#Receptiogate 1. Registering a company at a correspondence address is utterly normal commercial practice (although expressly describing it as a physical office is not). 2. Using stock photos to represent employees seems to be common, even by otherwise legitimate companies. 1/
3. Plagiarizing text & photos from a blog or other online sources without acknowledgement is dishonest and appalling scholarly practice, but generally not criminal.
4. Obtaining grant money for what turns out to be shoddy or academically flawed work is not per se criminal. 2/
The relevant authorities - and the mainstream media - are now aware of the matter. Criminal justice - if that's what Rossi should face - should be pursued soberly & carefully by the police & the Swiss courts, not by a gleeful online mob who are seeing it all as entertainment. 3/
Of course Receptio is shady, of course it should have been exposed, of course Peter was right to blog about it. I've said all this repeatedly. But NOW, 5 days later, much of the #Receptiogate discourse on Twitter is just gleeful schadenfreude and popcorn memes. It's enough. 4/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I haven't tweeted about #Receptiogate since the 27th because I think this has now morphed from - quite correctly - calling out plagiarism, to gleeful internet bloodsport. Rossi (& later her husband too) have lied & behaved appallingly, both initially and since the story broke. 1/
Peter Kidd was absolutely right to call this out, and his subsequent blogposts accurately summarize the situation.
But on Twitter there's now a gleeful quality to the whole affair that doesn't sit right with me: people are laughing at the destruction of someone's livelihood . 2/
Rossi and her husband seem now to me, more than anything else, bewildered and frightened. Rossi's behavior has been grossly unprofessional, unscholarly, rude and dishonest, but has it been criminal? I don't think I've seen evidence of that. 3/
There are some interesting cultural differences playing out in L'Affaire Receptio which are perhaps worth thinking about: the differences between the commercial vs the academic world, and Anglo-American vs Italian norms of professional communication. 1/7
Receptio is now being judged (as in my opinion, it should be) by academic standards, but it seems to have been run very much by commercial standards. So for example, the verbatim copying of Peter Kidd's Sotheby's description (if that's what happened) without acknowledgement.. 2/7
....is, in academic terms, outright plagiarism, which is regarded as a cardinal, career-ending sin, and so has been understandably condemned. Things are very different in the commercial world: booksellers, even very high-end ones, quite routinely lightly paraphrase.... 3/7
A point of clarification:
Company registration at a registered office/correspondence address like this is completely normal, and very widely used in the commercial world. There are many entirely valid reasons for doing this, including: 1/6
a. For small or one-man businesses, it keeps your home address off the internet, which many business owners quite understandably prefer for reasons of security or privacy. I've used services like this in the past myself, for precisely this reason. 2/6
b. If, as a small businessman, you wish for legal or tax reasons to register a company in a country where you don't yourself live, using this type of company formation firm with a registered office address is often the only practical way to do it without huge expense. 3/6
Lithuanian linguistic territory in the Polish state between 1927–1933. This rare 1930s wall map of the territory around Grodno and Vilnius, depicting the areas where inhabitants spoke Lithuanian, Slavic [Belarusian], Yiddish and German has not previously been shared online. 1/
Olgierd Chomiński (1884-1943) was a linguist at Vilnius University. Between 1928 and 1933 he surveyed what was then a Polish border region, but is today a part of Lithuania and Belarus, from East of Grodno, with Vilnius in the middle, to the Daugava River in the North-West. 2/
Chomiński's map marked the areas where people spoke Lithuanian (red), Belarusian (green), German (black) and Yiddish (blue). The Lithuanian & Belarusian languages dominate, with Yiddish as well in larger centers and the German language mostly limited to the area near Prussia. 3/
If there was any doubt that Genazym were now the most commercially remarkable rare book auction house on earth, the results of their latest Judaica auction this week put paid to that: essentially almost every lot sold for *at least* twice estimate.... 1/ genazym.com/auction/615-wi…
...with many selling for 3, 4, 5, or 10 times estimate - and these estimates were in themselves generally optimistic by historical standards. If you're looking to consign premium Judaica to auction, it's now honestly hard to see why you'd even consider anyone else. 2/
Genazym has tapped into a seemingly vast pool of potential buyers for Judaica historically largely ignored or neglected by other auction houses: they have quite simply changed the rules of the game. 3/
Private buyers have learnt - over the last decade especially - that regardless of the arrangements you make for scholarly access, to disclose your identity publicly is to invite vicious personal attacks from academics who recognize no role for private ownership of antiquities. 1/
I'm not at all referring to @papyrologyatman personally here, but making a more general point: there is no academic consensus on ANY acceptable model for the private ownership of antiquities, and increasingly the attitude is a sneering disdain for all private collecting. 2/
Collectors like Martin Schøyen who genuinely tried to engage with academia in the first two decades of the 21st century have paid a heavy price: by publicizing a collection, putting it online, or personally commissioning academic publications you simply make yourself a target. 3/