1/ I am glad @bruce_arthur took the time to speak with me about my views and my record.
Unfortunately, his article is full of mistruths and misquotes, starting with the headline.
2/ I did *not* say I won't "miss public health."
Based on all the kind farewell notes I have received from professionals in the field this week, I daresay I might be missed back.
3/ I did *not* compare prom to "a living death."
I did *not* "compare mask mandates to the MeToo movement."
4/ I did *not* say that "only randomized control trials are sufficient evidence for pandemic policy."
5/ I did *not* say that "vaccine delivery was the only intervention in the pandemic that [I believe] was justified."
6/ I understand that Bruce and the Toronto Star are in an awkward position. They were wrong about vaccine mandates, wrong about mask mandates, wrong about border restrictions, wrong about school closures.
7/ Haldimand-Norfolk had 30% less Covid mortality over the pandemic than the provincial average. Their success throws the Toronto Star's mistakes into sharp relief.
8/ I wish @TorontoStar would acknowledge its mistakes, rather than double down by misrepresenting the facts of the matter and my views.
I have texted Bruce to try and figure out how my comments were misinterpreted this way but so far no response.
(Update: he texted back as this thread was being published, and I have registered my disagreement.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Seeing people face-to-face is meaningful to most people, I think.
The potential benefit of face masks in the prevention of infectious disease needs to be balanced against the definite benefit of seeing people face-to-face.
To achieve that balance, we need to do our best to understand what the potential benefits of face masks are.
There is a traditional medical literature on the potential benefits of face masks.
That literature is helpfully summarized by this Cochrane review:
3/ Why would you kick someone out of school because they didn't take a booster 8 months ago that is currently providing ~0% protection against transmission?
Pretension? Malice? Callus disregard for people who think differently than you? I'm struggling to understand.
1/ Apologize. Pick up the phone and call everyone you fired over unethical, ineffective, unscientific vaccine mandates. Ask them to come back. Then apologize to everyone who is still at work but felt coerced.
2/ End the mask mandates. It's been 2.5 years that HCW haven't seen each other smile or had a non-muffled conversation. This takes a psychological toll. Hard to measure, but it's real:
As a frontline physician, I saw horrendous things: hopelessness and heartlessness wrought both by the virus but also by our, at times, counterproductive restrictions.
Today, I am grateful that these are (almost) all over.
(1/x)
I am especially grateful for my physician colleagues across Canada who had the courage and insight to speak forthrightly about all this even as the fearmongering media called for their heads.
Here are some. A thread. .
(2/x)
Ari Joffe is a pediatric ICU doctor and bioethicist in Edmonton. His paper in Front Public Health was one of the first and most comprehensive academic summaries of why not to pursue lockdowns.