Bayt al-Fann consistently takes the art, imagery, scholarship and narrative voices of others, and uses them without permission or acknowledgment - both here and on their website. They've built a 100k following on Twitter alone.
A textbook case of cultural appropriation.
There have been vague assurances that this sort of thing won't keep happening. And it continues.
Does anyone even know who they are? Their website says nothing about who runs Bayt al-Fann. Their operation is clearly well-organized and disciplined.
And unethical.
"God commands you to return things entrusted to you to their owners" (4:58)
"Whoever is not thankful to people, is not thankful to Allah" (Tirmidhi)
مَنْ لاَ يَشْكُرِ النَّاسَ لاَ يَشْكُرِ اللَّهَ
It's all really perverse. Think how many Pakistani / diaspora readers were thrilled to see the eloquent thread on #Qawwali -- beaming with pride as Bayt al-Fann spoon-fed them their own stolen scholarship.
Bayt al-Fann has still not removed its plagiarized 'Muslim kung fu' thread.
It's been a week since the real author asked them to remove the content they copied without permission (and without acknowledgement when they first posted it).
I forgot to mention that Bayt al-Fann's Qawwali thread also plagiarizes this article from 2021, in addition to copying from Ziauddin Sardar's work. ipassio.com/blog/qawwali-m…
Do you know how hard it is to turn deep expertise into engaging prose? Have you ever spent hours tracking down a source for a footnote? Distilled years of experience into a story? It takes hard, tedious work to craft the content that you are copying.
Another problem with plagiarizing others' work: readers have no way to tell when unreliable info is being regurgitated to them. In the case, Bayt al-Fann's plagiarism of a sketchy blog post introduced errors and nonsense into their #Qawwali thread.
I have nothing against accounts that curate content - if they do it ethically. Doesn't @BaytAlFann realize that people would love to see them uplifting others' work? And many artists / writers would have happily let them (properly) quote or cite their content. This is so needless
I've learned (from @bahathmag - follow them) that Bayt al-Fann's thread on Chinese Arabic calligraphy used their work: bahath.co/calligraphy
The BaF thread was posted & widely seen on Dec 16. They added an end-tweet giving credit on Jan 11 - after being asked
Some clarity on who / what Bayt al-Fann is. Unfortunately they are professionally trained in curation and citation best practices, and absolutely know better.
1. I'll never support Bayt al-Fann after this. The whole thing is theft. Knowingly done. Rotten.
2. Let's support legit Islamic art & arch. curation projects. Like a REAL artist collective -- not just one person + their friend/sibling stealing content for their LLC.
The rice thread is also plagiarized. Here they copy from a larger number of sources than in many other threads.
You can see why so many of their posts include wrong info. They copy randomly wikipedia, random blogs etc. No source standards, just vibes.
2/ I could never figure out Bayt al-Fann. They're an artist collective? But their tweeting felt like the work of a business: prolific posting, consistent quality, prompt "thank you 🙏❤️" replies and, in the early days, templated DMs inviting [your name] to view the latest thread.
3/ Bayt al-Fann's About page says they are:
"Arabic for Art House"
"a global home for artists, creatives and communities"
"a house for everyone"
I figured they were probably just shy?
[image: a Bayt al-Fann DM from Jan 18, 2022 inviting me to share one of their early threads]
I think if more people could read fiqh texts, fewer people would care what those texts have to say.
Sometimes I wonder what people imagine is in these books. Do they think they will find a reassuring explanation for the troubling things they’ve heard quoted from scholars? I’m so sorry.
There are moments that sparkle. But they are rare. Maybe after several years of extensive reading you can piece together something beautiful. But mostly you will be confused, bored, or deeply let down.
Please stop describing hitting a wife as "discipline.”
Call it what it literally is. Accuracy matters a lot here, and “discipline” is irresponsibly vague.
A thread. 🧵
By using words like “discipline” to refer to hitting wives, we obscure the meaning of fiqh texts and invite readers to speculate about the meaning of something that should actually be quite clear. We may also be normalizing violence against women.
2/
Some people say: “This is silly — jurists themselves use the word “discipline” (taʾdīb) to describe hitting a wife (i.e. to punish her for refusing sex, leaving home without permission, etc.)! How can you object to historians using this as a description?”
3/