About Sea Sparrow surface-air missile adaptation to UA Buk-M1 SAM systems that Politico has reported yesterday (politico.com/news/2023/01/0…).
It's not as surprising as it may seem at first.
In fact, Raytheon (Sea Sparrow manufacturer) and Polish WZU-2 worked on this in 2007+
->
As early as 2007 Wojskowe Zaklady Usbrojenia Nr 2 (WZU-2, Grudziadz, Poland) announced working on adapting Sea Sparrow RIM-7 missile to 2K12 Kub (SA-6) SAM system -- Buk predecessor. In 2012 a prototype was shown using RIM-162 ESSM missile on 2P25 Kub launcher.
->
Additionally, around the same time Czech company RETIA in cooperation with European missile manufacturer MBDA adapted Aspide 2000 surface-air missile (a derivative of Sea Sparrow RIM-7E with better engine and seeker) to the same Kub 2K12 system.
->
More details on the Czech 2K12 Kub modernization directly from the designer (RETIA) as well as some extra photographs:
->
Here's a video showing Czech Kub + Aspide hybrid tracking some training targets:
->
Finally, Ukraine is also no stranger to "deep" Kub SAM modification. For example a company called Aerotechnica has developed an upgrade package called 2K12M1-2D Kvadrat-2D which replaces "99% of electronics" with modern ones (mil.in.ua/uk/news/aerote…)
->
Given that Buk is a direct descendant of Kub (-M4,below) it should be no surprise if Sea Sparrow can be similarly adapted to Buk-M1 that Ukraine operates.
It would be great, if eventually ~90 Kub systems that Ukraine is reported to have could be refurbished and adapted too.
We normally don’t comment on political statements, however in his 23 APR 2025 social media post US President Donald J. Trump made 9 (nine!) factually false or misleading statements about UA so we had to address that.
Brief (and potentially incomplete) notes from a fresh interview w/ UA F-16 pilot:
- what missions F-16 and M2000 jets now perform
- their performance in UA
- RU glide bomb threat counteraction
- strike planning and intelligence
..and more
🧵
- the interviewee trained in the first group [of UA pilots to train on F-16]
- constantly perform:
* aerial recoinnaissance of the enemy objects and forces
* ELINT flights
* after integrating the above information perform missions to hit enemy ground targets
* 24/7 on call for air defense, defending important national objects, "our cities"
My brief (and rough) notes from an interview w/ Andriy Kobzar - a (now retired, after injury) commander of a Ukrainian German-supplied PzH-2000 (). This video interview (in Ukrainian) adds details on top of the interesting text interview referenced below
🧵
Is RU-UA war an artillery war:
- yes
- the role is dominant, the tactics evolves
- for RU, FAB/UMPK gliding bombs are playing some of arty role (because they have a lot of them and a lot of aviation)
Attack UAVs vs arty:
- UAVs do now complement some fraction of hits from the arty, but can not replace arty
- partly it's because of the wide spectrum of available arty ammunition. E.g. smoke arty shells, illumination shells, wide variety of modern programmable fuses.
Second half of my quick notes from an interview w/ UA Air Force head of aviation Gen. Serhii Holubtsov (). For the notes on the first half of the interview see linked thread.
The second half was mostly about F-16s and a little bit about JAS 39 Gripen.
🧵
F-16
Munitions:
- all airplanes will have improved "sight" (in Ukrainian usually that mean improved radar - no further details given), will [also] have pods for ground attack targeting
- Gen. Holubtsov won't give away technical details on air-to-air munitions or the radar modifications, but mentions "AIM-120 is used [on these airplanes] and its combat range, let's say according to 'some data', is up to 180+ km"
Quick notes from an interview w/ UA Air Force head of aviation Serhii Holubtsov (published today).
I normally don't do translations, but I see a lot of mistranslations/misinterpretations of this interview - thus this thread.
Notes of 1st half below🧵:
JDAM and other guided bomb use by UA:
- the quantities are limited thus limited effect on the battlefield
- enough airplanes have been modified to use them by now
- domestically UA produced glide/guide kits to be tested "in a few weeks"
- currenly GBU-39 and -62 are used w/ different warheads, these are highly effective
- their use is limited also by RU air defenses located on sovereign RU territory which UA was not allowed to target (presumably by donated weapons)
Brief update (with geolocations) on Malovodne-Burne (Mariupol) rail line construction by RU occupational forces.
Based on geolocated media footage we confirm that in Novomykhailivka area there will be a railroad segment (of undetermined length) with 2 parallel tracks.
🧵⬇️
Geolocation 1: video taken at Malovodne-Burne rail / hwy (T0508) intersection near Novomykhailivka.