Jan Eeckhout Profile picture
Jan 23 9 tweets 3 min read
I don’t think people fully appreciate that high inflation in the US and the Euro area is over. We are back at 2%

Part of the high inflation perception today is measurement: instantaneous inflation in December is 2% instead of the conventional measure of 6.5%

1/9
Why is conventional inflation so high still?

Prices are recorded monthly, so Inflation numbers come in monthly. There are 2 issues:
1. Magnitude
2. Averaging

2/
1. Magnitude. The price change month-to-month is a lot smaller than year-to-year. Because we are used to talking about annual rates, we transform monthly rates into annual rates. E.g., a monthly price change of 1% is 12.7% annually (more than times 12 because of compounding)

3/
2. Averaging. The monthly data are noisy (sales, human error, weather,…). Seasonally adjusting helps, but noise remains, so we use multiple observations to minimize the noise. Therefore we use all 12 monthly observations rather than just 1 to calculate the inflation rate

4/
Averaging is fine when inflation is stable with no sharp in/decrease. But that is not the story of the last two years. Yearly averaging puts as much weight on monthly observations from 12 months ago as on last month. So we obtain the average inflation from 6 months ago

5/
So why not use multiple monthly readings of inflation, but put more weight on recent observations and less on the distant past. We use kernel weights that trade off the averaging needed due to noisy data against the need to have instantaneous inflation readings

6/
The differences are big: 6.5% versus 2%

This has profound implications for monetary policy as the Central Bank may be reacting to old news. It also affects expectations, inflation-indexed financial assets, labor contracts, and fiscal policy

7/

janeeckhout.com/wp-content/upl…
Core inflation, food, and commodities are falling fast (commodities inflation is negative). Services inflation is high and on the rise

8/
Inflation in the Euro area mirrors what happens in the United States, though Euro inflation is still above the 2% target.

The UK, Japan, and Australia do not show much of a declining trend in inflation

9/9

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jan Eeckhout

Jan Eeckhout Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jan_eeckhout

Apr 20, 2022
Some time ago a WSJ journalist calls me while I am on vacation to talk about an article he is writing on Market Power. After 2 calls, and more than 3 hours of conversation, he says: “I don’t believe your numbers for markups”

1/5
I say: “I can give you the data and the code. I can translate it to Excel. Want to talk about production function estimation? Omitted price bias? The instrument? The control function approach?…”

2/
He says: “No, it’s not that… If market power is such a big issue, why is no American economist working on it, and only Europeans with funny names such as Philippon, Zingales, Marinescu, De Loecker,…?”

@ThomasPHI2 @zingales @mioana

3/
Read 5 tweets
Apr 18, 2022
Are we as the academic community of economists ready to take responsibility for the miserable economic state Russia is in today?

1/16
With the collapse of communism, in the early 1990s prominent economists from top institutions packed their bags and moved into apartments near the Kremlin

2/
They had the ear of Boris Yeltsin and his advisors and with the support of IMF, WB, EBRD they convinced Yeltsin that fast privatization was the best transition path towards a modern market economy

3/
Read 16 tweets
Jan 11, 2022
Delightful article on the brilliant @DrDaronAcemoglu

Technological change is behind wage stagnation

If Output=AK^aL^b

then in the Robots papers, investment in robots lower b => workers become less productive => wage stagnation/labor share falls

1/5

nytimes.com/2022/01/11/tec…
Yet, when we estimate b (and a), both do not fall and instead we see rising Returns To Scale (mainly due to intangibles, ie technological change). Rather than lowering b, intangibles increase it

2/5
How can we reconcile a,b rising (or at least not falling) yet K and L share falling: that is, labor productivity increases yet L and K fall?

The answer is Profits. Markets have become less competitive

3/5
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(