Nearly 85% of Americans drive a car, truck, or some other vehicle to work and back.
Millions more commute using mass transit systems that are unnecessarily costly, slow (average one-way bus commute time: 46.6 minutes), or unreliable.
The average price of a new auto last year reached over $47K. Used car prices now avg over $27K.
Tariffs are partly to blame. Typically around 2.5%, they can spike as high as 25% for light trucks.
Tariffs on steel used to make cars & items like tires further increase costs.
Other government policies drive up costs as well.
Most states, for example, prohibit auto manufacturers from selling directly to consumers and impose other restrictions to spare dealerships from competition.
Ruh-roh: "In the meantime, Southeast Alaska and Prince William Sound communities will be mostly served by ships built in the 1970s...There’s no long range plan or state savings to replace the aging fleet."
Meanwhile, @BCFerries has added ten new ferries with capacities ranging from 399-600 passengers and crew since 2016. That Canada allows ferries to be purchased from overseas makes @bcferries' fleet modernization a significantly less costly proposition. remontowa-rsb.pl/en/aktualnosci…
I recently came across @ChuckGrassley's remarks at a 1993 hearing on cargo preference (laws mandating the use of expensive U.S. commercial ships for government-impelled cargo). They are full of thermonuclear truth bombs regarding U.S. maritime policy: drive.google.com/file/d/15_KGLO…
When critics point out the flaws of cargo preference or the Jones Act, defenders of the status quo typically counter that such measures are necessary to provide ships and mariners for military sealift. Grassley dismantles this line of argument.
"It is like the $400 hammers and $1800 toilet seats. @DeptofDefense may need toilet seats...but they don't need to spend $1800 for them. Mr. Chairman, the question for @DeptofDefense is: 'Are there less costly, more effective ways of securing sealift?'"
President Biden is currently vacationing in the U.S. Virgin Islands, which is exempt from the Jones Act. Seems like a good time to dig into the USVI's history with this protectionist maritime law.
Originally a Danish territory, the United States had made attempts to acquire the Virgin Islands since 1867. But during World War I these efforts took on a new urgency due to fears Germany could conquer Denmark and use the islands as a naval base. 2001-2009.state.gov/r/pa/ho/time/w…
A treaty to transfer the islands was reached between the U.S. and Denmark on August 4, 1916, ratifications exchanged on January 17, 1917, and formal transfer made on March 31, 1917. In exchange for ceding the islands, the U.S. paid Denmark $25 million. doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/…
Today @algore is perhaps best known for his environmental activism. But in 1993 one of his top goals was improving public sector efficiency as head of an interagency task force called the National Performance Review. Among targets identified by the group: U.S. maritime policy.
From the task force's draft report: "What is left of the U.S. maritime industry stands as a stark reminder of how protectionist, economic regulatory policies by our government literally razed the economic underpinnings of our once mighty and proud merchant marine fleet."
The Jones Act is Section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act of 1920. In his 1938 book "American Shipping Policy" (amazon.com/American-Shipp……) Paul M. Zeis explains the Merchant Marine Act's origins and how it was passed:
Zeis essentially makes two noteworthy claims here:
1. The MMA was written by the Senate Commerce Committee (under the chairmanship of Sen. Wesley Jones) and shipping lobbyists. 2. Few in Congress knew what was in the bill when it came up for a vote.
The influence of the Senate Commerce Committee and Sen. Jones is not much in dispute. After all, that's why the MMA in the years following its passage was called the Jones Act (later the term became more associated only with the cabotage provisions in Section 27).
A lack of Jones Act-compliant tankers means 🇺🇸 LNG can be sent to China but not New England or Puerto Rico. Some may think the solution is building and subsidizing the operation of U.S. LNG tankers. But that’s a road the country has been down before, and it didn’t end well. 🧵
Three of the tankers were built by the Avondale, LA shipyard (now closed). It was a disaster. To save money Avondale did not seek the assistance of foreign shipyards experienced in constructing this type of vessel. sanjuanco.com/DocumentCenter…