If technology is the engine that drives businesses, then economics is that which fuels it. One of the great barriers to career progression in the corporate sector is the lack of economics knowledge.
++
I have seen managers and people in leadership positions who have had their careers derailed because of their economic illiteracy. Of course, there are always those who sail through on luck and/or the gift of the gab but as the old adage goes – Exceptions do not make the rule.
++
Edmund Conway’s “50 economics ideas you really need to know” is a book that every aspiring leader/manager must grab hold of – it makes economics not only easy but imminently readable – a classic. Sample the following passage from the introduction:
++
‘A dreary, desolate and, indeed, quite abject and distressing [subject]; what we might call, by way of eminence, the dismal science.’
Thomas Carlyle’s description dates from 1849 but has stuck, for better or for worse.
++
One should hardly be surprised. Economics is something people usually take notice of only when things go wrong. Only when an economy is facing a crisis, when thousands lose their jobs, when prices rise too high or fall too fast, do we tend to take much note of the subject.
++
At such points there is little doubt it seems pretty dismal, especially when it underlines the challenges and restraints we face, spells out the reality that we can’t have everything we want and illustrates the fact that human beings are inherently imperfect.
++
The truth, I should add, in typical economist fashion, is fare less simple. If it were merely a study of numbers, of statistics and of theories then the dismal science analogy would perhaps hold more ground.
++
However, economics is, to its very heart, the study of people. It is an inquiry into how many people succeed, into what makes us happy or content, into how humanity has managed over generations to become more healthy and prosperous than ever before.
++
Economics examines what drives human beings to do what they do, and looks at how they reach when given a limited set of options and how they trade off against each other. It is a science that encompasses history, politics, psychology and, yes, the odd equation or two.
++
If it is history’s job to tell us what mistakes we’ve made over the past, it is up to economics to work out how to do things differently next time around.
//END//
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
While conducting some research for writing a paper on governance of Hindu temples and the need to free them from government control, I chanced upon a paper published by the Archaeological survey of India.
++
This is a paper published in 1984 in Epigraphia India by one KV Subrahmanya Ayyar who seems to have first published it 1931-32 and then submitted to the Epigraphical department of the (then) Madras presidency.
++
KVS Ayyar notes that the inscriptions engraved on the east wall of the first prākāra of the Viṣṇu temple of Veṅkaṭeśa Perumal located in Tirumukkudal in the Maduranthakam taluk of Chengelpet district in Tamil Nadu speak of generous grants by the chola king,
Have been reading this book (in Tamizh) – Vedamum Panpaadum by Shri Sharma Shastry. The format is in the form of a Q&A. Questions pertain to the shastras and anushtanas and Shri Sharma Shastry answers each one within the framework of the Shastras
++
it is this that makes this book an important guide for all those who consider the Dharma Shastras as Pramana. Come to think of it, there is no other pramana and/or guide for Hindus other than the shastras,
++
so in that sense rejecting the Shastras is akin to rejecting the Hindu dharma itself. The following is a free translation of Shri Sharma Shastry’s response to a question that is quite popular nowadays:
Listening to Sandeep Balakrishna on Jaipur dialogues on secularism and the issues around it and because of it.
I have a lot of regard for his scholarship and also the work that Dharma dispatch does. ++
However, he goes on and on about how Nehru institutionalised secularism, the Gandhi family has done this, that and so on... ++
Not one word on how after 8 full years we are in deeper trouble and secularism is not only being worshipped but the book that "enshrines" it is being treated as the new Gita...++
SAHASRANAMA OF VISHNU: 478 of 1,000
*************************************************************
Dharmiī {धर्मी} (1) He who supports Dharma. (2) He who upholds Dharma. (3) He who is the very seat and essence of Dharma. ++
(4) He who supports and upholds Dharma by himself following, practicing and propounding it while also encouraging, exhorting, and supporting those who follow Dharma.(Śaṅkara) ++
(1) He is known as “Dharmī” because he uses Dharma as the instrument (or means) for the performance of all his acts. (2) Bhagavān is known as “Dharmī” because he protects Dharma and uses it as the means to confer his protection on his devotees.(Parāsara Battar) ++
@joerogan
has made a fundamental mistake. He was doing very well till this apology... Even Scott Adams was praising his persuasion skills but now he has goofed up - The following fundamental rules are crucial: (Thread) + (1)
(1) Never apologize to a mob or a large group of people (2) Never apologize at a time when the mob is coming after you (3) Never apologize when you know deep within, that whatever you said or did was NOT WRONG + (2)
(4) Never apologize for past mistakes - the fact that you have moved on and are a better person today should suffice. All mistakes have an expiry date & they expire the moment you internally acknowledge the mistake - if it is not enough for someone, then they can go to hell + (3)
SAHASRANAMA OF VISHNU: 398 of 1,000
*********************************************
MĀRGAḤ {मार्ग:} (1) He who is the path on which liberation-seeking Yogis (ascetics) travel to attain to the state of immortality. (2) ‘Knowing him‘ is the path to the attainment of “mokṣa”. +
(3) He is the ‘path’ – there is no other way of “knowing him” and realizing that Nārāyaṇa except in the depths of one’s own “Self”.(Śaṅkara)+
(1) He is the path. (2) He who is sought after (by those seeking liberation). (3) He who is sought after by Ṛṣis like Bharadvāja and others. (4) The path shown by Sri Rāma is the faultless path. +