Did you know? Childhood vaccine trials are purposely designed to obscure the true incidence of adverse events of the vaccine being tested.
A new pediatric vaccine is never tested during its formal approval process against a neutral solution (saline)placebo. Think about that one.
Then, when the “next generation” vaccine comes along, its pre-licensing clinical trials will always compare the new vaccine to the current vaccine and never to a placebo. By doing this they can never ensure that the true rate of AE’s are never known. They think we’re idiots.
Imagine that, instead of triple blinding the trial & the control group receiving a saline placebo to test against the old generation and new generation, they simply use another vaccine in the control group. This will cause AE’s and muddy the data comparatively.
For example and you can look this up. The package insert for Glaxo-Smith-Kline’s (GSK) hepatitis A vaccine (Havrix) reads:
“Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a vaccine cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another vaccine, and may not reflect the rates observed in practice.”
Well that’s reassuring, I definitely want to plunge a needle into my child’s arm now.
This is just the beginning. I’m going to provide more shocking facts that before would get me banned immediately. It’s sad you have to get informed consent from someone on twitter isn’t it?
This is RCT 101. You can’t have a bio active placebo in the control group if you are testing the safety of a product. The only explanation for this is to ensure AE’s occur in both groups so that the true amount of AE’s are “plausibly”concealed. This is good enough for the FDA.
Pfizer unblinded their trials.
“The Vaccine Transition Option offers all participants 12 years & older the choice to learn whether they received the study vaccine or placebo, & for those who received the placebo,to have the option to receive the study vaccine”
How the Vaccine Transition Option works:
•If you choose the Vaccine Transition Option, your study site will schedule a time for you to be unblinded (that is, learn whether you were in the study vaccine or placebo group) in the coming weeks.
•If you find out that you were in the placebo group and would like to receive the study vaccine, you will have an in-person visit where you will be provided with a new informed consent document that the study doctor will review with you and your parent or guardian before signing
Then, you will receive your first dose of the study vaccine.
•You will receive a second dose of the study vaccine about 21 days later and follow an updated study schedule that includes follow-up and illness visits.
How can the data be reliable if they unblinded participants?
Looks like the clowns 🤡 in or associated with the 77th PsyOp brigade have been alerted to someone being truthful about vaccines. You’ll notice them by there lack of evidence and shit attitudes.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Is a true saline placebo used w/ the 💉’s on the childhood schedule?
All evidence I’ve provided is directly from the manufacturers insert or safety reports. This is not my opinion so take it up with FDA & Pharma if you’re mad.
Kinrix
(Diphtheria-Tetanus-Acellular Pertussis-Polio) - In the only trial specifically described in the package insert the control group received the Infanrix and polio vaccines. The package insert doesn’t mention any trial involving a placebo control group.
It’s essentially a communications plan for when the shit hits the fan at varying levels and how all “stakeholders” will sing the same tune in unison.
It’s a very instructive read in light of recent events you might have heard of.
Here is how they describe the guide:
“This document outlines a suggested structure and proposed contents of a Terms of Reference (TOR) for a national vaccine communication working group. Example texts for each of these elements are also provided for inspiration.”
We have been told that to date 1.1 Million people have died in the United States from the disease COVID-19 since the start of the pandemic.
We have also seen some disturbing excess death numbers coming in over the last 2 years that seem to suggest something other than covid may also be causing deaths.
I’ve used the well known site OurWorldInData.org for excess death/daily covid death data and the death statistics at the end are pulled directly from the “Group Life COVID-19 Mortality Survey Report.
Thread: Autopsy Results Following COVID-19 Vaccines
I am going to go through a couple studies of postmortem investigations that have been conducted following the COVID-19 Vaccines.
Given that we are more than 2 years post vaccine roll out you would think there would be a more robust literature in this regard but unfortunately at this point, that is not the case.
As they say, you cannot find what you are not looking for. Thankfully there are some responsible researchers who realized the utmost importance of conducting autopsies on the deceased to see if the “vaccines” could be the cause.
Findings are entirely unsurprising if you’ve been paying attention.
“Our study has several strengths. This is the largest study of a population of more than 25 million elderly persons who are vulnerable to COVID-19 infections and complications- including residents of long-term care facilities.“