Just as a heads up, this is a book claiming that there was a "multiracial black and brown coalition for civil rights" in Texas.
Most clips I've been sharing on this feed are from their own oral history project. They did these interviews but insist that Mexicans were segregated and treated similar to black people - even though their interviewees are honest that they were not.
The book boldly claims that there was a LEGAL system of "Juan Crow Laws" in Texas alongside Jim Crow.
Please attend, and politely raise questions. Latinx revisionists expect to be able to make up stories, without any pushback. Let them know that we're on to them.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
When U.T was a white-only school, there were many Latin students from various countries, even some with "obvious traces of Negro ancestry", while blacks were explicitly barred. An Anglo alum pointed out this contradiction in a letter to Governor Stevenson
#Latinxrevisionism
Some people ask, "How could everybody be lying?" Well, we've seen something like this before. Not long ago a lot of people deluded themselves into believing that the Irish had been slaves and claimed it was all forgotten or ignored.
The myth of Mexican/Latino segregation is Texas history in identical to the Irish slavery myth but bigger.
This is not something that officially happened in Texas. Segregation had nothing to do with Mexicans, but they say that it was all happening "as a social custom". They show the same two signs over and over and say "these were signs everywhere!".
#LatinxRevisionism on KPBS.
Andrea Guerrero, an immigrant rights activist, went on TV and made up a bunch of stories, claiming that Latinos were subject to "white only" Jim Crow Laws, and attempts to write them into the civil rights narrative.
#AffirmativeAction
Remember: The "hispanic" minority group was politically fabricated for the purpose of AA. The label artificially made "people of Spanish origin" into official minorities so that they could masquerade as POC and get preferences that were never intended for them.
This is what Mexican political groups wanted when they fought for this new designation. The thought of a "hispanic" minority group would not exist today if it were not for the 1964 civil rights act and Affirmative Action. forgottenlatinohistory.blogspot.com/2021/06/she-ma…
All arguments in favor of AA fall short when it comes to the mystical "hispanic" minority group. Why should "Latinos" qualify for Affirmative Action in higher education if Latin American people were NEVER historically excluded from higher education in American history?
How did segregation on buses work? Colored people normally had to sit in the back, but if the bus was full, whites got the seats in the back and colored people had to stand. This Mexican woman was a white lady that "never had any problems".
via @YouTube
A common complaint "Lah-tee-nos" make is that the white-black story of segregation and civil rights ignores them. No, it does not! The way to be inclusive is to explain to Latino children that they are part of the white-black story.
"Latinos" were here in the Jim Crow era, but they were on the white side of the color line.
The series "A League of their own" is stirring up discussion of "Latinos" and race in the Jim Crow era. The AAGPBL was racially segregated - but had Latin American players. Some are starting to explain that by claiming that they were "white-passing". autostraddle.com/a-league-of-th…
The use of the term "white-passing" to describe white people from Latin countries is problematic. It pretends that they were POC who pretended to be white. In the 40s, Latin Americans were normally considered white. They didn't have to "pass" for anything.
The history of "passing for white" in the U.S is Black-American history and actually has nothing to do with "Latinos". Claiming that "Latin" people were passing for white serves to mask the inherent white privileges that they had at the time.