What makes Dreher unusual, if not unique, on the right is he is so sincere. He has a wild backstory that often overshadows whatever he's arguing on a given day. Yet - here's the Dreher difference - he isn't playing that up to patch up right-wing talking points. 1/
The thing that is so maddening about him is that he is so sincere & earnest & yet, by my lefty lights, he suffers from - I won't call it severe false-consciousness because I don't want to get all theory about it. He fails to make basic connections, see evident parallels. 2/
theamericanconservative.com/a-darkness-rev… His latest reflection, in the wake of the sad revelation about his dad, is a case in point. He thinks left-wingers want to force him to hate his dad. I dunno, man. I'm sure there are jerks. But why not just: so extend basic respect to LGBTQ folks? 3/
'I was weird and wasn't accepted for my differences, even though it should have been fine. A stiff conservatism that wasn't Christian, just authoritarian and intolerant, made life needlessly miserable for me.' The lesson in that shouldn't be: let's freak out about drag queens. 4/
Overall, it's a tale about respect, inclusion & the need for that in life. Life is mysterious, so being respectful means allowing for that - and for being messed up. So how can you NOT, then, ask: what if the other side is kind of like you? 5/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The first thing you believe when you take the blue pill is that you took the red pill. That's what the blue pill is for, and that's why Taibbi is gobbling them down by the fistful.
But one more, possibly less obvious way to put the point ...
From "Democracy For Realists", by Achens and Bartels.
The Russell Jacoby piece Dawkins and Musk are responding to is ... dismayingly half-baked. 1/ tabletmag.com/sections/arts-…
I'm sympathetic to Jacoby's old line: a lot of 'theory' silliness got spread about in the humanities in the 80's-90's. There were perverse incentives - professional rewards - for doing 'philosophy' badly in various ways. This was not good. I'm happy to badmouth bad stuff. 2/
But honestly, as Jacoby himself used to acknowledge, it wasn't threat-to-the-republic-grade. Anyone who pretends 'ivory tower-types being eccentric' = 'barbarians at the gates of western civ' is one more funny, bug-in-his-ear character in some David Lodge novel. 3/
A severe oversimplification - with a kernel of truth in it. (I hope we've all read our Nietzsche.) No tweet rebuttal can avoid counter-simplification but I would ask instead: how and why did the US civil rights struggle, and the heroic figure of MLK, achieve paradigm status?
Partly, MLK is an appealing, Christ-like martyr, sure. (If the other 'side' has one of those, you have to invent your own.) But the reason why the civil rights struggle 'worked', in US politics and culture and law, goes way beyond that. It's peculiarly American - but also global.
The write-up omits the most notable case of Kelly not being one to duck a fight. He only became a cartoonist because he was fired from Disney, as an animator, because he was one of the original strikers. awn.com/animationworld…
He did a lot of cartooning in the 40's before "Pogo" took off. One thing notable about it is how much poorer it is than "Pogo" would be. Quite a bit of mediocre Christmas stuff! But always the cartooning is lovely. He really excels at drawing cute little kids & dogs.
So I made a poster. (If you like that sort of thing.) In general, I decided to have another go round with my philosopher designs, now in brighter, pop art-y colors. You want Kant wallpaper? I got it! Sticker sets, too! redbubble.com/people/jholbo/…
Thicker lines! I consulted old Fillmore East concert posters for color combos! (Maybe the whimsically dreary colors I picked before were a drag on the market? People are weird, you never know.)
But here's the thing. This all started about a year and a half ago when I resolved to draw 100 philosophers. (I'm up to about 70, I think.) I thought: I'll sell 'em! So I checked out the competition and immediately picked my lofty target.
Aaand two things are now going on: 1) David French advocates Millian liberalism for Twitter; 2) David French is now trending on the right, due to being dog-piled as a pedophile, due to liking a tweet in which someone said they didn't like Musk scapegoating Roth as a groomer. /1
If you dislike what Twitter's ancien regime was like, David French should be your guy. There is, so far as I can see, no coherent objection to the old moderation system, qua system, besides some attempt at Millian 'viewpoint neutrality'. /3