumn.org/article/alex-m…
Here’s the fifth victim, Tanya Smith, whose death following injection with the AstraZeneca viral-vector gene therapy demonstrates the huge imbalance between the tiny risk of COVID-19 to a 43-year-old woman and the huge risk of the experimental injections.
expose-news.com/2022/12/30/vic…
The sixth and last victim whose story I recorded. Lisa Shaw was famous, and so an autopsy was performed on her, contrary to Section 19 of the Coronavirus Act 2022, which empowers a doctor to attribute a death to COVID-19 without having seen the body.
expose-news.com/2022/12/31/vic…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with A Communist in Hong Kong

A Communist in Hong Kong Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SimonElmer2022

Jun 7
To counter the influence of the Muslim Council of Britain and other Islamists in UK politics and civil society, we need an English Council of Great Britain that will represent the English people, because our government, parliament, municipal authorities and councils do not. Image
The purpose and task of this council would include the following:
1. To protect English children on their journey to, from and at schools from bullying and physical abuse by immigrants, and holding teachers, schools and councils accountable for failing to do so themselves.
2. To protect English women and girls from sexual harassment and rape in town centres, municipal parks and other preying grounds of immigrants, particularly after dark, and holding councils and police forces accountable for failing to do so themselves.
Read 37 tweets
Jun 6
The resignation of Zia Yusuf as Chairman of Reform UK over calls to ban the burqa demonstrates, once again, that no matter how many Union Jacks they wrap themselves in, Muslims will always put the dictates of their medieval prophet over the United Kingdom. Image
By changing Reform UK’s policy from remigration to ‘essential’ immigration, and in the process ejecting Rupert Lowe, Reform’s spokesman for remigration, from the party, Yusuf’s job is done. No party with Muslim members will ever halt mass immigration.
architectsforsocialhousing.co.uk/2024/12/02/the…
Muslims are not here to integrate, they are here to carry out the commands of their holy book: to conquer infidels. Their purpose in joining the UK’s political parties is not to further their policies, but to change their policies to the dictates of Islam.
Read 6 tweets
May 31
Why should followers of an ideology hostile to the UK, our history, culture, people, laws and values, be represented in our parliament and councils? Muslims have their own countries, all of them dictatorships. They have no right to govern ours.
1. MP for Blackburn, Adnan Hussain Image
2. MP for Bradford West, Naz Shah Image
3. MP for Birmingham Hall Green and Moseley, Tahir Ali Image
Read 57 tweets
May 30
The ONS has revised its calculation of immigration to the UK, and contrary to reports it’s worse than we thought. In the decade between 2015 and 2024, 9.081 million long-term immigrants have entered the UK legally. That’s in addition to the 150,000 illegal immigrants since 2018. Image
Of these 9,081,000 immigrants, 5,317,000 came from outside the European Union. 3,887,000 of these non-EU immigrants came since Brexit came into force in 2020, that is, in just the last 5 years. None came from countries that are at war. None of them are refugees. Image
Net migration into the UK (the number of immigrants minus emmigrants) between 2015 and 2024 was 3,961,000. However, 3,747,000 of these were from outside the EU. Over the same decade, 506,000 British citizens have left the UK. These are the figures of replacement immigration. Image
Read 6 tweets
May 24
The Islamisation of the UK is a far-Right, white-supremacist, racist, Islamophobic conspiracy theory. If you think this is normal, or that any other country in the world that is not a colony would tolerate this, I have some vaccines to sell you.
1. MP for Blackburn, Adnan Hussain Image
2. MP for Bradford West, Naz Shah Image
3. MP for Birmingham Hall Green and Moseley, Tahir Ali Image
Read 57 tweets
May 14
In the year to June 2024, 1,034,000 long-term immigrants from outside the EU entered the UK. Only 1 in 10 of them may be working for their sponsor, but it’s the UK state (i.e. British taxpayers) who are paying for the rent, medical care, education and benefits of the other 9. Image
As of September 2024, of the previous 3.6 million work visas granted to the UK, only 12% went to high-skilled workers (i.e. earning 30% more than the average UK salary of £33,000 in 2024) and whose presence here, therefore, benefits the UK economy. Image
The image of immigrant doctors, scientists and engineers coming here to save our failing public services is a deliberately inaccurate picture of immigration to the UK. Scientists and engineers made up only 0.6% of those visas, doctors only 0.8%. Image
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(