Calling out #Poilievres simplistic sloth "As the fmr chief of police for Ottawa, I have seen first-hand the positive effect that a safer supply can have on an individual’s life. We can even look at the program operating right now in Ottawa,
"where Mr. Poilievre is currently the sitting MP The patrons of supervised consumption sites are not only given the chance to survive their addictions, but when under the care of a medical professional instead of a street dealer, they have a chance to live long enough to take."
"to be offered alternative paths, which they often choose The fact that Mr. Poilievre misses this point entirely is disappointing, as his counterparts in the House of Commons and the Senate have understood the importance of removing street-manufactured opioids from the sites."
"In fact, the Canadian Police Association and the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police have both supported the use of replacement drugs. Using a safe supply to save lives is key to what we should all be doing – taking care of some of our most vulnerable citizens."
"I have never met a drug addict who wanted to be addicted, living on the streets, committing crimes to purchase drugs – It is easy for Mr. Poilievre to look at this in simple terms, but it is anything but." fmr Ottawa Police Chief Vernon White theglobeandmail.com/opinion/articl…
Ex Police Chief is being kind to Poilievre. Denying addicts safe supply, condemns them to a dangerous one. Offering simplistic solutions to complex problems is at the heart of parties like the CPC & UPC- precisely why today's Cdn Conservatism urgently needs a heart transplant.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Ran a little social experiment on Thursday. Some people have been telling me over the last few weeks that responding to Poilievre's excesses is a waste of time. It simply makes his fans even more intensely loyal to him. All he has to do is push the buttons of people to his left.
Those people then react and it makes his people defend him with even greater intensity. So Trump & Fox and others have been doing this forever. It's known as "Owning the Libs" So I wanted to see how this worked on the other side. I declared that @DavidAkin was not heckling.
Of course that isn't literally true. Just as when Poilievre says we don't live in a free country, it's not literally true. Compared to most countries Canada is very free. Compared to the way most news conferences plod along, Akin was a naughty mischief making nuisance - Heckler!
Why was @DavidAkin madder than a hatter? For the exact same reason any media professional would be and why any citizen of a democracy ought to be. "There were to be No questions. Those were the ground rules Pierre Poilievre’s people communicated to the press on Tuesday"
That's right no questions. So the media was invited to cover the near leader make a statement and that's it. No Questions. Any working professional would be thinking and or saying "I'm not a fucking stenographer for Poilievre." Now the new oppo leader's loyalists can
argue all day long that the press is the enemy, the press works for Trudeau or the WEF..But you have to ask yourself what kind of leader in a democracy expects to be taken seriously when he refuses to have media pros question him? Even Vladimir F-ing Putin takes questions.
There is a practical reason why it's important to report truth. The lethal weapon used by those who wish to dismantle democracy is the lie. Look I get that not everyone is as motivated as I was when I was a small child, and began to study the the creation of Fascist Propaganda.
I was trying to figure out why so many of my ancestors including my paternal grandparents had been murdered. The child's mind was trying to figure out why parents would for no apparent reason rapidly develop bouts of sadness and anger. The child wrongly thought he could help.
We all have our personal and family issues. But in the communities we live in, democracy is at stake and you need to know that nothing will destroy democracy faster than your neigbours believing and regurgitating lies. I personally don't give a rodent's rear end about
Gary Mason has all of a columnist's finest tools. The most important one is courage. Very few in this country have the guts to speak the truth about Pierre Poilievre. Mason lays it out in his latest @globeandmail column, which has a made him a target for acidic abusive vitriol.
"I also believe that certain politicians need to own some of what we are seeing. Pierre Poilievre, for instance, is the clear frontrunner to become the next leader of the Conservative Party of Canada. He has been a federal cabinet minister. He is not some random dude on the net."
"When he talks, people listen..lately, they have been listening in droves to the man. Yet in videos & speeches, Poilievre has blamed Trudeau for almost every problem...He has blamed him for high gas prices, high housing costs, high grocery bills, even calling it “Justinflation.”
"Mr. Jones was found liable last year for defaming the victims’ families while spreading bogus theories that the shooting had been part of a government plot to confiscate Americans’ firearms and that the victims’ families had been complicit in the scheme."
"This week’s trial was the first of three to determine how much Mr. Jones owes the families for the suffering he has caused, and the size of the award is sure to be contested. Jurors deliberated for about four hours before reaching Friday’s verdict."
Compensatory damages are based on proven harm, loss or injury, and are often calculated based on the fair market value of damaged property, lost wages and expenses, according to Cornell Law School.
"In another broadcast, Infowars falsely linked the judge to pedophilia and human trafficking; in another, Mr. Jones questioned the intelligence of the jurors in the case, implying that his political enemies had"
handpicked “blue-collar” people who “don’t know what planet they’re on,” and were ill-equipped to decide what monetary damages he must pay Ms. Lewis and Mr. Heslin. In written questions submitted to Mr. Jones, jurors took immediate issue with that characterization."
“Mr. Jones, did you know that 12 days ago, your attorneys messed up and sent me an entire digital copy of your entire cellphone with every text message you’ve sent for the past two years?” the parents’ lawyer, Mark Bankston, asked Mr. Jones.