An Ohio teacher, who was reading The Sneetches to her Grade 3 class, was abruptly cut off by an admin when a student said "It's almost like what happened back then, how people were treated. Like, disrespected. Like, white people disrespected Black people.”
dispatch.com/story/news/edu…
There's a bit more context, but none of it is exculpatory. The occasion was a visit from NPR's Planet Money, which was recording an episode about how economics gets discussed and taught in children's books. One of the readings that day was The Sneetches. And you can see why.
Robek, the teacher, is just a page or so in when the following exchange takes place.

npr.org/transcripts/11…
If you're a teacher, this is gold. Noah, a 3rd grade student, has connected the book to something else he knows. He's thinking things through, analyzing a text, applying what he's learned. Parents, you know what I'm talking about. It's magic.
Suddenly, Beeman, a school admin present for the recording, starts waving her hands and interrupts Robek. "I just don't think it might be appropriate," she says of The Sneetches.
But the kids still really want to know how The Sneetches ends! Beeman tries to fend them off with some nonsense about standing up for your bellies, but they remain unsatisfied. So she says to go ask your parents.
Bear in mind that this was a comment initiated by the student, not the teacher. And note that the teacher was already moving on before the interruption. But as Beeman explained, parents should be warned before any conversation about discrimination takes place.
And that, said Jeffrey on Twitter that day
Is the stupidest thing I've heard anyone say.
Should teachers need parents to give their consent
Before any second of class time is spent
On answering students with questions on race?
My God. How'd we ever wind up in this place?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeffrey Sachs

Jeffrey Sachs Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JeffreyASachs

Jan 11
Oddly missing from this piece, which discusses at length the debate over whether teachers may use a child’s preferred pronouns w/o parental permission is the fact that multiple bills currently sit in state legislatures that would let teachers ignore parents who say yes.
I’m on my phone and can check my list, but I’d say there’s something like 10-15 bills introduced since 2022 that would allow teachers to ignore parents who want their child referred to by a pronoun/name that doesn’t fit the child’s gender at birth. Parents rights indeed!
I also know off hand that at least one school district in Texas (maybe Grapevine ISD) already has this policy on the books. Teachers MUST respect parents who want their kids to use birth pronouns, but DO NOT need to respect parents who say the opposite.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 6
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIncredible. Across two overwhelmingly contemptuous articles at (of all things) @AccuracyInMedia, this dude mocks liberal media for getting fact after fact wrong about the Stop WOKE Act.

But here's the amazing reality: He's looking at the WRONG LAW. ImageImage
@AccuracyInMedia Seriously, read these pieces. The sheer, brazen dismissiveness of Stop WOKE Act critics and the publications (@HuffPost & @propublica) that publish them. And ALL of it is based on a misunderstanding so fundamental it beggars belief.
aim.org/aim-column/med…
aim.org/aim-column/huf… ImageImage
@AccuracyInMedia @HuffPost @propublica Working backwards through the links, it's clear the author is looking at SB 148, the Senate version of the Stop WOKE Act that was rejected and replaced by the House version, HB 7, back in March 2022.

Why was it rejected? Because it wasn't extreme enough.
flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2…
Read 8 tweets
Jan 5
This one may not seem important at first, but it is. Matters are fast coming to a head in Florida, where a gov working group is putting the finishing touches on new school library guidelines. The working group, which is dominated by Moms 4 Liberty folks...
popular.info/p/dont-say-gay…
...has been taking provisions from HB 1557 (the Don't Say Gay Act) and applying them to libraries. Why is that a problem? Because HB 1557 *only applies to classroom instruction*. Supporters always insisted that libraries would be unaffected, letting students who choose to read...
...a book with gay or trans characters free to do so. Only classroom instruction, where the students is "captive", was in the crosshairs.

That's what they told us, anyway. It's just not how things have worked out.
Read 6 tweets
Jan 2
Three theses: 1) Great literature has never in the course of written history been as accessible as it is today. Never. Translations have never been better, context and scholarly commentary never more plentiful, the physical objects never so cheap. We have run out of excuses.
With just 5 seconds of googling, you can look into Chapman’s Homer. By just clicking on the link below, you can understand that reference and read along with it a good chunk this language’s entire poetic patrimony. It’s never been so easy.

gutenberg.org/cache/epub/666…
2) Sometimes, great literature does requires specialized knowledge. It helps to know what the Darien peak is or when Uranus was first sighted. Knowing all that helps…but not much. Great lit creates its own context.
Read 7 tweets
Jan 1
One of my resolutions for 2023 is to have higher standards, so let me start on a sour note and say that this list is trash. Adults should strive for more.
Look, there are some good books on the list, but that’s not the point. It’s bad *as a list*, as a kind of aspirational reading schedule for the year. I get that I sound snobby, but it’s frustrating to see someone with pretensions to intellectual leadership set this as a goal.
But you know what else? It’s still not as frustrating as the dozen people in my replies saying we should just be happy that he’s reading books — as if that’s how far we’ve fallen. Or that “It’s pretty good for a computer scientist” — what does that even mean?
Read 4 tweets
Dec 15, 2022
Time for one last round with @TheFIREorg. Two weeks ago, I offered some constructive(?) criticism of FIRE's policies and strategic choices. Last week, @NicoPerrino responded with a strong defense. I still think he's wrong, though, and explain why below.

chronicle.com/article/fire-i…
@TheFIREorg @NicoPerrino 1) Yes, @TheFIREorg really should be doing much more to promote free speech/academic freedom in religious schools. Just because those schools have a constitutional *right* to censor (a right FIRE must fight to protect!), should not immunize them from FIRE's strongest critique.
@TheFIREorg @NicoPerrino After all, @TheFIREorg's mission isn't simply to defend the constitutional right to free speech. That's far too narrow. Rather, it's to promote free speech even where the right to censor exists. That's why it's launched such an aggressive campaign against cancel culture.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(