Michael Pettis Profile picture
Jan 20, 2023 19 tweets 4 min read Read on X
1/15
Since the 1960s few arguments in international finance have been as exciting as "the coming demise of the dollar", but these arguments seem always to founder on the same set of mistakes.

ft.com/content/3e05b4…
2/15
That is why it is hard to find anyone who specializes in international financial flows, and who is fully familiar with the mechanisms and history of the global balance of payments, making this argument.

centralbanking.com/central-banks/…
3/15
Pozsar argues, for example, that countries like China are running their biggest surpluses ever (true) but are recycling less and less of these surpluses into dollars (not true) and more into geopolitical investments such as funding the BRI and other developing countries.
4/15
In fact for all the over-excited talk of China's debt-trap diplomacy, China's developing countries lending peaked in 2015-16 when it learned, thanks in large part to Venezuela, just how risky this kind of lending can be, and has since then reduced flows substantially.
5/15
He also discusses the PBoC's digital currency as a major indicator of this change, but here too he is very mistaken. Anyone who lives in China knows that for all practical purposes money was digitalized years ago. No one except the very elderly carries cash.
6/15
And yet no one uses China's digital payment system abroad simply because Beijing refuses to give up control of its capital account (and with it, inevitably, its trade account). Digital currency won't change that.
7/15
The irony is that while Pozsar correctly notes that China's trade surplus is bigger than ever, he doesn't realize that this makes China even more dependent, and not less dependent, on the willingness of China and the rest of the world to hold dollars.
8/15
The key to global currency "domination" is not how excited the political elite say they are about having their currency dominate. It is how willing they are to allow clear and transparent foreign ownership of domestic assets and, even more importantly, how...
9/15
...willing and able they are to give up control of their capital and trade accounts. Beijing has made it clear it wants none of those things, and while I think they are right to reject these, it also means that the RMB cannot really act as a major international currency.
10/15
So can we at least agree that China is reducing the dollar component of its reserves? Even that is questionable. China's reserve accumulation since 2017 has occurred indirectly, through state-bank purchases of dollars. Without knowing the precise currency composition ...
11/15
...of these assets, we have no idea whether or not the amount of dollars China is holding has increased or decreased, but simple B-o-P arithmetic tells us that China's rising accumulation of foreign assets was mostly matched by rising foreign accumulation of US assets.
12/15
Poszar argues that the US is about to lose its "exorbitant privilege" to countries like China. He is wrong on two counts. First, the US does not benefit from the dollar's global role. Wall Street, owners of movable capital and the foreign affairs establishment do benefit.
13/15
But their exorbitant privilege comes at an exorbitant burden for American farmers, workers and producers. The dollar's global role is simply the obverse of its role of absorber of last resort of excess savings, mainly through soaring debt.

foreignpolicy.com/2011/09/07/an-…
14/15
Second, and related, is that this why conditions won't change until Washington itself takes much-needed steps to reduce the global role of the dollar. Pozsar argues countries like China, Russia and Saudi Arabia want to lead the way to a world less dependent on the dollar.
14/15
In fact those countries really want a world in which they can maintain the very high trade surpluses that boost domestic growth and especially benefit the exporting elites within their domestic economies.

elgaronline.com/view/journals/…
15/15
That means that what they require above all is someone to run the correspondent deficits. As long as the US, and only the US, is willing and able to play this role (not for much longer, I hope), the dollar will dominate the world of international trade and capital.
A friend just reminded me that I published this piece nearly a year ago.

carnegieendowment.org/chinafinancial…
1/2
An article in today's Reuters confirms one of the points that I make in this thread: "Commitments made to 100 developing nations by China EximBank and the China Development Bank have fallen every year since hitting a record in 2016 as the lenders...
2/2
...scaled back financing even before the COVID-19 pandemic hit in 2020."

reuters.com/markets/asia/c…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Pettis

Michael Pettis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @michaelxpettis

