I often come back to this 🧵 on how humans react to realizing they were conned. It’s so humiliating that it’s described as a form of social death. So what’s next?
“The mark can simply deny the con… saves their pride & cheats social death but allows the con to continue unchecked”
Remember the heartbreaking videos of unvaccinated individuals in the ICU denying they had covid? I don’t think we should expect many of the individuals that were misled into believing covid is no longer a threat to their health or to their loved ones to react any differently…
To clarify, I don’t expect to see anything as extreme as those ICU videos. The denial I expect we’ll see (and I’m already seeing it) is many individuals denying that their post covid health issues or those of their loved ones are in any way related to the virus.
In other words, for those who think increasing instances of FAFO will change our course, I’m not so sure.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
German Minister of Health Karl Lauterbach: “It is worrying what we observe in people who have had several corona infections. Studies now show very clearly that those affected often have to deal with an incurable immune deficiency”
"This can be a risk factor for the development of chronic diseases, from cardiovascular problems to dementia," stressed the minister. "As I said, this is not yet certain, intensive research is being carried out. I follow the studies and discuss with experts.”
“This shows that if someone has a strongly aged immune system after two infections, it is advisable to avoid further Covid infections," said Lauterbach.
There’s a really strange argument spreading out there that the RSV and influenza epidemics going up and then down like epidemics do is irrefutable evidence of no post-covid immune system damage. Huh? Can anyone point me to the science that makes that argument make any sense?
By what mechanism would the epidemics not come down? Are they suggesting that immunocompromised patients can catch the same virus (like flu or RSV) every week over and over indefinitely without ever having a temporary period of post-infx immunity? Because that’s grade A nonsense.
It’s so nonsensical that there’s just no way that anyone making this argument actually believes it. No way.
Oh look, the wealthy and powerful are using all the SARS2 protections the ‘doomers’ have advocated for for 3 years while being aggressively characterized as a fringe group and increasingly marginalized by the decider class. Sure doesn’t look like they think covid is just a cold.
If this was a group of lowly ‘holdouts’ there would be an angry chorus of: “The pandemic is over. Give it up. The rest of the world has moved on. Stop with the fear mongering.”
So do you see now that the “covid is over/ it’s not dangerous anymore” messaging is legit propaganda?
Just look at this document! 🤯 www3.weforum.org/docs/AM23_Heal…
-Mandatory PCR on arrival
-Free rapid tests
-Free surgical/FFP2 masks throughout the venue
-Asked to rapid test if not feeling well
-New “state of the art ventilation systems” installed
+ those HEPA purifiers in every corner
Listening to the radio and it’s clear that Quebecers have no idea how this “privately run, publicly paid” idea would actually work. Neither do I. How would this utopia of super efficient, privately run RAMQ facilities that are totally free to patients actually work @cdube_sante?
A private company running a healthcare business has one goal which is to be profitable. Revenue has to be higher than expenses. The only source of revenue in a publicly funded clinic is the visit/procedure codes billed by MDs to the RAMQ. That’s it. Everything else is an expense.
If it was truly a publicly funded RAMQ facility then the only way to increase revenue is to have the MDs bill more codes to the RAMQ per day (the owners take a cut by charging rent to the MDs)… so subpar conveyer belt medicine that they’re selling to the masses as “efficiency” ?
I am regularly reminded on this app that many people, even scientists and MDs, have no idea what dermatologists do or what we know. Immunodeficiency, immune dysregulation, opportunistic infections… all of that falls within dermatologists’ expertise.
For example, skin findings are prominent in primary immunodeficiency syndromes. So understanding, recognizing and diagnosing PIDs is part of our training. Derms are often the ones to first pick up on and suggest the possibility of an underlying PID. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.111…
We also care for many categories of immunosuppressed patients. Many that we ourselves render immunosuppressed with meds to treat autoimmune and inflammatory/immune-mediated skin disorders. Think lupus, dermatomyositis, bullous pemphigoid, pemphigus vulgaris, psoriasis, etc etc
The false belief that just won’t die from those using AIDS as a mental model is that immunodeficiency = opportunistic infections. It’s not true. Most immunodeficiency syndromes will usually present with any one of these👇🏻 signs (ie freq common infections): aacijournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.11…
If widespread covid infections were causing immunodeficiency in the population, we would see things like an increased incidence of common upper respiratory tract infections, increased antibiotic use, increased incidence of pneumonia and more hospitalizations to treat infections.
Another potential sign of widespread immune dysregulation in the population would be an increased incidence of heart attacks and strokes, not just during the acute phase of the infection but also in the months following infection.