.@SocDoneLeft, supposedly an Ukraine supporter, obviously hasn't being reading up on Azov, blindly believing Kremlin propaganda. He went as far as to wish for their deaths.
Let me clear this somehow still very controversial topic up for all you uninformed people: 🧵
When russia started it's war in the Donbas in 2014 the ukrainian army wasn't well prepared for combat, so a lot of volunteer battalions were formed in order to deter the agressor. Azov consisted mostly of volunteers from the football fan community in the very beginning.
YES, some members, even founding members had a far right background, not even gonna deny that, but amongst the early members were also Jews (among them atleast one Israeli citizen), Greeks, Tatars AND even russian citizens and Pro-russians(!!).
Now, you might be wondering how Pro-russian people made their way in. Well, one of the reasons was the very loose screening process, which allowed literally anybody to join. The unit was very unorganized in these early stages, where nearly all of the controversy originates from.
Fact: without such volunteer battalions russia's plans for "Novorossiya" would have definitely found more success. Despite that the government knew that change had to come, so they made the move to officially incorporate the unit into the National Guard of Ukraine as a regiment.
With this came a lot of changes. Most of the far-right members present in the beginning left the newly formed regiment as well as russian agents infiltrating the unit. The regiment also had to create a new logo and now officially became known as "Azov".
This new logo of Azov has been critized by Western media for supposedly being a wolfsangel (as seen on the right), but in fact it's a combination of the letters N and I. This combination of letters stands for "Ідея Нації", which translates to "Idea of the Nation".
After this point the newly found regiment received a large influx of new members from all over Ukraine, whith most of them now not having any political background, their motivation solely being the protection of their people against russia.
Many of the former far right members moved into politics hoping to gain political success from the achievements of the Azov regiment. As expected every single far right party in Ukraine failed miserably. Ukraine doesn't have a far right problem, as some like you to believe.
How exactly the Azov regiment is perceived by some as a "threat" rather than a group of brave men and women defending their homeland remains a mystery to me. Mariupol has large Jewish, Greek and muslim communities and non of them have reported any harassment from the regiment.
In fact they even have Jewish people in high ranks and Israel even welcomed one of the commanders as a honored guest. Azov cooperates with a lot of the muslim units in the AFU, like for example the Sheikh Mansur and Dudayev battalions.
In 2017 most of the remaining members with "neo-nazi" tendencies left the regiment, as from this point onwords the display of political views was forbidden, especially if it affects members of the regiment belonging to minority groups.
The reason this rumor about the Azov battalion is still in circulation, is due to the fact that russia has utilized the chaotic first year of the regiment as a propaganda tool from the very beginning and especially since 2022, due to their "denazification" excuse for genocide.
They have literally being pinning every single conspiracy theory and "justification" for their genocide in Ukraine to this one regiment. From the "Donbas genocide" lie, to the "Denazification" lie. There are real Neo-Nazi groups in Ukraine. The Azov battalion is not one of them.
These very harmful, genocide enabling rumours about "Neo-Nazi battalions" in Ukraine were strengthend a lot by certain individuals in the West, who didn't care to do proper research, like our man SDL here. It certainly had an influence on the brutality Mariupol was treated with.
Eternal memory to ALL defenders of Mariupol, who died defending the city from the absolute bloodbath russia caused. May the tens of thousands of civilians who died in that city, rest in peace.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Land of Rus’ referred to the realm around Kyiv, Chernihiv, and Pereiaslav (in modern-day Ukraine). Novgorod and Suzdal were not considered part of Rus’ proper.
Anyone who claims otherwise simply hasn’t read, or is ignoring, the contemporary sources.
Let me prove it to you🧵⬇️
Exhibit A: Yaroslav vs. Sviatopolk on the Dnipro (1016)
Context: Yaroslav marched with the Novgorodians towards the Dnipro to confront Sviatopolk, whose army consisted of “Russes and Pechenegs.”
-> clear distinction between the men of Rus’ and the Novgorodians.
Exhibit B: Yaroslav and Mstislav Divide Rus’ (1026)
Context: Yaroslav and Mstislav partitioned Rus’ along the Dnipro river: Yaroslav held Kyiv and its side of the river, while Mstislav ruled the left-bank with his seat at Chernihiv.
The writers of Superman actually did an interesting thing here. They basically said "🇺🇦🇵🇸," which gave them the defense of reasonable doubt against accusations of being anti-a-certain-country.
Details that make it 🇺🇦/🇷🇺:
- conflict mentioned to be in Eastern Europe
- Borovians speak slavic language
- Borovia is a dictatorship
- Borovians claim to free Jarhanpur in a contradictory way just like russia
- Borovia invades first
- Borovias capital looks somewhat like Moscow
Details that make it 🇵🇸/🇮🇱:
- Borovia is long-time ally of US
- Borovia has a highly advanced military
- Uniforms look Israeli
- Jarhanpur is mostly desert
- Most Jarhanpunis look broadly asian/middle eastern (but also a few European looking people among them)
Berezovsky’s Monster:
How the man who made Putin paid for it with his life.
A Thread🧵
Russia 1999: Russia was in crisis. President Yeltsin was unpopular and in poor health. The economy was unstable, and the nation still hadn't recovered from its defeat in the Chechen War. Oligarchs held major influence over politics, business, and the media.
Boris Berezovsky was one of the most powerful oligarchs. He held stakes in oil, cars, and media. He had close ties to the Yeltsin administration and was part of the so-called “Family,” a group of influential people with access to the president.
Here’s what Voltaire, one of the leading figures of the Enlightenment, had to say about Ukraine as a nation in 1731, in Book Four of "Histoire de Charles XII", page 85:
(Translated from the original French)
A thread 🧵
"Ukraine has always aspired to be free, but surrounded by Muscovy, the Ottoman Empire, and Poland, it was forced to seek a protector and thus, inevitably, a master."
Ukraine first sought protection from Poland, but was treated too much as a subject. So it turned to Muscovy, which ruled it harshly. At first, Ukrainians could elect their own leader, the Hetman. But even this right was later stripped by Moscow.
How a single treaty disproves 3 Kremlin myths: The Pereiaslav Agreement (1654)
❌️Muscovy was known as "Russia" even before Peter I
❌️Ukrainians wanted to "reunite" with Muscovy
❌️Ukrainian and Russian were mutually intelligible before modern Ukr. nationalism
A thread🧵
What was the Pereiaslav Agreement? In 1654, the Cossack Hetmanate, led by Bohdan Khmelnytsky, negotiated with Tsar Alexis of Muscovy. The goal was a mutual defense pact: the Hetmanate would swear allegiance to the Tsar in exchange for guarantees of Ukrainian autonomy.
How Rusyns/Ruthenians became Ukrainians, and Muscovites became Russians:
An argument for the historical continuity of Rus' through Kyiv—not Moscow.
A thread🧵
To begin with, what were the historical lands of Rus'?
Originally, Rus' centered around Kyiv. When people from other principalities like Novgorod said “I’m going to Rus',” they meant Kyiv and the lands surrounding Kyiv. Kyiv, Chernihiv, Pereiaslav— those were the core Rus' lands
These Rus' lands formed the political and cultural heart of the loose East Slavic federation known today as "Kyivan Rus'". But historically such a term didn't exist.