Women care for and help household members 2.08 more hours per day than men in the most extreme case presented by Table 8A, but men work 6.43 hours more per day than women.
Yes, there are unskilled jobs (see, e.g., 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1568(a), 416.968(a)) and that method of classifying jobs is important to disability benefits claimants. How skilled a claimant’s past work is and how transferable their skills are can dramatically impact their claim.
The classification of work as skilled, semiskilled, and unskilled is necessary in the fair adjudication of disability benefits claims in the United States of America 🇺🇸.
20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1568(a), 416.968(a) states “[u]nskilled work is work which needs little or no judgment to do simple duties that can be learned on the job in a short period of time” (ssa.gov/OP_Home/cfr20/… | ssa.gov/OP_Home/cfr20/…).
There was a time when no one was awarded child support. The historical basis of child support is in the idea that middle class and rich women were incapable of working enough to support themselves. #GenderedLaborGap.
Women have a suite of birth control options prior to conception or blastocyst uterine implantation and a suite of parental responsibility termination options thereafter without legal abortion and even in the case of rape.
| archive.ph/eFzr0), but go bigger—instead of 24 hours, let’s give women 31 days without men. Every man goes out into the wilderness to fish, hunt, or hike for 31 days camping out away from civilization—once.
Just imagine almost completely wiping out the workforce for the transportation and energy generation sectors for 31 days because they all went on a group vacation for 31 days.
What would women do without electricity, gas, gasoline, running water, groceries, etc., for 31 days?
How many women are Eagle Scouts or Gold Award recipients or the equivalent?
@greybalance1@FTravellin@SSS_gov The principle of desuetude only applies when a court says it does. Cite the court case or it doesn’t apply. …or, if you are sure it applies, but there is no court case, be the first person who argues it. Then and only then will I (and any rational person) believe you.
@greybalance1@FTravellin@SSS_gov “American courts have not historically embraced the notion of desuetude….” Hillary Greene, “Undead Laws: The Use of Historically Unenforced Criminal Statutes in Non-Criminal Litigation” 16 Yale L. & Pol'y Rev. 169, 191 (1997–1998) (opencommons.uconn.edu/cgi/viewconten…).
@greybalance1@FTravellin@SSS_gov “Desuetude has arisen rarely in American jurisprudence…. The case of District of Columbia v. John R. Thompson Co. ostensibly establishes the American rejection of desuetude… [by the United States Supreme Court].” 16 Yale L. & Pol'y Rev. 191 (1997–1998); 346 U.S. 100 (1953).
@FTravellin@MisandryE 50 U.S.C. § 3802(a): "it shall be the duty of every male citizen of the United States, and every other male person residing in the United States, who… is between the ages of eighteen and twenty-six, to present himself for and submit to registration [for Selective Service]."
@FTravellin@MisandryE 50 U.S.C. § 3811(f)(1): "any person who is required… to present himself for and submit to registration under such section and fails to do… shall be ineligible for any form of assistance or benefit provided under title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965."
@FTravellin@MisandryE 29 U.S.C. § 1504: "each individual participating in any program… or receiving any assistance or benefit under [the Job Training Partnership Act], has not violated section 3 of the Military Selective Service Act… by not presenting and submitting to registration as required."