Whatever terms you may infer as #reality, ‘Y’ [Consequences], is only a #subjective element of ‘Y’
Philosophically it is the A Priori. That the only knowable truth is knowable as truth that only Y is Y. Anything else is y [interacting components], such as yourself.
Philosophically it is the A Priori. That the only knowable truth is knowable as truth that only Y is Y. Anything else is y [interacting components], such as yourself.
EXPRESSIONS convey Actions & Consequences.
Would Eris have thrown the apple, if she was the apple (?)
Anything but Y is the a posteriori, all truth in your perception is truth subjective, not the Truth which Consequence, which has no literal depiction, other than what it does.
Would Eris have thrown the apple, if she was the apple (?)
Anything but Y is the a posteriori, all truth in your perception is truth subjective, not the Truth which Consequence, which has no literal depiction, other than what it does.
Is Duck y then not Duck Y (?) No. No duck has volume as duck has volume. No duck has area, perceivable a posteriori of an a posteriori Duck. No duck can not be Y, because no duck is knowable (as not duck).
Is discordianism a religion (?) A philosophy (?) A paradigmatic model (?) No one knows.
Perhaps it’s a parody of religious & secular schisms: the flux of what could be & not be, as much as what is plausible yet not.
Perhaps it’s a parody of religious & secular schisms: the flux of what could be & not be, as much as what is plausible yet not.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
