Colin Grabow Profile picture
Jan 17 11 tweets 3 min read
One of the least enjoyable aspects of working is the process of actually getting to work—and government policies are making it worse.

The country can do better, and changes to public policy—including trade policy—can help.

A #NewWorker 🧵
Nearly 85% of Americans drive a car, truck, or some other vehicle to work and back.

Millions more commute using mass transit systems that are unnecessarily costly, slow (average one-way bus commute time: 46.6 minutes), or unreliable.
The average price of a new auto last year reached over $47K. Used car prices now avg over $27K.

Tariffs are partly to blame. Typically around 2.5%, they can spike as high as 25% for light trucks.

Tariffs on steel used to make cars & items like tires further increase costs.
Other government policies drive up costs as well.

Most states, for example, prohibit auto manufacturers from selling directly to consumers and impose other restrictions to spare dealerships from competition.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_US_…
American commuters also pay more in less direct ways—such as time spent in traffic.

One reason for long commutes is zoning restrictions that limit housing development.

Such laws drive up prices, push development outwards, and separate workers from their places of employment.
Commutes are also lengthened by infrastructure that is overconsumed due to a lack of pricing.

One way to ensure traffic flows smoothly is dynamic tolling that adjusts prices to reflect demand.

One example of this can be found on I-66.

ride66express.com
Infrastructure may also be insufficient due to laws that delay new roads being built.

Protectionist Buy America laws make infrastructure projects unnecessarily costly by requiring the use of U.S. construction materials.
Costs are also increased by the Davis-Bacon Act that mandates “prevailing wages” be paid on infrastructure projects.

The National Environmental Policy Act, meanwhile, requires environment impact statements that can delay projects for years.
Protectionism also increases the cost of capital equipment.

Light rail and buses purchased with federal dollars must be assembled in the US and have at least 70% of their cost manufactured domestically.

This makes the modernization and expansion of mass transit more expensive.
Protectionist laws also require ferries used by some workers in their commutes to be U.S.-built.

That adds significant costs to the purchase of new ferries and helps explain the use of vessels long past their prime.

cato.org/blog/us-ferry-…
These are just some of the many laws that can be repealed or reformed to better meet the transportation needs of U.S. workers.

See more in my chapter in “Empowering the New American Worker: Market‐based Solutions for Today’s Workforce” (#NewWorker).

cato.org/empowering-new…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Colin Grabow

Colin Grabow Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @cpgrabow

Jan 17
Hard to imagine: "[@AlaskaDOTPF Spokesperson Sam Dapcevich] says the 60-year-old Matanuska has a fair amount of what’s called 'wasted steel.'"
Ruh-roh: "In the meantime, Southeast Alaska and Prince William Sound communities will be mostly served by ships built in the 1970s...There’s no long range plan or state savings to replace the aging fleet."

alaskapublic.org/2021/02/01/ala…
Meanwhile, @BCFerries has added ten new ferries with capacities ranging from 399-600 passengers and crew since 2016. That Canada allows ferries to be purchased from overseas makes @bcferries' fleet modernization a significantly less costly proposition. remontowa-rsb.pl/en/aktualnosci…
Read 4 tweets
Jan 3
I recently came across @ChuckGrassley's remarks at a 1993 hearing on cargo preference (laws mandating the use of expensive U.S. commercial ships for government-impelled cargo). They are full of thermonuclear truth bombs regarding U.S. maritime policy: drive.google.com/file/d/15_KGLO…
When critics point out the flaws of cargo preference or the Jones Act, defenders of the status quo typically counter that such measures are necessary to provide ships and mariners for military sealift. Grassley dismantles this line of argument.
"It is like the $400 hammers and $1800 toilet seats. @DeptofDefense may need toilet seats...but they don't need to spend $1800 for them. Mr. Chairman, the question for @DeptofDefense is: 'Are there less costly, more effective ways of securing sealift?'"
Read 10 tweets
Dec 29, 2022
President Biden is currently vacationing in the U.S. Virgin Islands, which is exempt from the Jones Act. Seems like a good time to dig into the USVI's history with this protectionist maritime law.
Originally a Danish territory, the United States had made attempts to acquire the Virgin Islands since 1867. But during World War I these efforts took on a new urgency due to fears Germany could conquer Denmark and use the islands as a naval base. 2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/ho/time/w…
A treaty to transfer the islands was reached between the U.S. and Denmark on August 4, 1916, ratifications exchanged on January 17, 1917, and formal transfer made on March 31, 1917. In exchange for ceding the islands, the U.S. paid Denmark $25 million. doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/…
Read 27 tweets
Dec 28, 2022
Today @algore is perhaps best known for his environmental activism. But in 1993 one of his top goals was improving public sector efficiency as head of an interagency task force called the National Performance Review. Among targets identified by the group: U.S. maritime policy.
From the task force's draft report: "What is left of the U.S. maritime industry stands as a stark reminder of how protectionist, economic regulatory policies by our government literally razed the economic underpinnings of our once mighty and proud merchant marine fleet."
Read 10 tweets
Dec 6, 2022
The Jones Act is Section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act of 1920. In his 1938 book "American Shipping Policy" (amazon.com/American-Shipp……) Paul M. Zeis explains the Merchant Marine Act's origins and how it was passed: ImageImage
Zeis essentially makes two noteworthy claims here:

1. The MMA was written by the Senate Commerce Committee (under the chairmanship of Sen. Wesley Jones) and shipping lobbyists.
2. Few in Congress knew what was in the bill when it came up for a vote.
The influence of the Senate Commerce Committee and Sen. Jones is not much in dispute. After all, that's why the MMA in the years following its passage was called the Jones Act (later the term became more associated only with the cabotage provisions in Section 27).
Read 13 tweets
Nov 8, 2022
A lack of Jones Act-compliant tankers means 🇺🇸 LNG can be sent to China but not New England or Puerto Rico. Some may think the solution is building and subsidizing the operation of U.S. LNG tankers. But that’s a road the country has been down before, and it didn’t end well. 🧵
From 1977-1980 16 LNG tankers were built in three different U.S. shipyards, with 11 of the ships lavished with hundreds of millions of dollars in subsidies. shipbuildinghistory.com/shipssincewwii…
drive.google.com/file/d/1y3-5Ji… ImageImage
Three of the tankers were built by the Avondale, LA shipyard (now closed). It was a disaster. To save money Avondale did not seek the assistance of foreign shipyards experienced in constructing this type of vessel. sanjuanco.com/DocumentCenter… Image
Read 24 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(