Thread by @Kim_Picazio

@LaurieDaMadCat @CatherineVents @FoxFace8675309 @Aus80John @ClarityCalling @greggraham020 @Punisher4T @Emily_Mar7 @August00017 1) JC's affidavit was filed with the federal Court in that case; (2)that does not make her a federal witness since she wasn't testifying for the federal govt; (3) the ct found the claims in the affidavit(previously published in a video by Plaintiff) to be knowingly "false". See👇

@LaurieDaMadCat @CatherineVents @FoxFace8675309 @Aus80John @ClarityCalling @greggraham020 @Punisher4T @Emily_Mar7 @August00017 (4)the law firm referenced that affidavit because it was filed in support of Plaintiff's motions(all denied by the ct); (4)court found the affidavits "pointless" but allowed to "occupy the docket" [see below](5)she can rely on my representations as truth because they always are.

@LaurieDaMadCat @CatherineVents @FoxFace8675309 @Aus80John @ClarityCalling @greggraham020 @Punisher4T @Emily_Mar7 @August00017 For clarity, the Court made a final ruling on who tells the truth and who doesn't.

@LaurieDaMadCat @CatherineVents @FoxFace8675309 @Aus80John @ClarityCalling @greggraham020 @Punisher4T @Emily_Mar7 @August00017 Here's the Court's final Order so you can check my math. The case is now closed.
acrobat.adobe.com/link/track?uri…