A thread from “Turtles All The Way Down,” a must read for anyone trying to understand the state of medical science today and the truth about childhood vaccine (non) safety. Exceptionally well researched and written by clearly veteran scientists.🧵(1)
This passage cannot emphasize enough how pervasive is Pharma’s control over peer-reviewed vaccine literature in medical journals. Only “positive” studies are published (most manipulated/fraudulent). Doctors believe every word (I used to) and then loudly & arrogantly promote jabs.
“Most people are unaware that the institutions funding vaccine science are not objective, their motives are not pure, and the science they fund is neither impartial nor objective.”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In 2017, a "non-profit" started receiving millions from Pharma to hire real (and fake) doctors to harass, censor and take away the medical licenses of anyone who challenged a "public health" narrative. This deadly censorship was then deployed for COVID. midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-vast-pha…
Recently we learned many of the people involved in this group faked their credentials. My colleague looked into it and realized much of what was done mirrored a sleazy internet marketing campaign seeking to profit off the situation. CNN "missed" this and put them on national TV.
🧵Pre-Covid, me and my beautiful family were fully vaxxed. Covid led me to research vaccine science. This effort transformed my perception of vaccines & revealed decades of corruption in the medical sciences and the vaccination industry.🧵
Pro-vaccine propaganda has been immensely successful for many decades and ended up literally defining the field of Pediatrics. The idea that vaccines are the backbone of historic improvements in population health is built on myths. 🧵
Hotez & the WHO are doubling down, trying to bury the fact that, from the smallpox vaccine myth to the polio vaccine myth to now, it is actually “pro-vaccine activism” that is the major killing force globally. Immense data supports my conclusion.
@elonmusk 1/6 Elon and all parents, please watch...
The warnings my colleagues & myself have given on the Covid-19 injections for children have been clear. The FDA has plowed ahead w/ the decision to approve even though risks far outweigh the benefits.
Thread on New Variant: I have been getting a lot of questions about what some in the media are calling “Deltracron.” A more accurate name for the latest COVID variant is Ba.2 since it is clinically most similar to the Ba.1 Omicron variant (1/4) dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…
We continue to learn more about Ba.2 and although the data is still being collected, this new variant does not appear to be more severe than Omicron. There is no reason for an elevated concern at this time (2/4)
Like other variants, Ba.2 accounts for many of the new COVID-19 cases and is currently present in approximately 35% of all COVID infections worldwide and at last count, only 3.5% of U.S cases. This trend is expected as the COVID-19 virus continues to mutate (3/4)
THREAD: I wrote this substack last night pierrekory.substack.com/p/saturday-nig… and then woke up to this inspirational comment: "Without your phenomenal group at the FLCCC, your treatment guidance & protocols, & the morale boost acquired each time I zoom on wednesday evenings, I would.. (1/4)
be forced to exit healthcare. In 21 years of Emergency Medicine practice I have never been so despondent about humanity. Shift after shift I am ostracized, defamed and ridiculed for my unvaccinated status even though I maintain silence publicly. (2/4)
I know this is slightly off topic from your post, but you should know that we are listening…we are employing your protocols to help heal family and neighbors (as we are not allowed to do so in the hospital), we are pushing back on pharmacists who deny us. (3/4)
Thread re: retraction of the FLCCC paper from the Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
It is unfortunate that JICM retracted an entire paper based on their refusal to accept an update to 1 section of data that had little relevance to the focus or conclusions of the paper (1/8)
This was a comprehensive paper - 13 sections, nearly 200 scientific references detailing the science behind each MATH+ element of the 2020 protocol. The data in question was in 1 section and WAS ACCURATE when we originally submitted- i.e. a 6% COVID mortality at Sentara (2/8)
After peer-review & publication, a very unusual request came to us from JICM. Sentara Hospital asked the journal that the paper be updated with longer-term follow up data calculated differently (they never said our original data was inaccurate). (3/8)