Post

More from @JaipurDialogues

The Jaipur Dialogues

@JaipurDialogues

Jan 27

Trump Tells Columbia to "F**k around and Find Out"😂

Series of Events:

The ongoing diplomatic dispute between the United States and Colombia took a new turn after Colombia refused to allow two US military planes to land on its soil.

These planes were transporting deported migrants from the US as part of President Donald Trump’s strict immigration policies. According to the US Defence Department and the Department of Homeland Security, the flights were intended to return around 80 Colombian nationals back to their country.

/1

Trump reacted sharply to Colombia’s decision, publicly condemning the move as a violation of international law and a threat to US national security. This prompted a strong response from the US president, who immediately announced a series of retaliatory measures.

In a post shared on Truth Social, Trump warned of harsh penalties for Colombia, including significant tariffs and sanctions. "Emergency 25% tariffs on all goods coming into the United States. In one week, the 25% tariffs will be raised to 50%," Trump stated. He also announced visa bans for Colombian government officials, enhanced customs inspections of Colombian nationals and cargo, and financial sanctions through the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

/2

In response to Trump’s harsh measures, Colombia swiftly escalated the conflict by announcing its own retaliatory tariffs. Colombian officials stated that they would impose a 50% tariff on all US imports.

President Gustavo Petro expressed his discontent by posting on social media, "I am informed that you impose a 50% tariff on the fruits of our human labour to enter the United States, and I do the same." This move signalled a direct response to Trump’s sanctions and illustrated the rising tension ..

/3

Read 6 tweets

The Jaipur Dialogues

@JaipurDialogues

Jan 27

The recently released Chavva trailer is under fire, with some calling it "Islamophobic." But why are many Muslims relating themselves to a tyrant like Aurangzeb? What’s the common link between them?

Long Thread:

Aurangzeb, the Mughal emperor, is infamous for his religious fanaticism. His actions included:

-Demolishing Hindu temples
-Re-imposing the jizya tax on non-Muslims
-Mass conversions and executions of those who refused Islam

Were these personal whims? Or was Aurangzeb following doctrine?

/1

Aurangzeb believed he was a good Muslim, adhering to the Quran and Hadiths. His actions were justified as fulfilling Islamic duties.

Temple destruction
Quran 21:58: “So he broke them (idols) into pieces...” (Abraham smashing idols)

Aurangzeb ordered temples like Kashi Vishwanath and Mathura’s Krishna Janmabhoomi to be razed.

/2

Read 18 tweets

The Jaipur Dialogues

@JaipurDialogues

Jan 17

Balasaheb Thackeray is widely known as the champion of Hindutva, but here's a lesser-known story: just months before embracing Hindutva, he was on the verge of becoming a communist: Bhau Torsekar

Full Story👇

In the early 1980s, Balasaheb was seeking answers to the political chaos around him. During this period, some prominent figures in the communist circle approached him. Bani Deshpande, the son-in-law of Comrade Dange, and Vavi Bhatt, a well-known communist publisher, began visiting him at Matoshree.

/1

For over a month and a half, Balasaheb, deeply interested in Marxist ideas, was being taught Das Kapital—Karl Marx's magnum opus. These discussions weren’t just theoretical; they were about understanding the socio-political fabric of India.

/2

Read 8 tweets

The Jaipur Dialogues

@JaipurDialogues

Jan 17

1/ Former Pakistan PM Imran Khan has been sentenced to 14 years in prison, and his wife Bushra Bibi to 7 years, in a mega corruption case. The couple has also been fined for their involvement in the Al-Qadir Trust land scandal.

2/ The case alleges that Khan and Bibi accepted land worth billions as a bribe from real estate tycoon Malik Riaz in exchange for laundering money during Khan’s tenure (2018–2022). The land was ostensibly for a spiritual educational institute under Al-Qadir Trust.

3/ The Al-Qadir Trust scandal has been a key legal battle for Khan, with claims that the couple used the Trust to mask corrupt dealings. However, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), Khan’s party, denies the allegations, calling them politically motivated.

Read 7 tweets

The Jaipur Dialogues

@JaipurDialogues

Jan 14

1/ The Third Battle of Panipat (January 14, 1761): A Turning Point
The battle was fought between the Maratha Empire, which sought to extend its influence in northern India, and Ahmad Shah Abdali (Ahmad Shah Durrani), founder of the Durrani Empire. Abdali, an Afghan king, had invaded India multiple times, but this battle was his most decisive. Despite the Marathas’ tactical defeat, their extraordinary valor made it one of the most legendary conflicts in Indian history. It is remembered as one of the largest and bloodiest battles fought on Indian soil

2/ By the 1750s, the Marathas had established themselves as the most powerful empire in India. From the Deccan to the Gangetic Plains, their dominion extended far and wide, with the Peshwas operating as the empire’s de facto rulers. This expansion alarmed Abdali, who saw Maratha influence as a threat to his ambitions in Punjab and the Indian heartland. Abdali formed a coalition of Afghan tribes, Rohillas (Pathan soldiers from northern India), and Shuja-ud-Daula, the Nawab of Awadh, to resist the Marathas. The battle was as much about territorial dominance as it was about the control of India’s future.

3/ Under the leadership of Sadashivrao Bhau, a 100,000-strong Maratha army marched north in response to Abdali’s invasion. Sadashivrao was joined by key leaders like Vishwasrao, the Peshwa’s son, who symbolized the hope of the Maratha dynasty.

The Marathas did not just come to fight; they also brought families, clergy, and civilians, reflecting their intent to settle in the north permanently. This slowed their mobility and proved to be a logistical challenge.

Read 9 tweets

The Jaipur Dialogues

@JaipurDialogues

Jan 12

1/ Tensions flared at the Indo-Bangladesh border in West Bengal's Malda! As India’s BSF began fencing operations near Sukdebpur to combat illegal crossings, Bangladesh's BGB objected. What followed was a high-stakes showdown involving both border forces AND local villagers. Here's what happened…

Image YouTube ziaIAS

2/ The fencing, part of India’s effort to secure the 4,096.7 kilometers porous border it shares with Bangladesh. These efforts resulted in a face-off between BGB (Border Guard Bangladesh) at Malda, who claimed that the fencing was a violation agreement. Villagers from Bangladesh crossed over to protest alongside the BGB. The atmosphere was electric and volatile.

3/ On the Indian side, the BSF held its ground. Under the orders to complete the task without escalating the situation needed a unique solution. Hence, the local villagers rallied behind the BSF by chanting slogans like “Vande Mataram” and “Bharat Mata ki Jai.” They helped the BSF show strength in the face of Bangladeshi civilians trying to create tensions and the moment of standoff at the Border.

Read 8 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

The Jaipur Dialogues

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @JaipurDialogues

The Jaipur Dialogues

The Jaipur Dialogues

The Jaipur Dialogues

The Jaipur Dialogues

The Jaipur Dialogues

The Jaipur Dialogues

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!