I’ve always had huge respect for Germany. The way they properly reflected & rejected their totalitarian past was inspiring.
From a Baltic perspective, it always served as a sharp contrast to Russia’s inability to do the same.
But that goodwill to Germany has been shattered.
Everyone said “never again”.
But Germany mistook that from a self-absorbed perspective to mean only Germany shall never again be the aggressor.
They didn’t consider what “never again” means for other countries - like them now - having to deal with an expansionist fascist power.
Over the past year, we’ve discovered how badly we too misunderstood Germany.
Germany seems to think it has a debt to the Moscow ally it started WW2 with …but, somehow, not to the countries of Eastern Europe in-between that they waged their war against.
From our perspective, the entire tank debate is absolutely batshit crazy. Incomprehensible. We could understand the naïveté towards Russian imperialism in the 90s, perhaps after 2014, even January last year …but not during the full scale attempted genocide of a sovereign nation.
We see a lot of bad takes about how the Baltic states are helping Ukraine because it’s a conflict in our region.
But Germany is closer to Ukraine than Estonia. Berlin is closer than Tallinn.
The Baltics are giving everything they can because we truly believe “never again”.
I still have many friends in Germany - but I don’t think they or the wider country are anywhere close to comprehending how perceptions of Germany have plummeted among its closest friends.
Having said all this, I still know there are plenty of Germans here online who have been outstanding at opposing Russian imperialism & supporting Ukraine, as well as being true friends of the Baltics states & Eastern Europe. We still believe in you.
Perhaps Germany just wants to delay, be criticised, then approve due to its historical need to act as the opposite to an aggressor - even when that behaviour suits an actual aggressor.
But Germany needs to reflect again on its history - how it colluded with Moscow against Eastern Europe - and urgently learn what it means to be a country that now must stand up to an expansionist fascist power that it once was.
Jeremy Corbyn, the former Iranian state TV presenter, used to always call for “troops out” to end wars & occupations.
But when Russia is waging a genocidal war, he switches to calling for a settlement that keeps troops in. 🤔
Let’s talk about Jeremy Corbyn. 🧵…
Kremlin sympathisers currently like to say that all wars must end in some kind of halfway settlement.
This is, of course, not true - & not something they say about wars they oppose - but it would reward Russia’s genocide, amidst ongoing Russian losses that truly concern Corbyn.
In addition to shilling for authoritarian regimes, Corbyn was also previously the UK’s opposition leader.
He used that job to promote every Kremlin position imaginable, including opposing NATO cooperation between the UK & the Baltic countries.
P*tin likes to say that the Soviet Union was dissolved against the wishes of the people of the Soviet Union.
It’s a delusion repeated with increasing frequency online, often referencing the 1991 Soviet referendum, like here.
It is total nonsense. 🧵…
That 1991 referendum wasn’t about preserving the Soviet Union or not.
It was a loaded and confused question.
Voters were asked if they wanted to preserve the USSR but proceed with what would be a reformed & redefined USSR (literally by replacing ‘Socialist’ with ‘Sovereign’).
Gorbachev was trying to appease widespread revolt & dissatisfaction by gaining a mandate for lacklustre reforms that would supposedly reduce its oppressive, Moscow-controlled structure - and, most crucially, strengthen his fight against breakaway states.
Sorry to everyone who has only just discovered the existence of George Galloway - the Kremlin propagandist, former British politician, and… cat impersonator (ask the Brits).
Some of his poorly aged tweets have resurfaced in recent days so I should add this one too:
It’s rare that Kremlin propagandists will admit to being paid to act like an idiot but that is, in fact, what he did during his invasion denialism at the start of last year:
As you can see, it is possible to preserve your national language - despite the odds of history - while also confidently conversing with others in theirs.
🧵…
To understand why the Baltic nations survived and thrive as independent republics, its importance to understand the value they place on language.
The right to speak their language was the driving force of their respective National Awakening movements that led to independence.
Usual caveat here: Lithuania’s pre-Republic history is very different to Latvia & Estonia’s. The Lithuanian National Awakening was more of a National Revival, having had a long history of (multilingual) statehood already but restoring it as a nation state for Lithuanian speakers.
I’m so grateful to everyone who helps support this account.
I’d like us to do something bigger, together. Not just to challenge old stereotypes & combat propaganda, but help show the world everything great about the Baltic countries too.
But I need your help to figure out how.
Estonia, Latvia, & Lithuania are, of course, three very different countries - but I love them all. We have common values and I think there’s so much more we can do together to celebrate & defend our countries online - in our own style.
Helping the world understand our history, culture, and perspectives is so important - but I think we’re missing something pan-Baltic in English (or other international languages).
After all these years, the worst Baltic takes are still from those who try to justify or minimise the Nazi-Soviet Pact and its devastating consequences.
Here’s the irony though. It was exactly those takes that helped free us all from the Soviet Union. 🧵…
While the Baltic peoples were always fiercely opposed to occupation, it took time to understand the secret protocols of the Pact (“MRP”) that enabled their illegal annexation.
This knowledge galvanised the independence movement around a complete rejection of all totalitarianism.
In an attempt to minimise public anger, the Soviets finally acknowledged the secret protocols that led to the armed, brutal Soviet takeover of the Baltic states …but also, illogically, denied it had any legal impact on their status within the USSR. latimes.com/archives/la-xp….