1/ The Conference Board, Dec. 22: “We project a US recession is likely to start around the beginning of 2023 and last through mid-year.”
2/ The stock market traditionally launches the broad and powerful advance heralding a new bull market [Breakaway Momentum] about three months before the end of a recession.
3/ So: If The Conference Board is correct – a giant “if” -- the stock market should generate Breakaway Momentum about three months before “mid-year” (i. e., late in the first quarter or during the second quarter).
4/ And -- if it does, it would help the market to validate all the statistical studies in September assuring us that the market had a 100% probability of being higher a year later.
5/ But for all that to happen 1) we need to have a recession and 2) it has to end by “mid-year”. Two very, very big assumptions…
6/ And there’s another thing: Sentiment needs to change.
7/ When a new bull market is launched it is *not* typically widely accepted or believed at the outset. A new bull market needs a “wall of worry” to climb.
8/ So rather than cheering for a Fed Pivot, sentiment should turn deeply skeptical of the Fed’s efforts: “The Fed will be pushing on a string” rather than “Yippee; the Fed Pivot is just around the corner”.
9/ There should also be general concern about the economy’s ability to recover quickly from the recession. Strong economic and earnings recoveries just aren’t usually taken for granted early in bull markets.
10/ But if everything falls into place, 2023 could turn out to be a pretty good year for the stock market.
11/ Sincere Happy and Healthy New Year wishes to all!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ A thread for those who asked about Whaley Breadth Thrusts:
In my opinion, they are extremely significant. I’ve felt that way ever since reading Wayne’s award-winning paper from 2010: docs.cmtassociation.org/pdfs/dowaward-…
2/ What makes them so valuable is that Whaley Breadth Thrusts are generated in only five days. “Thrusts” that develop over a shorter timeframe have much less significant results, and it takes ten days to generate Breakaway Momentum.
3/ So, for me, a Whaley Breadth Thrust is the first legitimate signal that a really significant rally has begun.
The problem with ARK, IMO, is that even though they’ve identified the most innovative companies in the world there is a limit as to how much investors should pay for even the greatest company’s stock.
This is a memo I wrote during the height of the “dot.com bubble”, which I think gives you a pretty good feel of what the prevailing “Cisco at any price” sentiment was like at the time: deemermarketmemos.com/archive/2000s/…
It also discusses the environment during the Nifty Fifty “growth at any price” bubble in the early 1970’s.
Yes, in both cases they were really great companies -- but there is a limit as to how much investors should pay for even the greatest company’s stock.