Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Kingmaker - Big IF! (True) Profile picture
@KingMakerFT
Jan 13, 2023 • 4 tweets • 1 min read • Read on X
In this clip Devin Nunes discusses the latest Twitter Files #14, in which Twitter determined there were no Russian bots behind the #ReleaseTheMemo movement, in which Twitter users argued for the release of the Nunes memo on the Russia hoax. rumble.com/v259sej-nunes-…
Prominent Dems pushed Twitter to shut it down anyway, using nonexistent Russian bots as a false pretext. The most interesting part of this clip begins at the 7:50 mark. It seems that the new special counsel, Hur, was in the DOJ at the time and was one of those “dirty cops”-
The Russiagate hoaxers who fought Nunes tooth and nail to prevent the memo exposing the hoax from becoming public. Hur played a critical role in drafting and editing an official letter stating that releasing the Nunes memo would harm national security.
Of course the release of the memo did no such thing. All it did was to expose the corruption at the top levels of the FBI and DOJ in going along with the Clinton bought and paid for Russia hoax. Hur was part of the coverup. I wonder if SC Durham has talked to SC Hur.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Kingmaker - Big IF! (True)

Kingmaker - Big IF! (True) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KingMakerFT

Kingmaker - Big IF! (True) Profile picture
Apr 6
Excellent analysis of the implications of the DC Bar’s attempt to disbar former DOJ official, Jeff Clark. I’d like to weigh in on the concepts of fraud vs irregularities in the election, a subject addressed at length during the hearing.
The DOJ took the position in 2020 that they only would investigate criminal fraud and civil rights violations in connection with the election. So when Clark drafted a letter from the Department to Ga legislators, Clark went beyond the DOJ’s role by including irregularities.
Stop for a minute and consider what that means. Fraud operates in the shadows. Concealment is the name of the game for every fraudster from time immemorial. So when a law enforcement official claims, “We only investigate fraud, not irregularities,” in effect abdicating his duty.
Read 13 tweets
Kingmaker - Big IF! (True) Profile picture
Feb 25
Regardless of how one views Smirnov’s credibility ( he made it all up in 2020 or, as @walkafyre notes, he has a bad memory), it’s undeniable the FBI does not look good here. The first 1023 was in 2017, in the financial crimes investigation of Zlochevsky that was opened Jan 2016.
The official FBI version b/f the indictment was nobody thought to ask for three years about Smirnov’s throw away line about Hunter being on the Burisma board. What? How can that be irrelevant to an investigation of Burisma’s owner committing theft and money laundering? Nobody ask
Then when they finally do go ask, they get a wild tale of bribery of a sitting US VP and his son, the board member. A tale that if true, the CHS had concealed from his handler for at least four years. But nobody drilled down into that. Again, the working policy was “Don’t ask.”
Read 5 tweets
Kingmaker - Big IF! (True) Profile picture
Feb 13
For those who followed the defamation lawsuit by Michael Mann against journalist Mark Steyn, and the $1 million punitive damage award against Steyn, should read this expert report by climate scientist Judith Curry: judithcurry.com/2024/02/08/jcs…
Ms Curry, @curryja , was allowed to testify for Steyn, but the court excluded her expert report and the opinions it contained: the hockey stick graph was misleading and constituted scientific misconduct because it cherry-picked data, inverted data, and concealed underlying data.
@curryja In other words, @curryja holds views similar the the ones Steyn expressed that got him hit with $1 M in punitive damages. (He described the hockey stick as fraudulent). Ms Curry was not sued, probably b/c she’s a scientist and can back her views up with science.
Read 13 tweets
Kingmaker - Big IF! (True) Profile picture
Dec 19, 2023
I’m not surprised by the decision based on what I heard listening to the argument on Friday. I am surprised about the short thrift the court gave to the federal role in presidential elections.
According to the 11th Circuit, only the states and Congress have a role in federal elections. What about federal Constitutional concepts like “One man, one vote?” The DOJ is authorized and obligated to enforce that rule.
Read 4 tweets
Kingmaker - Big IF! (True) Profile picture
Dec 12, 2023
Wow! The inestimable, brilliant and dogged @ClimateAudit has unearthed further proof of fraud underlying the original “hockey stick” depiction of where the climate was headed if mankind didn’t curtail burning of fossil fuels. It turns out that critical tree line data were hidden
climateaudit.org/2023/12/12/dis…
And that concealed data, recently discovered by @ClimateAudit, tells a completely different story than the hockey stick graph about the relationship between CO2 and world temperatures. The climate scientists tried to pull a fast one. They can run, but they can’t hide.
Read 4 tweets
Kingmaker - Big IF! (True) Profile picture
Nov 15, 2023
In her RICO case against Trump and others in Fulton County, Ga., DA Fani Willis asks the court to revoke bail of the only black defendant, Harrison Floyd. His crime? Tweeting about the credibility of the case and witnesses against him. documentcloud.org/documents/2416…
The DA claims that specifically listing by Twitter address certain defendants in the Tweets - Sidney Powell and Jenna Ellis- and certain witnesses, Floyd directly or indirectly communicated with them to intimidate or to discuss the facts, in violation of the conditions of release
On their face the tweets don’t seem very intimidating. What they do suggest is that Mr Floyd believes he’s been wrongly accused and that the state’s witnesses against him may not be telling the whole truth.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(