Thread by @JoshWalkos

Mega Thread: The WHO, FDA, CDC & Gardasil

While poking around The WHO website I came across a document entitled:

“Vaccine Crisis Communication Manual: A Step by Step Guidance for National Immunization Programs”

apps.who.int/iris/bitstream…

It’s essentially a communications plan for when the shit hits the fan at varying levels and how all “stakeholders” will sing the same tune in unison.

It’s a very instructive read in light of recent events you might have heard of.

Here is how they describe the guide:

“This document outlines a suggested structure and proposed contents of a Terms of Reference (TOR) for a national vaccine communication working group. Example texts for each of these elements are also provided for inspiration.”

“Establishing a national vaccine communication working group allows you to build strong working and collaboration relations with your allies, strengthen routine communication for immunization and ensure well-coordinated and immediate response from all involved authorities…

to any safety event. Use the document as a starting point for discussions and for inspiration when developing a TOR for your working group.”

Here are some screenshots of the phases of response.

These are the influencers they can harness to help with their propaganda campaign.

Sounds about right.

Also importantly they make sure to “Monitor what the media reports about the crisis. Good relations with key journalists and the media will help you in times of crisis.”

They then go on to give example scenarios and how they should communicate to the public if something similar should occur.

EXAMPLE
“An infant has died of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) within 24 hours after having been immunized at a local health centre. Preliminary evidence indicates no causal link between the death and the vaccine.”

Of course it does.

Here is an example of their communication objectives and actions with an event like SIDS. As you can see, “restoring public trust” is of utmost importance. To me this sounds like a euphemism for “restoring stakeholder profits” to me.

This next scenario I’m going to focus on what they classified as an “High Impact Crisis Event”. This scenario revolves around a “girl with a serious underlying condition has died after the HPV vaccine”

Here are some quotes from the “Crisis Response > Design Communication Response” document that caught my attention. Specifically the claims being made about the HPV vaccine that should be used as talking points to communicate to the public.

They use this as a cookie cutter template where any vaccine can be inserted and used as a talking point. Not biased or sociopathic at all. Again a young girl just died a day after the HPV vaccine.

“Our deepest sympathy goes to those affected.”

So very compassionate.

“Vaccination saves lives and prevents suffering. The risk of severe side effects is extremely small. Some mild and more frequent side effects that may occur include a light rash and fever.”

“The benefits of vaccination by far outweigh the minimal risk of a severe adverse event following immunization.”

“For example: 1 in 1 000 000 individuals vaccinated may suffer from a serious allergic reaction (anaphylaxis).”

Those are quite the odds.

“The vaccine is prequalified, which means it has been approved by WHO. Before prequalification it was rigorously tested through clinical and field procedures. After prequalification, WHO regularly inspects the production facilities to ensure compliance with good manufacturing”

“Scientific evidence shows that combined vaccines save time and money through fewer clinic visits,reduce discomfort for the child through fewer injections and increase the probability that the child will receive the complete set of vaccinations according to the national schedule”

They forgot to mention that it also throttles the immune system, making it much more likely a SAE occurs but who cares right?

“Despite high immunization coverage for [insert name of vaccine-preventable disease], (in this case cervical cancer) some children are still missing out on vaccination and thus remain at risk.”

“Our country has taken all necessary steps to avoid a future outbreak of [insert name of vaccine-preventable disease] by initiating a [insert name of vaccine-preventable disease] (HPV) vaccination catch-up campaign.”

“Multiple studies, including Phase III randomized trials, have proven the safety and effectiveness of the HPV vaccine to prevent high-risk HPV infections and subsequent carcinogenesis.”

“These studies have not shown any relation between the development of this underlying condition and the HPV vaccine.”

I found this quite peculiar as I am familiar with the controversy surrounding HPV vaccine since its release. In fact there is currently a class action lawsuit against the manufacturer Merck for side effects and misleading claims.

So the fact that the WHO boldly proclaims that the trials used for its approval have proven it “safe and effective” is included in their communications plan prompted me to investigate those claims further.

