The is no real moral equivalency. Responsibility to Protect is a valid military measure. The U.S., however, used lies to invoke R2P, while Russia's reasons are valid.
McFaul's 'thief who breaks into your house' analogy is also stupid. What's going on in Ukraine is more like: A husband (UA government) is beating the shit out of his wife (Donbass), and she manages to call the cops (Russia)...
Does that husband have a right to continue beating his wife? Should a neighbor then intervene to provide that husband with weapons so he can fight off the cops who came to protect the wife from being murdered?
I guess McFaul would argue that the wife deserves to get the shit beat out of her. Hell... he was perfectly fine with handing that abusive husband the baseball bat (400 tons of lethal aid) that he used again her to begin with.
Deputy Prosecutor General Oleksiy Symonenko, who has protected Zelenskyy and his inner circle from corruption charges, has also reportedly resigned. kyivindependent.com/news-feed/medi…
Despite admitting that there's no sign (evidence or hint) that the Russian government would use terrorism against Western states, the "experts" *believe* Rus Fed has directed RIM to do terrorism, even though RIM is an anti-Putin org, co-opted by the CIA. archive.ph/rdq5y
2011... Navalny leading an anti-Putin march, under the RIM banner.
I have little doubt that RIM is anti-Ukraine, but that doesn't make them pro- Russian Federation or instruments of the Russian government. They are, in fact, anti- Russian government. Experts on Russia should know this, but they pretend otherwise when it's convenient for them.
Studies show that Ivermectin is an effective pre-exposure prophylactic. It would have made a significant difference to people at high risk for exposure, but nurses were demonized for trying to promote its use. journals.lww.com/americantherap…
As far as new variants escaping antibodies - this is the normal evolution of zoonotic pathogens. By the time a zoonotic virus has reached this level, it is usually pretty harmless. It survives up to this level *because* it has evolved to a less harmful version of itself...
I agree that we shouldn't give in to "nuclear blackmail". We shouldn't let nuclear threats stop us from doing the right thing. But I'm not convinced that continuing to arm Ukraine to spite a nuclear armed country is "right". Russia is in Ukraine to protect Donbass from Nazis.
This "nuclear blackmail" thing is a line I used to fall for. "We gonna let big bad Russia get away with this? Hell no!" But I now realize - get away with what? Stopping the new Nazi Menace? We should be on Russia's side on this, like we were in WW2. Why aren't we?
I draw a red line at helping the 4th Reich. Realizing that you're on the side of folks who want to start WW3 to "lead the white nations in a final crusade against the semite-led untermenschen" should make any decent person hit the brakes.
The more research I do into WW2 Nazi propaganda the clearer it is that Nazis meant to exterminate Jews *and* Russians. In Goebbels' own writings, he rarely just said "Jews". Rather, he referenced Bolshevik Jews or something similar that considered Jews & Russians as the same ppl.
I also am sickened to realize that anti-Soviet propaganda that the West used during the Cold War parroted Nazi propaganda that was used to provoke/justify the Holocaust, except they edited out the "Jew" part of "Bolshevik Jew".
Our government didn't just copy Nazi propaganda... they recycled Nazi propaganda films. For example, the propaganda film Red Mist. They edited out the parts referring to evil Jews and left everything else in it, to provoke hatred against the USSR.
I am confident that Bakhmut will be liberated quickly, and I'm sure UA knows it. I'm sure that's why Zelenskyy's team went there - to evacuate Biletsky...
The whole thing about giving out medals was stupid, considering Zelenskyy already gave out medals to the same battalion just weeks before, in Kherson. It was a ruse. They had to get Biletsky out before the front line moved.