People feel in their gut there's a link between gender ideology and paedophilia. Not hard to imagine, if you've ever met a pervert. But what's the link? Forever-children *seem* like a paedo dream. But how is a gamer-sissy-forced-fem-catgirl connected to, say, UN SOGI weirdos? 1/
If you spend time on paedo forums, this is clear: the first wave of paedophile activists think the movement is dead. They're trying to revive it via a proper movement. They's old school bloggers, archivists, getting old, and they don't know much about things like 2/
... Discord. "Paedophile rights" has evolved without them. Their leaders are in jail in South America. They remember the glory days of being members of @ILGAWORLD and they are still stung by the betrayal of getting kicked out of respectable NGOs. 3/
Old-school paedos don't really understand the new internet. New gen paedos are stalking all the places where young people work out their identities (r/egg_irl, sissification discord etc) but they have both realised they have a shared goal with trans rights activists 4/
The shared goal is, of course: rights of the child, which incorporates right to autonomy, right to privacy, and right to consent. Here is Florence Ashley, who wrote the model law on banning transgender "conversion therapy" (his book was blurbed by @victor_madrigal) 5/
.. arguing that kids can consent to puberty blockers. The model law that Ashley (real name Paré) wrote is promo'd by the UN. It *may* be the basis of the conversion therapy bills introduced out of nowhere in EU countries in the past year 6/ 
The shared interest of the retro paedos and the TRAs is explained neatly here on the blog of paedophile activist Tom O'Carroll:
Euro-perverts of ye-olde Martijn and PNVD fame are regrouping, and they want to start a new movement. And they know that @ProstasiaInc and @qirtaiba are doing a great job in de-demonising "MAPs" (Jeremy Malcolm is contributing to legislative consultations all over the world) 8/
Both the first wave and second wave paedo communities know that children's "bodily autonomy" (incl sexual agency) are the vehicles they need to hitch their movements to. Of course, the academics are right behind them supplying the "intellectual" ammo 9/ scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&…
So without getting all Qanon about things: we know that they change the meanings of words and terms mid-play, so watch out for any innocuous-sounding rights of the child legislation. We need to make sure it's not a trap. @RutgersNL is one to watch on this. End/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