Feb 4
1/8
Jason Furman: "A weaker dollar may improve the economy’s long-run balance, but it does so by forcing Americans to cut back on spending. That is like telling children to eat more spinach today so they will be healthier in the future."
nytimes.com/2026/02/03/opi…
2/8
Furman is right. Currency appreciation reduces consumption costs in the short term by making imports cheaper, but in a hyperglobalized world, it also undermines domestic manufacturers by making them less competitive against foreign manufacturers.
3/8
Academic economists (mainly in the US) will argue that this is a good thing because the goal should be to maximize consumption, but the only sustainable way to maximize consumption over the longer term is to maximize production.
ft.com/content/89110b…
Read 8 tweets
Feb 3
1/4
Yicai: "China's macro leverage ratio – a measure of total debt relative to nominal GDP – rose by 11.8 percentage points to 302.3 percent in 2025, exceeding the 10.1 point increase recorded in 2024, according to a new research report by CASS.
yicaiglobal.com/news/chinas-de…
2/4
There is a lot of disagreement about the real debt-to-GDP ratio in China, especially given the difficulty of counting hidden debt, along with an "abnormal" rise in payables and receivables that reflects inability to pay debt more than it reflects rising revenues.
3/4
If we use the official total social finance number as the measure of debt, the ratio is 315%. The BIS and other entities show even higher ratios. But whatever the real number, it is among the highest in the world, perhaps exceeded only by Japan among major economies.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 2
1/7
SCMP: "Chinese scholars have called for greater urgency in reducing reliance on US dollar assets, particularly after Washington and its allies froze about US$300 billion in Russian foreign exchange reserves in 2022."
scmp.com/economy/global…
2/7
Although this may be a favorite new topic among academics – and not just Chinese academics - few seem to understand that a country cannot restructure global capital flows without also restructuring global...
3/7
trade flows, nor that a country cannot change its external imbalances without either changing its internal imbalances or changing the external imbalances (and thus the internal imbalances) of its trade partners.
Read 7 tweets
Jan 22
1/12
This talk about Europe's ability to wield its holdings of US Treasuries as a political tool is as divorced from reality as the talk about China's ability to wield its holdings of US Treasuries as a political tool.
via @ftft.com/content/7d6436…
2/12
For all the huffing and puffing, Chinese holdings of US assets actually increased. This shouldn't have been a surprise. If you run massive trade surpluses, you have no choice but to acquire foreign assets, and if you won't acquire the alternatives, you must buy US assets.
3/12
These analysts seem to forget that you cannot change your capital account without also changing your trade account, and that you cannot change your external imbalances without also changing your internal imbalances.
Read 12 tweets
Jan 21
1/7
EU commissioner for trade Maroš Šefčovič is absolutely right to question the usefulness of the WTO: "If the WTO is to meet today’s challenges, its rules must be fair and deliver balanced, legitimate outcomes. Currently, they do neither."
ft.com/content/2ff1d4…
2/7
The fact that decades of the largest, persistent trade imbalances in history have largely been WTO compliant suggests strongly that the WTO is more about maintaining legal fictions than it is about discouraging the adverse impact of trade intervention on the global economy.
3/7
As Keynes (and many others) pointed out nearly a century ago, evidence that a country is intervening in trade shows up very clearly in the form of persistent, beggar-thy-neighbor trade surpluses. If the latter exists, then the former exists.
Read 7 tweets
Jan 21
1/6
Reuters: "Chinese leaders have pledged to "significantly" lift household consumption’s share of the economy over the next five years, but have not given a specific target."
reuters.com/world/asia-pac…
2/6
If we assume that Beijing hopes to raise the consumption share of GDP by 3-5 percentage points (roughly a third of what it would need to be a more "normal" low-consuming economy), consumption would have to grow by 1-2 percentage points faster than GDP over the period.
3/6
That's a pretty big gap, and one we have never yet seen in the past 3-4 decades of Chinese growth. The good way to manage this, of course, would be for consumption growth to accelerate, although it is not at all clear what would cause that acceleration.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(