Navalny's team has launched a huge Free Navalny campaign with @anneapplebaum among its advisers and aspirations to win the Oscar for the Navalny movie. Good for them.
Ukrainians and many other nations colonized by Russia are increasingly critical of the campaign.
Here's why:
1/
Many prominent voices have already raised concerns about Navalny's far-right and racist views, so we're not going to focus on Navalny himself.
Instead, let's talk about the positioning of the Free Navalny campaign and its stated goals.
What is it aiming to achieve?
2/
The campaign tries to raise awareness about Navalny's imprisonment and the need to free him from Putin's criminal regime.
Unfortunately, it's not 2014 anymore. Putin doesn't care about western sanctions, and public pressure won't force Putin to suddenly release Navalny.
3/
The only condition under which Navalny can be freed is if the regime is somehow forced to do it or if Putin is out of power.
The only force that de-facto fights Putin's regime and has a chance of defeating it is... Ukraine's armed forces. Navalny's team should realize that.
4/
But Free Navalny does nothing to join our cause.
It never called for military support to Ukraine, and it never acknowledged that the fight of Ukraine is their fight as well.
Free Navalny is based on a vague idea that freeing Navalny would somehow make Russia democratic.
5/
Instead of becoming a true force for change (even in exile), Navalny's team operates as harmless, planless intelligentsia fighting for media attention and donations.
It ignores the fact that Ukrainians are doing all the actual work for them all while defending their land.
6/
While Free Navalny does nothing to support Ukraine's victory and Putin's military defeat, they do exploit the anti-war sentiment to whitewash Navalny's reputation and insert themselves into the international effort to support Ukraine.
"Be against war, free Navalny" they say.
6/
Navalny hasn't been a prominent anti-war voice since the 2014 occupation of Crimea in the first place, but let's omit that for a second.
The fact that Free Navalny is trying to use anti-war rhetoric to increase international support for the campaign is simply dirty.
7/
It's dirty because it uses international anti-war sentiment and directs it to a cause that has no plan of action and no real impact.
Every dollar donated to Free Navalny is a dollar that could be applied much more effectively if donated to Ukraine's resistance.
8/
And this is not a minor mistake of Navalny's campaign. There is a system to Navalny's treatment of Ukraine's resistance.
In 2015, Navalny already called for the US not to arm Ukraine because "military victory of Ukraine over Russia is impossible." 9/
In the spring of 2022, Navalny compared the efficiency of military support to Ukraine to funding the anti-war digital ads campaign within Russia.
Team Navalny doesn't care about Ukraine's fight. They treat it as their primary fundraising competitor.
10/
That is why they get increasingly annoyed by the criticism coming from Ukraine.
The Ukrainians are telling the uncomfortable truth: the best way to free Navalny is to donate to Ukraine's military resistance – not to a team of YouTubers and politicians in exile.
11/
Plus, freeing the Navalny – although a just cause in essence – is not inherently anti-war and not a solution to Russia's bloody imperial project.
Until Free Navalny stops exploiting Ukraine's cause and starts actually supporting it, the Ukrainians will remain skeptical.
12/12
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Today, a lot of Christians in Ukraine are celebrating Christmas. This is a perfect day to remind ourselves that Ukraine is a complicated mixture of religious branches and church dynamics.
A thread.
Quick side note: this thread is a part of our new explainer available to all on our Patreon: bit.ly/explainers29
Do check it out if you enjoy the article format better!
Back to the thread.
1. Christian since 988, always diverse
For the last thousand years, Ukraine has been home to strong Christian, Muslim and Judaic communities, along with other religious minorities.
We need to talk about Ukraine's red-black flag – one of the most controversial and misunderstood symbols of the Ukrainian resistance.
Where did it come from? Does it represent right-wing extremism? What does it mean for Ukrainians?
Buckle up, it's a long thread! ❤️🖤
Sidenote: you can read the full version of this explainer with lots of links on our Patreon:
Now, back to the thread.
Flags are a relatively modern phenomenon: most European states got their flags in the 19-20 centuries with the rise of the idea of sovereign nation-states.
Flags were either invented from scratch or based on the local heraldic and folklore traditions. Ukraine is no exception.
How the USSR deliberately starved to death 4.5 million Ukrainians and then tried to cover it up.
A thread.
Sidenote: this thread is a shortened version of our new explainer. The full article is available here: bit.ly/uaexplainers27
Let's get back to the thread.
“Holodomor” literally means “murder by starvation.” It refers to a state-managed famine of 1932-1933 when the USSR starved to death 4.5 million Ukrainians (up 7 million acc to other studies).
The Holodomor is considered a genocide in Ukraine and 20+ other countries.