You enter a room that hasn't had people there for four hours. Is masking needed? Do you need to flush the space (windows+HEPA)? How long does it need to be? Here's how you calculate it.
1/12
TLDR - The only people to weigh in on this is @O_S_P_E Indoor Air Quality Advisory Group which recommends 6 hours. I think it's a little conservative and you can go down to 4. Here's the math.
Disclaimer: "Safe" is the wrong word. The question is when does the room become reasonably low risk.
We'll start with flushing spaces. Once people leave, you can leave the ventilation on to clear out the space so when others enter risk is low. How much do you need to flush?
3/12
ASHRAE has weighed in on this. They recommend 3 air changes = 95% reduction in virus concentration. If you want to be very conservative, 5 air changes = 99% reduction. @O_S_P_E recommends 3 air changes too.
4/12
You don't need mechanical ventilation to give you 3 air changes. You get them naturally. There are 3 mechanisms: 1. Infiltration (I): air uncontrollably entering the building through the envelope or openings. 2. Decay (DC): virus naturally inactivating over time
5/12
3. Deposition (DP): virus landing on surfaces, so you can't inhale it.
So find the values for these and I+DC+DP = natural air change rate.
Here are the values:
6/12
Infiltration
This depends on the building envelope and weather. These are the values from RETScreen. Most conservative is 0.2, but that would correspond to a well performing building. Most would be much higher - probably closer to 0.5 air changes per hour (ACH).
7/12
Decay
This depends on the variant, temperature & humidity. If half-life is 2 hours, then 63% decay = 1 ACH is in about 2.5 hours, so decay is about 0.4 ACH.
My desktop twitter froze and deleted the rest of my thread. I can’t link to the publications nicely through my phone. Once it’s working again, I’ll link to the publications.
Other publications indicate decay is 0.2-0.63 ACH. I’ll use 0.4 ACH
9/12
For deposition, literature indicates between 0.2 to 0.43 ACH. I’ll use 0.2.
So I=0.5, DC=0.4, DP=0.2 ACH
0.5+0.40+0.2 ACH = 1.1 natural ACH
So after 3 hours, you already have more than 3 air changes. Wait for four hours and you built in a safety buffer.
10/12
@O_S_P_E guidance assumes worst case scenario. To be more conservative, wait for more air changes or use lower rates for infiltration, deposition or decay. It’s 1 in a million odds at that point.
11/12
For flushing rooms yourself with windows and HEPA, see this:
12/12
I was shipped this PC fan box and put it together. It looks really good. I think for many situations, this is the best option out there. Here are some thoughts about it.
1/11
I stated earlier on my blog: we need a PC fan air cleaner that is durable and looks good. While durability and looks are not the most important aspects of air cleaners, many companies want that. We now have it.
2/11
It took me about 1.5 hours to put together. It was a little more difficult than the @cleanairkits ones because Clean Air Kits uses plugs to snap the fans on instead of screws. This could be something adjusted in the future. 3/11
The blood libel is a deep scar from Jewish history. Jews were accused of slaughtering Christian children and baking their blood into the matzah we eat on Passover. It lead to pogroms against Jewish communities where many Jews were massacred.
We just witnessed a new blood libel created over the past day. Unverified claims by Hamas were promoted by MSF, the UN, politicians and many major media outlets.
We've seen the resurrection of all the classical antisemitism: pogroms, massacres, blood libels, death squads
This is a description of the Khmelnytsky massacres in Ukraine 1648–1649.
Since I first published this post, there have been multiple experiments showing ozone is a concern when using far-UV and needs to be taken into consideration.
In the post, I discuss how initially we didn't think it was a concern. I think ASHRAE needs to update their guidance on different UV wavelengths.
I have far-UV in my house. I think for personal residential use, it can be used in a limited way if you understand the risks with ozone and mitigate it with open windows when in use. That's how I use it.
Here are the equivalent clean airflow rates from the recent ASHRAE Standard 241 Control of Infectious Aerosols. I've calculated the equivalent air changes per hour and the equivalent CO2 (if all the clean air was outdoor air).
These rates are doubled when there is "vocalization above a conversational level" (e.g. singing)
I'll be hosting a space with the chair of the committee @WBahnfleth to discuss these rates and more. Please join and message for any questions you have. twitter.com/i/spaces/1gqGv…
To determine the ACH and CO2, I had to make assumptions about density and metabolic rate. I used values from ASHRAE standard 62.1 or found the closest approximation. If densities are different, the equivalent ACH would be different. It doesn't affect flow/person or CO2.
What should you ask about your indoor air quality?
There are things individuals can do to improve the IAQ in their own space, but it ultimately falls on the building owners and operators to provide clean air. Here are some things you should ask to know about the IAQ.
1/10
1. Outdoor Airflow (OA)
- Is the system constant volume or variable volume?
- If it is constant volume, what is the airflow to the room (in cubic feet per minute [CFM] or liters per second [lps])
- if it's variable volume, what is the max and min airflow?
2/10
- what is the minimum OA % supplied during occupied hours?
- what is the occupancy schedule?
- is the system always running during occupied hours/auto mode?
- how often is it checked and maintained?
"We need HEPA filtration, CO2 at 600 ppm and 100% outdoor air everywhere"
I see these types of comments non-stop. They are wrong and unhelpful. They show misguided ignorance about indoor air quality and what is actually required.
I'll start with filtration - you do not care about the filter efficiency. You care about the system effectiveness which is measured as a clean air delivery rate. MERV-13 with 300 cubic feet per minute (CFM) is identical to HEPA with 230 CFM. There's no reason to prefer HEPA.
Furthermore, air handling units can't handle HEPA filters. Demanding this is absurd when it will only increase cost and won't provide any benefit over MERV-13.
Having MERV-13 as the standard is sufficient for particulate matter issues.