The current Prime Minister now has twice as many fixed penalty notices as the previous Prime Minister bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politi…
Some people will think these things are trivial but as I say in #EmergencyState I think the disregard for the law at the current top of British politics suggests they think they are above the law - that they are somehow different, and special
Remember - fixed penalty notices are given for behaviour which can lead to a criminal conviction - the FPN is a way of avoiding prosecution. Not the most serious offences, but still offences
The rule of law means that those who make the law are also bound by it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
These are the UK government's reasons for triggering section 35 of the Scotland Act 1998
One initial thought in this thread - I'm sure there will be a huge amount more interesting commentry gov.uk/government/pub…
Relevant bit of s.35:
1 If a Bill contains provisions
b which make modifications of the law as it applies to reserved matters and which the Sec of State has reasonable grounds to believe would have an adverse effect on the operation of the law as it applies to reserved matters,
There are therefore two tests which must both be satisfied: (1) "make modifications of the law as it applies to reserved matters" AND (2) "reasonable grounds to believe would have an adverse effect on the operation of the law as it applies to reserved matters"
Good analysis from a right to freedom of assembly standpoint by Prof. Keith Ewing and Lord John Hendy KC here (relating to previous bill with more limited extent): ier.org.uk/comments/trans…
Just preparing my talk for Sunday - starting with Liversidge v Anderson and ending with the Public Order Bill, will be a whirlwind tour of illiberalness!
Still struggling to believe how extensive the Public Order Bill anti-protest powers are
Also can't quite believe these were the five guys who decided the intricacies of our private and social lives for over two years, with Parliament sidelined...
I have fallen down the extraordinarily interesting and desperately sad rabbit hole of Liversidge v Anderson in preparation for my @limmud session next week on emergency powers
Liversidge was indeed the son of a rabbi but in the Home Office's Statement of Case against him his father was upgraded to the Chief Rabbi
A Home Office advisory committee report referred to an investigation into "Jew swindlers" (with which Liversidge was alleged to be involved in)
I remain of the view that nobody will ever be sent to Rwanda for their asylum claims to be processed there. But I have been wrong before!
There will probably be appeals to the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court after that, and potentially to the European Court of Human Rights after that. Unless the govt manages to operate the scheme in the meantime I can't see those cases being resolved before the next election.
And if the domestic appeals are resolved by the next election (which is possible) and if the govt ignores the European Court/it rules the scheme is lawful, the flights will still be subject to individual legal challenges along the lines of deportation flights.