Gardasil Goes to Washington

So what of these clinical trials? For a product like Gardasil to be rolled out in multiple countries all of the world and given to one of the youngest most vulnerable populations, adolescent and teenage girls, it had to be safe right?

Here is what the CDC has to say about it.

“HPV vaccination is recommended at ages 11–12 years. HPV vaccines can be given starting at age 9 years. All preteens need HPV vaccination, so they are protected from HPV infections that can cause cancer later in life.”

•Teens and young adults through age 26 years who didn’t start or finish the HPV vaccine series also need HPV vaccination.

CDC recommends that 11- to 12-year-olds receive two doses of HPV vaccine 6 to 12 months apart.

•The first dose is routinely recommended at ages 11–12 years old. The vaccination can be started at age 9 years.
•Only two doses are needed if the first dose was given before 15th birthday.

Teens and young adults who start the series later, at ages 15 through 26 years, need three doses of HPV vaccine.

•Children aged 9 through 14 years who have received two doses of HPV vaccine less than 5 months apart will need a third dose.

•Three doses are also recommended for people aged 9 through 26 years who have weakened immune systems.

“Vaccination is not recommended for everyone older than age 26 years.”

“HPV vaccination works extremely well. HPV vaccine has the potential to prevent more than 90% of HPV-attributable cancers.”

This sounds like a miracle vaccine according to the CDC.

Safe and Effective. Definitely Safe and Effective.

cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/h…

However, Gardasil’s insert states,

“GARDASIL has not been evaluated for the potential to cause carcinogenicity or genotoxicity”. That means it’s safe and effective right?

So surely the FDA followed all safety procedures and checks and balances. Well not exactly.

The FDA approved the quadrivalent Gardasil 4 in 2006 after being fast-tracked for approval (the process only took six months). Gardasil 9 was approved in 2014.

To give you an idea of the so-called dangers of HPV it takes 15 to 30 years for infection with HPV to lead to cancer. With such a low death rate and the decades it takes for cancer to develop,..

it would take an impossibly large population of patients to reach any statistically significant result in a study to show whether Gardasil prevents cancer so let’s just get that straight.
So why did FDA fast track it and sings it’s praises so vociferously in their press release?

June 18, 2009 Press Announcement

"Today is an important day for public health and for women's health, and for our continued fight against serious life-threatening diseases like cervical cancer," said Alex Azar, Deputy Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)

"HHS is committed to advancing critical health measures such as the development of new and promising vaccines to protect and advance the health of all Americans."

web.archive.org/web/2009101908…

So critical that they were willing forgo basic scientific study protocols in order to get it on the market. Now where have I heard that before?

“According to Mary Holland, Kim Mack Rosenberg, and Eileen Iorio, co-authors of the book, The HPV Vaccine On Trial: Seeking Justice For a Generation Betrayed, “none of the participants in the [Gardasil] clinical trials received a true saline placebo,”

Which means the clinical trials failed to measure the effects of Gardasil against a true control.

Instead of receiving a placebo, clinical trial subjects were given aluminum-containing adjuvants and other chemical mixtures which masked adverse events and made Gardasil seem safer than it would have otherwise.

So every expert tasked reviewing the study design, protocols, safety etc.. completely missed this glaring breach of sound protocols and decided to approve it. These are distinguished scientists, they would never allow something like this to happen.

Yes, they would and did as unbelievable as it may seem. This instance wasn’t the first time either.

The FDA’s Vaccine and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) evaluates the safety and effectiveness of vaccines for the agency and 23 years ago they were under fire for conflicts of interest around the approval for the rotavirus vaccine.

A 2000 investigation of VRBPAC by the U.S. House of Representatives Reform Committee found,

“The overwhelming majority of members, both voting members and consultants, have substantial ties to the pharmaceutical industry”

nvic.org/law-policy-fed…

Here is an excerpt from the 2000 investigation on VRBPAC and ACIP committee’s approval of the Rotavirus vaccine that had to be taken off the market entitled: “Majority Staff Report Committee on Government Reform U.S. House of Representatives August 21, 2000”

“A thorough review of the VRBPAC’s and ACIP’s consideration of the Rotavirus vaccine found
a flawed process that led to a poor decision.”

