Alexander Profile picture
Jan 1, 2023 25 tweets 7 min read Read on X
Are the top 20% of men showered with attention and are "Chads" poaching average women on dating apps?

What the OKCupid data show. 🧵
This chart is often interpreted to show that men are "fair" with women on dating apps. However, these are just ratings. Image
Here are ratings against a distribution of actual messages - "revealed preferences" if you will.

These charts are kind of a mess. ImageImage
A better way to visualize this data is in Rudder's book Dataclysm: Image
This is over one week and the OKCupid blog charts don't specify a time frame. But here are the ratios for men and women: Image
The number of messages that the most attractive men receive - even the top 5% - is incredibly small.

The most attractive women receive messages every day. The most attractive men do not.
Below average men receive about as many messages as men up to the top 10%.

Over a month, an average man might receive 4 messages. A man in the top 10% between 8-12. Image
This is expected - attractive people will receive more messages. But it's a remarkably small difference for most men, even at the highest levels of attractiveness.
The ratio by attractiveness is the same.

But as this is a ratio, it doesn't mean that the absolute messages are the same for men and women. Image
An average woman receives about 5 messages per week, or 20 per month.

But a woman in the top 10% receives 25 per week and 100 per month. Image
Who sends messages also matters.

For women, less attractive women send more.

Attractive women send fewer messages - they don't need to send any at all. They receive a lot. Image
Attractive men, on the other hand, actually send more messages! Perhaps counterintuitive.

But maybe not - since attractive men still receive very few.

Attractive men can't sit back and just respond. They don't get that kind of attention, as attractive women do.
What we see from this data:

Even if you are a very attractive man, spontaneous attention is rare.

You have to send messages to women.

And for the most attractive women, you're competing with most men - men who are as attractive as you, more, less, etc.
Less attractive women send more messages.

First messages you receive from women are, unfortunately, unlikely to be from women that you really desire.

Beautiful women do not fall into your lap on apps.

Even for a "Chad."
Average women and below are also not killing it on dating apps.

How many of the 5 messages per week an average woman receives do you think is from a man she finds to be attractive?

Remember how women rate men on OKCupid: Image
Even when a woman is fairly compromising and goes on many dates it is common that she won't find most of the men attractive:

Also keep in mind - men outnumber women on dating apps 3 to 1.
The real picture we see from dating apps is that they don't work for a lot of people - including women.

They aren't a cornucopia of hot men available to average women.

A bit more like this: Image
The most attractive men also don't have easy access to the most attractive women, given the high rate of competition. (3 to 1.)

And they don't seem to be pursuing less attractive women much either.
About 40% of American relationships form on apps and about half of app users are happy.

This is either a good figure or a bad one depending on your level of pessimism.

But apps don't work for many people.

Women are not universally thrilled.

A big myth in the manosphere/incel spaces is that attractive men get showered with attention, despite putting in no effort.

The data here also indicate otherwise.
Attractive men message more.

Do you think men that put in effort to message more might also put in more effort to groom themselves and take good photos?

They are not sitting back, chilling, and getting female attention.

They are optimizing their app use.
This doesn't mean that if you're a 1/5 then a shower will make you a "Chad."

The point is that some people have a comical perception of how attractive men present themselves.

And how easy/hard dating is for attractive men.

Attractive men put in effort to compete.
A lot of discourse on "hypergamy" in the manosphere too - and it is always "female hypergamy."

You never see "male hypergamy."

Despite the fact men and women select for the most attractive people on apps at the same rate.

Men are not making hypogamous selections.
This is consistent with published research on dating apps, which also shows men and women value physical attractiveness the same.

Contrary to the narrative that men are selecting down.

Also based on actual messages: ImageImageImage

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alexander

Alexander Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @datepsych

Nov 19, 2023
Fat women are perceived as less attractive and less feminine, and subsequently receive less benevolent sexism. Image
From this paper: Image
Also true for older women and Black women: Image
Read 5 tweets
Oct 13, 2023
I rarely comment on the “bad dating behavior” vid genre, but this one is worth seeing.

The affective shift between video part 1 and part 2 is remarkable. He calmly tells her he will just drive her home (after she refuses to leave the car because she doesn’t like the restaurant).
There is a lot of discourse on “entitlement” and “delusion” that I think is driven by these viral videos.

Understandable - it’s behavior that is entitled and delusional.

The behavior of a spoiled child.
Read 18 tweets
Oct 6, 2023
As an undergraduate I remember learning that peer review was the litmus test for reputable, good science. It was this iron-clad thing. The ultimate seal of approval that lets you know if a paper is trustworthy.

But we were never taught what peer review actually consists of. 🧵
I suspect this is the case for most people: everyone learns that it’s really important, but not how the process works.

They imagine peer review as this well-oiled machine - rigorously vetting your methods and results - combing through your data to make sure it checks out.
Here is an illustration of the peer review process from Taylor & Francis.

At its core it’s a feedback system: 2-3 anonymous reviewers (other people in your field) read your paper and provide feedback. Image
Read 19 tweets
Oct 5, 2023
Underlying this is an inaccurate mental model of the romantic landscape: the belief that physical attraction doesn’t (or shouldn’t) have any impact on your relationship.

It does, though. If you make major improvements to your appearance then your partner may like you more.
Usually we see the opposite: people “let themselves go” in relationships and see a concurrent decline in sexual activity and relationship satisfaction.
“I look better and my husband is more attracted to me” isn’t exactly a bad problem to have, but some people will make a problem out of anything.
Read 7 tweets
Oct 1, 2023
We tend to think of passionate love as giving way to committed love with relationship duration. Basically, passion fades with time, but commitment remains (or grows).

However, passionate love may become increasingly important for relationship satisfaction in LTRs and marriage. Image
This model of love - Sternberg’s triangular theory of passion, intimacy, and commitment - can explain a large degree of variance in relationship satisfaction. Image
Similar in the results from this paper: Image
Read 19 tweets
Sep 28, 2023
The average relationship length beginning at age 18 is about two years. This increases with age; the older the cohort, the longer the relationship. 🧵
What factors predict having a long string of short duration relationships?

1. Personality disorders and poor mental health.

2. Substance abuse.

3. Higher orientation toward short term relationships (indiv diffs in sociosexuality).
This seems to be heritable and related to “pair bonding.” Infidelity, promiscuity, and relationship failure are all heritable. Image
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(