The M26 Pershing was rushed to Europe to fight German tanks at the end of World War II. With greater armor and firepower, the Pershing was a substantial improvement over the M4 Sherman. 1/5
However, the 46-ton Pershing used the Ford GAF 500 horsepower V8 engine, a slightly modified version of the standard 35-ton Sherman’s GAA engine with similar horsepower. This meant that the heavier Pershing suffered mobility issues due to its power to weight ratio.
2/5
In 1948, work began on a Pershing variant with a Continental AV-1790 V12 engine which gave 810 horsepower. This was designated as the M46 Patton and began arriving to U.S. Army tank battalions shortly before the Korean War began.
3/5
The M46s combination of firepower, protection, and mobility allowed it to eventually replace both the M26 Pershing and the M4A3 Sherman in the mountainous combat of Korea.
4/5
Though the M26A1 Pershing and M46 Patton look similar from the front, the change of power plant required a different layout in the exhaust system. The M46 is identifiable by its fender mounted mufflers and exhaust, whereas the M26 featured a central exhaust on the back hull. 5/5
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#antitankthursday: M136 AT4. The AT4 is a disposable, unguided, shoulder-launched anti-tank weapon designed in Sweden and introduced in 1987. It was designed to give dismounted units a system capable of engaging vehicles that could then be discarded. 1/5
While not as effective as anti-tank guided missiles, the AT4 is less expensive and simpler to train on. In fact, all the instructions for the single-shot launcher are written on the side! 2/5
Unlike the World War II American Bazooka it resembles, the AT4 does not fire a rocket but an explosive charge that fires the high-explosive anti-tank projectile while a second charge blasts to the rear to negate recoil, similar to a recoilless rifle. 3/5
The Sacrifice of the 9th Armored Division's Task Forces Rose and Harper, 18 December 1944
1/11
78 years ago during the Battle of the Bulge, Combat Command Reserve (CCR) of the 9th Armored Division fought a desperate battle to prevent German forces from reaching the vital crossroads town of Bastogne, Belgium.
2/11
The CCR was divided into two units to establish defensive roadblocks: Task Force Rose (under Captain L.K. Rose) at Lullagne, Luxembourg and Task Force Harper (under Lieutenant Colonel Ralph S. Harper, 2nd Tank Battalion Commander) at Allerborn, Luxembourg.
78 years ago today, the Germans launched a surprise offensive through the Ardennes region of Belgium and Luxembourg in what became known as the Battle of the Bulge. 1/5
The German Wehrmacht began the attack with a 13 division assault. Many of these units were veterans pulled from fighting the Soviets on the Eastern Front. 2/5
Their final objective was to seize the ports of Antwerp, cut off the Western Allies' supply lines, and force a negotiable peace treaty. The U.S. forces in the area of the attack were taken by complete surprise.
3/5
72 years ago, America and South Korean troops were conducting a desperate defense of the Pusan Perimeter in the Korean War. 1/9
On the night of 31 August 1950, then-Sergeant First Class Ernest R. Kouma of A Co, 72nd Tank Bn was tasked to defend a crossing point of the Naktong River with two M26 Pershing tanks and two M19 gun motor carriages in support of A Co, 9th Infantry Regt, 2nd Infantry Division. 2/9
Kouma had originally enlisted during World War II and had served with the 9th Armored Division in that conflict.
At 2200 hrs (10:00pm) local time, North Korean troops begin a massive assault. 3/9
Exactly two years ago today, we moved our first tank (the U.S. M1918 3-Ton light tank) into our brand new home: the Armor & Cavalry Training Support Facility, or as we call it "The Tankodrome".
In that time we have moved over 180 armor artifacts into the building, with an additional 70+ large artifacts moved into our second building, the Armor & Cavalry Conservation Center.
This has been all while teaching or supporting training and development for over 15,000 U.S. Army Soldiers. There is still much work to be done, to include the movement of our archives and over 8,000 smaller artifacts.
1/5 The EM-50 Urban Assault Vehicle was an armored personnel carrier prototype developed in the late 1970s. Built by the General Motors Corporation, the EM-50 was designed to blend in while conducting counterinsurgency, security, and stability operations.
2/5 It featured a wide array of weapon and defensive systems. In 1981, the sole EM-50 was sent overseas to Italy for field testing. It ended up causing an international incident when it was inadvertently driven across the border to Czechoslovakia.
3/5 Details of the border incident are still considered classified by both NATO and former Warsaw Pact nations (mostly out of embarrassment). After returning back to the United States, the EM-50 was placed into storage at Aberdeen Proving Grounds for some time.