“Committee members with financial ties to the manufacturer of the vaccine, and producers of
competing vaccines, were given waivers to participate in the decision-making process.”

•Legitimate concerns about serious side effects and a lack of information were swept aside.
•The CDC’s advisory committee (ACIP) recommended the “RotaShield” for universal use before it was even approved by the FDA.

•The end result was that a product was placed on the market that had to be withdrawn within one year because it was injuring the children it was meant to protect.”

The exact same thing that is happening today with mRNA injections.

Once a vaccine gets through FDA VRBPAC Committee and is licensed it then goes to the CDCs ACIP committee who then recommends it be added to the schedule.

A 2009 report from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Office of Inspector General stated that the “CDC had a systematic lack of oversight of the ethics program” and that 97% of CDC committee members’ conflict disclosures had omissions.

Here is the report:
oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oe…

“DHHS [U.S. Department of Health and Human Services] has a clear conflict of interest with respect to Gardasil at the institutional level since it shares directly in Gardasil’s profits.”

“We’ve also seen now that this conflict of interest is echoed by (and possibly sustains) a pervasive pattern of regulatory bias in favor of Gardasil during multiple stages of the decision process.” -Mark Blaxill, “A License to Kill? Part 3: Who Guards Gardasil’s Guardians?”

About Those HPV Trials The WHO referenced in their Crisis Document.

On July 27, 2018, the BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine published a critique of an earlier review of the HPV vaccine clinical trials.
ebm.bmj.com/content/ebmed/…

They made several observations indicating bias in how the trials were conducted. They reported:

•Regarding the reporting of clinical trial results, one third of the clinical studies were not published. In a separate 2018 study, the same authors found that nearly a third (31%) of the Gardasil and Gardasil 9 studies were not published.

This raises the question of publishing bias, the common practice of publishing only positive results and leaving negative outcomes unmentioned.

•None of the 26 HPV vaccine clinical trials included in the review used a true inactive placebo.

-The so-called placebos contained aluminum-containing adjuvants and other ingredients, biasing or negating any effort to determine the actual increased risk of adverse events caused by the vaccine, compared to a true inactive placebo.

•Many women with a history of immunological or nervous system disorders were excluded from the trials.

The authors mention a 2017 World Health Organization (WHO) study that found serious harms related to postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS).

Also complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) following HPV vaccination. They note that, as of May 2018, a WHO database contained 526 cases of POTS and 168 cases of CRPS related to HPV vaccination

The WHO, FDA & CDC Knew and people died.

nypost.com/2008/07/20/my-…

“Jessica Ericzon, 17, was "an all-American teenager," as described by one of her upstate LaFargeville teachers.  Last February, she was working on her softball pitches, getting ready for a class trip to Universal Studios in Florida and hitting the slopes to snowboard”

“Then one day, the blond, blue-eyed honors student collapsed dead in her bathroom.  It started with a pain in the back of her head. On the advice of her family doctor, Jessie had taken a series of three Gardasil shots.”

“Livingstone reported Jessie’s death to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System”

“Run by the FDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, it has collected 8,000 reports of problems after Gardasil shots, including paralysis, seizures and miscarriages.“Seventeen other deaths following the vaccine have been reported since Merck introduced it in 2006”

“Officials have confirmed 11 of the reported deaths so far, said CDC spokesman Curtis Allen.”

They have found “no pattern or connection” to Gardasil in eight deaths and are still reviewing three, he said.

Does this story sound familiar to anything going on today? This is standard operating procedure for these organizations and yet we still have 80% of the population who trust these faceless “experts” with their own lives and the lives of their families.

