Before Captain Cook landed, the populous Native Hawaiians were entirely self-sufficient and produced more food using less land than modern Hawaiian agriculture.
Here is a quick tour.
Native Hawaiians developed the ahupua'a system, a geographic unit used to delineate a specific land management and food production area.
Each ahupua'a started as a narrow point high in the the volcanic peaks, spreading wider like a slice of pie as it descended towards the sea.
A single ahupua'a spanned a cross-section of the island’s ecosystems and resources.
The ahupua'a was organized around the flow of water. Boundaries ran along the natural delineation of watersheds. From the top of the system to the bottom, water was treated with the utmost care.
The upper forests were mostly untouched, with a small portion lightly managed and used to produce hardwoods and building materials
Below this area, Native Hawaiians planted agroforestry plots mixing endemic plants with the canoe plants brought by the first Polynesians
Breadfruit trees and coconut trees shaded bananas and noni trees, and sprinkled throughout the agroforest were Kukui trees. Chickens and pigs ate the fallen fruits.
This served as the Hawaiians' perennial source of starches, fats, protein, and medicinals.
In the zone below the agroforestry, Hawaiians grew their most important staple and culturally significant crop: taro
This zone was terraced and irrigated with water from the mountain streams. Water was diverted into the terraced pools, gently spilling from one to the next
Excess water would return to the stream, where it continued towards the sea.
The freshwater would eventually meet the sea and spill into rock-walled fish ponds in the tidal pools. Fish were captured with sluice gates and fattened up in the nutrient-rich brackish water
A recent study concluded that the ahupua'a system could produce 1 million metric tons of food from just 6 percent of Hawaii's land.
That's enough to feed all of the estimated 1.2 million pre-contact Native Hawaiians, or 86% of the current population of Hawaii, 1.4 million.
In contrast, Hawaii's current farmland covers 3x more land than before 1777, and the total food produced through modern methods is only 151,700 metric tons
That's only 15% of what was produced more than 200 years ago by Native Hawaiians on 3x less land without external inputs
The ahuapua'a system was first conceived around the 15th century. It was successfully used for more than 1,000 years to produce a cornucopia of foods, maximize and sustain precious water resources, preserve a rich ecology, and support a vibrant culture.
Today, we go straight for the shiny technological fix; we've lost track of the whole and focus too much on the individual pieces, resulting in fragile agriculture systems
The ahuapa'a is an example of the kind of agricultural ingenuity that is possible in each unique bio-region
The second to last tweet should read: The ahuapua'a system is believed to have been conceived in the 15 century. However, some evidence shows that it was successfully used for over 1,000 years.
Thanks to all who pointed out my math deficiency. I also mix up my colors.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Syntropic farming systems (SFS) achieve the same total productivity and income as conventional farming on only 10% of the land area.
SFS have a land-equivalent ratios of 2.8-4.1, meaning that 1 hectare of SFS produces the same yield as 2.8-4.1 hectares of monoculture. 🧵
This is an extraordinary example of overyielding in complex agroecosystems.
Overyielding occurs when a polyculture (multiple crops grown together) produces higher yields than equal areas of the same crops grown separately.
Other remarkable benefits of syntropic farming systems:
– Carbon sequestration potential is impressive, with one Brazilian study documenting an average annual increase of 3.9 Mg carbon/hectare in SFS
– Disease incidence can be dramatically lower (30.4% in SFS vs. 96.4% in monocultures for cocoa)
– SFS contribute significant nutrients through leaf litter (100 kg nitrogen/hectare, 5 kg phosphorous/hectare, and 10 kg potassium/hectare annually in one system)
– Tree survival rates reach 90-100% in SFS versus 70% in conventional agroforestry
– SFS maintain more favorable microclimates with lower temperature fluctuations and higher soil water content
The weather patterns that coffee farmers relied on for generations are breaking down.
While global climate change takes the blame, in reality it’s largely a self inflicted cycle of ecological degradation resulting from farming practices.
A look at the problem and solutions: 🧵
The numbers tell a sobering story:
37% of the world’s coffee grows on former forest land. The industry has cleared over 2.5 million hectares—nearly four times the size of Delaware.
For every cup of coffee consumed, approximately one square inch of forest was converted to production.
Each year, about 130,000 hectares of forest disappear for new coffee plantations.
A new study claims grass-fed beef is as carbon-intensive as industrial beef.
This conclusion relies on a narrow, linear analysis that misses the complex ecological reality of grazing systems.
Here's why this claim is wrong:
Well-managed grazing dramatically enhances biodiversity, builds healthy, resilient soils, supports water cycles, and contributes to carbon storage both below and above ground.
These critical ecological functions are largely overlooked in the study's limited analysis.
Grazing cattle create a complete nutrient cycle—improving soil biology, enhancing water infiltration, and distributing nutrients through manure.
This natural system replaces synthetic inputs (major emission sources) and delivers ecological benefits the study entirely overlooks
Our taste buds and sense of smell evolved to decode the chemical language of plants.
The compounds that create flavor in whole foods are often the exact same molecules that benefit our health, a fundamental relationship that modern food processing has profoundly disrupted. 🧵
The human nose can distinguish trillions of different smells with just 400 types of scent receptors working in combination.
This system evolved specifically to help us evaluate which plants were nutritious and which might be toxic.
Take the compound lycopene in tomatoes: it contributes to their rich umami flavor while simultaneously protecting cells from oxidative damage and supporting cardiovascular health.
This dual purpose of plant compounds is consistent across many foods.
History often frames the Irish Potato Famine as a simple crop failure story. A closer look tells a different tale:
Ireland maintained net food exports while 1 million starved—showing how institutional architecture, not technological limitation, created catastrophe... 🧵
Ireland wasn't technologically backward during the famine years.
It existed right alongside England during the British Agricultural Revolution, a time when crop rotation boosted farm yields by 50% and selective breeding dramatically improved livestock productivity.
At the time approximately 10,000 landowners controlled 95% of arable land, predominantly as absentee owners, establishing extractive dynamics where agricultural surplus flowed outward rather than reinvested locally.