Everyone is harsh on Germany lately, but one must be aware that, indeed, there is logic to Berlin's actions. As I said before - I think 🇩🇪's actions are driven by 2 factors. (1/11)
First - the existence of a strong 🇷🇺 helped mitigate the reemergence of a strong neighbourhood East of 🇩🇪. It is both in 🇷🇺 and 🇩🇪 interests, and NS1/2 was a natural derivative of it. (2/11)
Second - as 🇷🇺 threw the baby out of the bathwater and presented itself as murderers to the world, it became totally impossible to side with 🇷🇺 in any visible way. But the interests remain. Now with 🇷🇺's collapse not so out of the question, (3/11)
the natural reemergence of a stronger neighbourhood East of 🇩🇪, whatever we call it, becomes a possibility. 🇵🇱🇺🇦 would be a natural core of it. Even if 🇺🇦 wins the war it won't happen in a year or even a decade. But the process due to the geographical proximity, (4/11)
cultural connections, unifying threats, and bonds created during the war, would be set in motion. With 🇺🇦's natural resources, 🇵🇱's growing economic capabilities and combined geographical potential being the entry to Europe from East, (5/11)
it could be a worrying prosect for 🇩🇪's elites. The worst case scenario being 🇵🇱🇺🇦 alliance matching the geopolitical weight of 🇩🇪, and even having more promising perspectives due to the resources on the East should Russia collapse. (6/11)
For German companies and even German citizens, that could mean degrading their standards of living, which is largely built on 🇷🇺 resources and brainpower from the East.
So even if some will argue that such a scenario won't happen because of corruption, (7/11)
🇵🇱🇺🇦 conflicts etc., one can't totally dismiss it. And Berlin does not.
All this leads to tough questions, especially for 🇩🇪 ordinary citizens. Would you agree that your (or more accurately, (8/11)
your children's) standard of living be comparable to the one of a Pole or Ukrainian? Or if 🇩🇪 economy be as large as 🇵🇱🇺🇦 combined? I think these are the questions 🇩🇪 politicians are asking themselves behind closed doors, (9/11)
but morality is playing against them currently.
And because politicians tend to see geopolitics as a zero-sum game the answer to the above questions is simply - 'No'.
I do not endorse this response, but I understand it. (10/11)
The process stands valid regardless of who is in power.
(11/11)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵 A thread about A.Dugin’s speech after the invasion of Ukraine and why the misuse of geopolitics can lead to devastating consequences, like an invasion of Ukraine. 1/n
To start - Aleksandr Dugin is a Russian political analyst, considered one of the main Kremlin thinkers. Below is a short summary of his 30min lecture. The video is dated March 6th. 2/n
We (Russia) tried to speak the language of the West, it failed. Now we are speaking our own language. Russia is a civilization of its own. Russia is an isolated island. Big island. 3/n
Pan "robi internety" i już wie, że "wybujałe teorie się nie sprawdziły".
Z przykrością obserwuję obecną nagonkę na JB, która zastanawiająco uaktywniła się od czasu początku wojny (w szczególności poprzez prześmiewcze memy). 1/n
Smutne jest również to, że nawet w tak ważnych dla nas kwestiach jak bezpieczeństwo i niepodległość wyśmiewamy osoby, które z własnej nieprzymuszonej woli zrobiły coś z niczego by to poprawić. 2/n
A wkład Jacka Bartosiaka w rozruszanie polskiego społeczeństwa jest niebagatelny. Sam mogę przyznać, że JB był jedną z inspiracji do startu projektu Good Times Bad Times. GTBT to po 2 latach globalna platforma, którą na świecie ogląda miliony ludzi po PL, EN i RU 3/n
Russia started its plan to restore the Soviet Union in 2007 (when they delivered the Munich speech). The planning began in 2004, after Ukraine's Maidan in 2004.
The initial plan was to complete it by 2023, but due to sanctions it was necessary to multiply it by 1.5x, so Arestovych claims that back then the plan was to finish it by 2032/2035.