How Russia uses frozen enclaves to dominate the post-Soviet space;
The folly of “negotiating” with Russia;
Does the Biden Administration understand that a frozen conflict is victory for Russia?
Does the West understand how catastrophic a Russian victory would be?
Do the big powers want Ukraine to win?
The Western approach-avoidance conflict;
Loose nukes and the Budapest Memorandum;
Why Russia won’t break up on ethnic lines, but might descend into medieval warlordism;
The schism between Central and Eastern Europe and the Franco-German engine;
Why Germany won’t #FreeTheLeopards;
The West’s leadership deficit.
Should you be able to burn the Koran in Sweden?
The sources and consequences of European technocracy;
Why is the West dominated by mediocrities?
Will we succeed in getting enough weapons into Ukraine’s hands?
Will Ukraine run out of bullets before Russia runs out of bodies?
The brewing Russian counteroffensive;
The prospects for a Russian uprising;
The prospects for a Russian Night of the Long Knives;
The prospects for a liberal Russia;
The sources of Russia’s resentment of Ukraine;
How Ukrainians envision the future;
How we rate Biden’s management of the conflict;
Is Jake Sullivan the Administration’s weak link?
What it will take to get the Russians out of Ukraine?
Will Russian war criminals ever face justice?
Why are America’s National Conservatives so obtuse?
What we’d do differently if we were running the Biden Administration.
While I do think understanding the origins of Covid19 matters, and very much, I agree with the rest of the sentiment here: No matter where Covid19 came from, the risk of the leak of a dangerous pathogen is *extremely* high, and we're not doing enough to militate against it.
It's important to understand how intimately involved the instigators of January 6 were in inciting the January 8 violence in Brazil. It didn't look so similar by coincidence. claireberlinski.substack.com/p/the-insurrec…
Eduardo Bolsinaro participated in the so-called War Council on the eve of January 6, with Mike Lindell, Michael Flynn, Rudy Giuliani, and Sidney Powell. Th Bolsonaros then replicated the experiment in Brazil--
--with the aid of exactly the people who performed the initial experiment on the United States.
Bannon, Tucker Carlson, Elon Musk, and the whole January 6 crew (except for Trump himself) were significantly responsible for what happened in Brazil.
Yesterday, after we published this article about the Pretoria peace agreement claireberlinski.substack.com/p/the-pretoria…, one of our readers expressed surprise that he'd read so little before about the conflict in Tigray. I think it's shocking how under-covered this story is, too
But as I explained to him, this is why @cosmo_globalist exists: Serious foreign news coverage has all but disappeared from the Anglophone media. Here's our About page, where I explain why: claireberlinski.substack.com/about
"This publication," we write, "was borne of the observation that genuinely global news coverage has all but disappeared from the Anglophone media."
If, like our reader, you're shocked to learn how significant the Tigray conflict is (it's *by far* the biggest war in the world),
The Age of Spectacle: If you missed it yesterday, this essay by Adam Garfinkle argues that the single most important thing to grasp, when trying to understand the political dysfunction we're seeing, is the rise of what he calls the Spectocracy: open.substack.com/pub/claireberl…
Spectocracy, he argues, emerges from three distinct political and social trends, which he describes in the essay. Among them: the loss of deep literacy and the ubiquity of mediated images:
Don't forget, you can sign up for a free trial week to read it--and all the other outstanding essays that await you at @cosmo_globalist, which is, as one reader just wrote to us, "getting better every time. Congratulations, you're providing something unique."
I saw this and for a second, before I realized who was speaking, I thought this would be about the penetration of US social media companies by *foreign* intelligence agencies. No. They mean our own intel agencies.
I think they need a review.
Tucker, when Americans cooperate with *American* intel agencies, that's good, actually. It's patriotic.
It's when you cooperate with *Russian* intel agencies that it's bad. That's unpatriotic.
See, the relevant category here isn't "intel agency." It's "on our side."
I can see how this might be confusing, though, and how you'd be thinking, "Everyone keeps screaming at me for cooperating with the SVR--but look what Twitter did! They cooperated with the CIA!"
After publishing this survey by @FrencLindley of the situation in Ukraine and its strategic implications for the West (and the world), I received a letter from a (discerning) reader yesterday saying it was superb: claireberlinski.substack.com/p/in-and-beyon…
And that CG just keeps getting "better and better," and that we're providing something "unique." (I live for emails like that, so never hesitate.)
I thought this was a particularly notable essay too, which is why I begged @FrencLindley to let us run it.
Note: It's behind the paywall, but we offer the first week for free. So unless you've used that already, it's free. (If you used it already and you want another free week, send me an email: It sounds like you could use a free subscription, which as it happens, a reader donated.)