🔎👀🔍
After @ReaganUdall issued its report on 12/19 torching FDA for widespread negligence, head honcho @DrCaliff_FDA called an urgent meeting, one that confirmed the very worst perceptions about his inept leadership.
THREAD 🧵
Was it a press conference to apologize to the American public? Or with Congress to explain the corruption? Nope. Outrageously, he hosted TFK’s Matt Myers and ALA’s Harold Wimmer.
Here’s confirmation of the meeting, posted on the scheduling page deep within FDA’s garbage barge of a website. No reporters from the national press on the FDA beat covered this development, natch.
Myers of course is the Typhoid Mary of the prohibition panic and Wimmer is ambidextrously corrupt by taking two-handed cash from both Bloomberg and the pharma companies whose nicotine therapies are threatened by vaping.
Here’s American Lung Association getting exposed recently for rank dishonesty on vaping by one of the country’s leading science journalists. bostonglobe.com/2022/08/10/mag…
And these are the two retrograde apparatchiks that Califf turned to first for help with spinning the utter debacle laid out so shamefully in the Reagan-Udall report.
No contrition, zero reflection. No effort whatsoever to grapple with corrective solutions to the litany of problems causing active harm to millions of Americans trying valiantly to quit smoking with the help of vaping.
Just immediate CYA with the two guys that are neck-deep in the politicized, dark-money pressure campaign that led FDA off the cliff. It’d be like getting charged with bank robbery and asking the getaway drivers for legal advice.
Hey here’s an idea. Why not take one of Reagan-Udall’s key recommendations and make public the video of the Califf-Myers zoom call?
That won’t happen, of course, since Califf has total contempt for mere citizens. We’re just the “twitterati” in his words. So instead we will FOIA the video and display it here when we get our hands on it.
Just look at what Califf said publicly later that same day. Here, we’ll translate from bureaucrat-ese:
• LOL, except for my surreptitious meetings.
• TFK agitprop.
• Gimme moar monayyyy.
You know who else ought to be insulted by these shameless shenanigans? The people at Reagan-Udall who put good-faith hard work into investigating FDA’s flaming dumpster and exposing how it got set alight.
Califf didn’t take them seriously or appreciate their efforts. The very first thing he did after reading their findings was to convene a zoom call with the exact people that caused the disaster so they could all try to evade accountability. What a disgrace.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Many states have levied taxes on vape products to protect children from nicotine. The result? Significant increases in teen smoking. 🤦♂️ This recent NBER paper illustrates why these taxes often backfire. nber.org/system/files/w… Let's take a closer look. THREAD. 🧵
Analyzing data from two nationally representative surveys, the researchers showed that vape taxes 1.) increase teen smoking rates and 2.) inflate the perceived risk of vaping.
This is not a surprising result. Several previous studies have found that vape taxes increase smoking across the board.
First and most importantly, flavor bans don't reduce smoking or vaping—they just force consumers to shop in other jurisdictions.
Since you can't tax a product once you outlaw it, what do governments do when flavor bans cut their revenue? Why, they just raise everybody's taxes of course!
Mainstream news coverage of the Reagan-Udall report has been rather abysmal. There were a few bright spots, but it was mostly the usual suspects cheerleading the government's never-ending quest for more money and authority over the lives of Americans. THREAD 🪡
But these stories generally ignored Reagan-Udall's blistering critiques of FDA's incompetence. No one reading the report could walk away feeling confident in America's tobacco regulatory system.
It is now beyond all dispute that the "EVALI" outbreak had nothing to do with nicotine vaping—though it was @CDCgov that wrongly included "e-cigarette" in that misleading acronym.
How that acronym got applied in the first place deserves its own investigation, though apparently none of the somnambulant journalists on the FDA or CDC beats can summon the curiosity to zero in on the answer.
A new study of several thousand daily and former daily smokers in France compared vaping and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) to see which method better helped people stay off cigarettes over 6, 12 or 24 months. The results were truly unexpected...🧵
Vaping was "significantly associated" with smoking cessation at 6, 12 and 24 months. NRT, well, not so much. sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
This isn't the first time NRT has failed to live up to its hype. Studies going back 16 years show that nicotine replacement is perhaps 30 percent less effective than smokers have been told.
The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation is a longtime champion and financial backer of anti-vaping propaganda. Since 2015, RWJ has given NPR more than $10 million to cover health topics.