I don’t think people fully appreciate that high inflation in the US and the Euro area is over. We are back at 2%
Part of the high inflation perception today is measurement: instantaneous inflation in December is 2% instead of the conventional measure of 6.5%
1/9
Why is conventional inflation so high still?
Prices are recorded monthly, so Inflation numbers come in monthly. There are 2 issues: 1. Magnitude 2. Averaging
2/
1. Magnitude. The price change month-to-month is a lot smaller than year-to-year. Because we are used to talking about annual rates, we transform monthly rates into annual rates. E.g., a monthly price change of 1% is 12.7% annually (more than times 12 because of compounding)
3/
2. Averaging. The monthly data are noisy (sales, human error, weather,…). Seasonally adjusting helps, but noise remains, so we use multiple observations to minimize the noise. Therefore we use all 12 monthly observations rather than just 1 to calculate the inflation rate
4/
Averaging is fine when inflation is stable with no sharp in/decrease. But that is not the story of the last two years. Yearly averaging puts as much weight on monthly observations from 12 months ago as on last month. So we obtain the average inflation from 6 months ago
5/
So why not use multiple monthly readings of inflation, but put more weight on recent observations and less on the distant past. We use kernel weights that trade off the averaging needed due to noisy data against the need to have instantaneous inflation readings
6/
The differences are big: 6.5% versus 2%
This has profound implications for monetary policy as the Central Bank may be reacting to old news. It also affects expectations, inflation-indexed financial assets, labor contracts, and fiscal policy
Some time ago a WSJ journalist calls me while I am on vacation to talk about an article he is writing on Market Power. After 2 calls, and more than 3 hours of conversation, he says: “I don’t believe your numbers for markups”
1/5
I say: “I can give you the data and the code. I can translate it to Excel. Want to talk about production function estimation? Omitted price bias? The instrument? The control function approach?…”
2/
He says: “No, it’s not that… If market power is such a big issue, why is no American economist working on it, and only Europeans with funny names such as Philippon, Zingales, Marinescu, De Loecker,…?”
Are we as the academic community of economists ready to take responsibility for the miserable economic state Russia is in today?
1/16
With the collapse of communism, in the early 1990s prominent economists from top institutions packed their bags and moved into apartments near the Kremlin
2/
They had the ear of Boris Yeltsin and his advisors and with the support of IMF, WB, EBRD they convinced Yeltsin that fast privatization was the best transition path towards a modern market economy
3/
Yet, when we estimate b (and a), both do not fall and instead we see rising Returns To Scale (mainly due to intangibles, ie technological change). Rather than lowering b, intangibles increase it
2/5
How can we reconcile a,b rising (or at least not falling) yet K and L share falling: that is, labor productivity increases yet L and K fall?
The answer is Profits. Markets have become less competitive
3/5