Global Fallout

Prior to Gardasils forced deployment globally, in the countries that used smear screening for cancer, the average annual rate of decline was 2.5% between 1989 and 2000 and 1% between 2000 and 2007, resulting in a total decrease of nearly 30% across 1989-2007.

This is what Merck would call a “market share” and pharmaceutical companies aren’t keen on sharing anything.

Since vaccination, in all the countries implemented with a large vaccination program, there is a reversal of the trend, with a significant increase in the frequency of invasive cancers in the most vaccinated groups.

In the UK Vaccination promoters expected cervical cancer rates to decrease in women aged 20 to 24 . However, in 2016, national statistics showed a sharp and significant increase in the rate of cervical cancer in this age group.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29247658/

Women between 20 and 25 years old who were vaccinated between the ages 14 and 18 which was more than 85% of that demographic at the time, have seen their cancer risk increase by 70% in 2 years (from 2.7 in 2012 to 4.6 per 100,000 in 2014.

Those aged 25 to 30, aged between 18 and 23 at the time of the vaccination campaign have seen their cancer risk increase by 100% between 2007 and 2015 from 11 in 100,000 to 22 in 100,000.

Similar increases in cancer were found in younger cohorts post vaccination campaigns in Sweden, Norway and the United States.

When looking at the trials, Merck’s own preliminary studies predicted that Gardasil would kill and injure far more Americans than the HPV Virus, prior to the introduction of the vaccine.

The average death rate in young women in the U.S. general population is 4.37 per 10,000 See Brady E. Hamilton et al., “Births: Provisional Data for 2016,” Vital Statistics Rapid Release, Report No. 002, June 2017.

cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsrr…

The Gardasil pooled group had a death rate of 8.5 per 10,000 or almost double the background rate in the U.S.

When Merck added in death from belated clinical trials, the death rate jumped to 13.3 per 10,000 (21 deaths out of 15,706).

Now let go back to one more slide from the World Health Organizations Crisis Response Document.

Two key messages were chosen to guide communication goals:

“There is a safe & effective vaccine to prevent cervical cancer” and “Every day on woman gets diagnosed with cervical cancer in country [B].”

Truly unbelievable isn’t it?

Given that one man with an internet connection, no clinical background, and only a bachelors degree was able to learn these facts about Gardasil but the entirety of the WHO and its infinite resources couldn’t should deeply disturb us all.

Is this a case of complete dereliction of duty or something worse? Either way, how they can make statements like that in good conscience is a direct reflection of their lack of one.

Knowing what you now know about Gardasil watch this brief commercial Merck put out for it and try not to put your fist through the screen in disgust.

Just this month a judge ruled that a class action lawsuit will be moving forward and will be advancing towards bellwether trials.

The lawsuit states:

“Merck obtained FDA approval for Gardasil back in 2006 based on deceptive research and clinical trials which misrepresented the efficacy of the vaccine while concealing its safety risks and side effects.“

“Merck then launched an aggressive and highly misleading marketing campaign to include millions of parents vaccinating their pre-teen daughters with Gardasil.”

lawsuit-information-center.com/amp/gardasil-h…

Just like they did with Vioxx

nature.com/articles/45032…

It’s too bad the damage has been done and any settlement will be a drop in the bucket of the profits both Merck and the NIH reaped off of the death and suffering of young women worldwide. For them it’s seems like it’s just the cost of doing business.

It is estimated that Vioxx killed 40,000 people in the United States alone. To give you a comparison, its estimated that 58,000 American died in the Vietnam war and Merck didn’t even fire one shot.

theglobeandmail.com/life/vioxx-too…

Unless you count their marketing campaign, knowingly targeting Americans with false advertising as a shot.

Merck Vioxx 2002 Commercial

If you enjoyed this thread please consider giving me a follow. As always thank you for the support and stayed tuned.

👇

https://twitter.com/joshwalkos/status/1614403299356147712

If you or someone you know has experienced an adverse event and you’re comfortable with sharing the story, please share below, it will add tremendous value to the thread.

Comment & Share Your Story ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️